Naturalismo metafísico (Portuguese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Naturalismo metafísico" in Portuguese language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Portuguese rank
3rd place
6th place
low place
low place
1st place
1st place
low place
9,394th place
30th place
57th place
low place
low place
low place
4,553rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
305th place
293rd place
179th place
198th place
low place
low place
3,169th place
6,658th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
5th place
5th place
2nd place
4th place

authorhouse.com

bookstore.authorhouse.com

books.google.com

cambridge.org

ebooks.cambridge.org

chronicle.com

  • Plantinga, Alvin (11 April 2010). "Evolution, Shibboleths, and Philosophers — Letters to the Editor". The Chronicle of Higher Education… I do indeed think that evolution functions as a contemporary shibboleth by which to distinguish the ignorant fundamentalist goats from the informed and scientifically literate sheep. According to Richard Dawkins, 'It is absolutely safe to say that, if you meet somebody who claims not to believe in evolution, that person is ignorant, stupid, or insane (or wicked, but I'd rather not consider that).' Daniel Dennett goes Dawkins one (or two) further: 'Anyone today who doubts that the variety of life on this planet was produced by a process of evolution is simply ignorant—inexcusably ignorant.' You wake up in the middle of the night; you think, can that whole Darwinian story really be true? Wham! You are inexcusably ignorant. I do think that evolution has become a modern idol of the tribe. But of course it doesn't even begin to follow that I think the scientific theory of evolution is false. And I don't.

doi.org

dx.doi.org

fitelson.org

giffordlectures.org

infidels.org

infona.pl

ncse.com

onthehuman.org

secularhumanism.org

stanford.edu

plato.stanford.edu

  • Papineau, David (2007). "Naturalism". In Edward N. Zalta. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. It thus gives rise to a particularly strong form of ontological naturalism, namely the physicalist doctrine that any state that has physical effects must itself be physical.

stephenjaygould.org

  • Schafersman, Steven D. (1996). "Naturalism is Today An Essential Part of Science". Section "The Origin of Naturalism and Its Relation to Science". Certainly most philosophical naturalists today are materialists[...]"
  • Schafersman, Steven D. (1996). "Naturalism is Today An Essential Part of Science". Section "The Origin of Naturalism and Its Relation to Science". Naturalism did not exist as a philosophy before the nineteenth century, but only as an occasionally adopted and non-rigorous method among natural philosophers. It is a unique philosophy in that it is not ancient or prior to science, and that it developed largely due to the influence of science. Jump up ^

telegraph.co.uk

thinkingchristian.net

web.archive.org

worldcat.org