Yeshu (Portuguese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Yeshu" in Portuguese language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Portuguese rank

3loc.gov

70^th place

170^th place

3worldcat.org

5^th place

loc.gov

lccn.loc.gov

Berger, David; Carlebach, Elishiva (ed.); Efron, John M. (ed.); Myers, David N. (ed.) (1998). Jewish History and Jewish Memory: Essays in Honor of Yosef Hayim Yerushalmi. Col: The Tauber Institute for the Study of European Jewry. 29. Hanover, New Hampshire: Brandeis University Press. p. 33. ISBN 978-0-87451-871-9. LCCN 98-14431. OCLC 44965639. It is well known that when R. Yehiel of Paris was confronted in 1240 with the argument that the Talmud should be banned partly because of blasphemies against Jesus, he maintained that the Jesus of the Talmud and the Jesus of the Christians are two different people.…Whatever one thinks of the sincerity of the multiple Jesus theory, R. Yehiel found a way to neutralize some dangerous rabbinic statements, and yet the essential Ashkenazic evaluation of Jesus remains even in the text of this disputation.…In the fourteenth century, Moses ha-Kohen de Tordesillas made much stronger use of the theory of two Jesuses in defending Judaism and the Talmud against renewed attack.
Meier, John P. (1991). The Roots of the Problem and the Person. Col: A marginal Jew: rethinking the historical Jesus. 1. [S.l.]: Anchor Bible Series. p. 98. ISBN 978-0-385-26425-9. LCCN 91010538. OCLC 316164636. While not accepting the full, radical approach of Maier, I think we can agree with him on one basic point: in the earliest rabbinic sources, there is no clear or even probable reference to Jesus of Nazareth. Furthermore, I favor the view that, when we do finally find such references in later rabbinic literature, they are most probably reactions to Christian claims, oral or written.
Gerd, Theissen; Merz, Annette (1998). The Historical Jesus: A Comprehensive Guide. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress. pp. 74–76. ISBN 978-0-8006-3122-2. LCCN 98016181. OCLC 38590348

worldcat.org

Berger, David; Carlebach, Elishiva (ed.); Efron, John M. (ed.); Myers, David N. (ed.) (1998). Jewish History and Jewish Memory: Essays in Honor of Yosef Hayim Yerushalmi. Col: The Tauber Institute for the Study of European Jewry. 29. Hanover, New Hampshire: Brandeis University Press. p. 33. ISBN 978-0-87451-871-9. LCCN 98-14431. OCLC 44965639. It is well known that when R. Yehiel of Paris was confronted in 1240 with the argument that the Talmud should be banned partly because of blasphemies against Jesus, he maintained that the Jesus of the Talmud and the Jesus of the Christians are two different people.…Whatever one thinks of the sincerity of the multiple Jesus theory, R. Yehiel found a way to neutralize some dangerous rabbinic statements, and yet the essential Ashkenazic evaluation of Jesus remains even in the text of this disputation.…In the fourteenth century, Moses ha-Kohen de Tordesillas made much stronger use of the theory of two Jesuses in defending Judaism and the Talmud against renewed attack.
Meier, John P. (1991). The Roots of the Problem and the Person. Col: A marginal Jew: rethinking the historical Jesus. 1. [S.l.]: Anchor Bible Series. p. 98. ISBN 978-0-385-26425-9. LCCN 91010538. OCLC 316164636. While not accepting the full, radical approach of Maier, I think we can agree with him on one basic point: in the earliest rabbinic sources, there is no clear or even probable reference to Jesus of Nazareth. Furthermore, I favor the view that, when we do finally find such references in later rabbinic literature, they are most probably reactions to Christian claims, oral or written.
Gerd, Theissen; Merz, Annette (1998). The Historical Jesus: A Comprehensive Guide. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress. pp. 74–76. ISBN 978-0-8006-3122-2. LCCN 98016181. OCLC 38590348