Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Prisão de Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva" in Portuguese language version.
Mas a prisão de Lula se insere na escalada autoritária e reacionária que cresce no país. Não é preciso ser petista para combater um antipetismo raivoso e raso, que retroage à Guerra Fria. É dever de todo democrata repudiar não só a intolerância simbólica, mas a barbárie da violência física, que culminou no assassinato da nossa vereadora Marielle Franco e do Anderson. Abominável crime político, que não pode ficar impune.
The UN Human Rights Committee has requested Brazil to take all necessary measures to ensure that Lula can enjoy and exercise his political rights while in prison, as candidate in the 2018 presidential elections. This includes having appropriate access to the media and members of his political party. The Committee also requested Brazil not to prevent him from standing for election in the 2018 presidential elections, until his appeals before the courts have been completed in fair judicial proceedings. The technical name for this request is "interim measures" and these relate to his pending individual complaint which remains before the Committee. This request does not mean that the Committee has found a violation yet - it is an urgent measure to preserve Lula’s right, pending the case consideration on the merits, which will take place next year.
It is important to note that although this response is being provided through the UN Human Rights Office, it is a decision of the Human Rights Committee, which is made up of independent experts. This response may be attributed to the Human Rights Committee.
In the author’s case, the Committee observes that it has already concluded that the criminal proceedings against him and his subsequent conviction violated due process guarantees provided for in article 14 of the Covenant. Therefore, the Committee finds that the consequent ban on the author’s right to run for elections as well as the restriction on his right to vote constituted a violation of article 25 (b). [...] the Committee wishes to receive from the State party, within 180 days, information about the measures taken to give effect to the Committee’s Views. The State party is also requested to publish the present Views, have them translated into the official language of the State party and to disseminate them widely.
O Brasil, portanto, se comprometeu legalmente em escutar o Comitê de Direitos Humanos. As ações do Comitê estão baseadas diretamente nas obrigações legais que o Brasil assumiu ao fazer parte do Pacto e do Protocolo Opcional. A ação é limitada, e foi tomada para garantir que os direitos do sr. Lula da Silva não sejam minados de forma irreparável enquanto sua queixa está pendente diante do Comitê.
Mas a prisão de Lula se insere na escalada autoritária e reacionária que cresce no país. Não é preciso ser petista para combater um antipetismo raivoso e raso, que retroage à Guerra Fria. É dever de todo democrata repudiar não só a intolerância simbólica, mas a barbárie da violência física, que culminou no assassinato da nossa vereadora Marielle Franco e do Anderson. Abominável crime político, que não pode ficar impune.
The UN Human Rights Committee has requested Brazil to take all necessary measures to ensure that Lula can enjoy and exercise his political rights while in prison, as candidate in the 2018 presidential elections. This includes having appropriate access to the media and members of his political party. The Committee also requested Brazil not to prevent him from standing for election in the 2018 presidential elections, until his appeals before the courts have been completed in fair judicial proceedings. The technical name for this request is "interim measures" and these relate to his pending individual complaint which remains before the Committee. This request does not mean that the Committee has found a violation yet - it is an urgent measure to preserve Lula’s right, pending the case consideration on the merits, which will take place next year.
It is important to note that although this response is being provided through the UN Human Rights Office, it is a decision of the Human Rights Committee, which is made up of independent experts. This response may be attributed to the Human Rights Committee.
O Brasil, portanto, se comprometeu legalmente em escutar o Comitê de Direitos Humanos. As ações do Comitê estão baseadas diretamente nas obrigações legais que o Brasil assumiu ao fazer parte do Pacto e do Protocolo Opcional. A ação é limitada, e foi tomada para garantir que os direitos do sr. Lula da Silva não sejam minados de forma irreparável enquanto sua queixa está pendente diante do Comitê.
