Al Doilea Templu din Ierusalim (Romanian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Al Doilea Templu din Ierusalim" in Romanian language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Romanian rank

7books.google.com

3^rd place

6^th place

2wikipedia.org

low place

books.google.com

Leander 2013, p. 167. se referă la Hengel 1985, pp. 7–28. și Collins 2007, pp. 11–14. ca argumentând pentru o datare imediat înainte de 70 d.Hr. și la Theissen 1992, pp. 258–262. , Incigneri 2003, pp. 116–155. , Head 2004. și Kloppenborg 2005. argumentând pentru o datare imediat după 70 d.Hr. Leander se referă, de asemenea, la poziția minoritară a lui Crossley 2004. , care a propus o datare mult mai devreme c. 35–45 AD, enumerând recenzii care subliniază problemele cu argumentul lui Crossley. Leander, Hans (2013). Discourses of Empire: The Gospel of Mark from a Postcolonial Perspective. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature. ISBN 978-1-58983-889-5. Hengel, Martin (1985). Studies in the Gospel of Mark. London: SCM. Collins, Adela Yarbro (2007). Mark: A Commentary. Minneapolis: Fortress Press. Theissen, Gerd (1992). The Gospels in Context: Social and Political History in the Synoptic Tradition. Edinburgh: T&T Clark. Incigneri, Brian J. (2003). The Gospel to the Romans: The Setting and Rhetoric of Mark’s Gospel. Biblical Interpretation Series. 65. Leiden: Brill. Head, Ivan (2004). „Mark as a Roman Document from the Year 69: Testing Martin Hengel's Thesis”. Journal of Religious History. 28: 240–259. Kloppenborg, John S. (2005). „Evocatio deorum and the Date of Mark”. Journal of Biblical Literature. 124: 419–450. Crossley, James G. (2004). The Date of Mark's Gospel: Insight from the Law in Earliest Christianity (The Library of New Testament Studies). T & T Clark International. ISBN 978-0567081957.
Grabbe, Lester L. (27 iulie 2006). A History of the Jews and Judaism in the Second Temple Period (vol. 1): The Persian Period (539-331BCE). Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 355. ISBN 978-0-567-21617-5. The alleged decree of Cyrus permitting—even commanding—the Jews to rebuild the temple and permitting them to return cannot be considered authentic.
Adams 2015, p. 208. Adams, Samuel V. (2015). The Reality of God and Historical Method: Apocalyptic Theology in Conversation with N. T. Wright. InterVarsity Press. ISBN 9780830899500.
Law 2012, p. 22. Law, David R. (2012). The Historical-Critical Method: A Guide for the Perplexed. A&C. ISBN 9780567400123.
Miller 2015, p. 325. Miller, Robert J. (2015). Helping Jesus Fulfill Prophecy. Wipf and Stock. ISBN 9781498228961.
Koester 2000, pp. 44–46. Koester, Helmut (2000) [1982]. Introduction to the New Testament: History and literature of early Christianity (ed. 2). Walter de Gruyter. ISBN 978-0-567-16561-9.
Leander 2013, p. 167. Leander, Hans (2013). Discourses of Empire: The Gospel of Mark from a Postcolonial Perspective. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature. ISBN 978-1-58983-889-5.

wikipedia.org

en.wikipedia.org

Leander 2013, p. 167. se referă la Hengel 1985, pp. 7–28. și Collins 2007, pp. 11–14. ca argumentând pentru o datare imediat înainte de 70 d.Hr. și la Theissen 1992, pp. 258–262. , Incigneri 2003, pp. 116–155. , Head 2004. și Kloppenborg 2005. argumentând pentru o datare imediat după 70 d.Hr. Leander se referă, de asemenea, la poziția minoritară a lui Crossley 2004. , care a propus o datare mult mai devreme c. 35–45 AD, enumerând recenzii care subliniază problemele cu argumentul lui Crossley. Leander, Hans (2013). Discourses of Empire: The Gospel of Mark from a Postcolonial Perspective. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature. ISBN 978-1-58983-889-5. Hengel, Martin (1985). Studies in the Gospel of Mark. London: SCM. Collins, Adela Yarbro (2007). Mark: A Commentary. Minneapolis: Fortress Press. Theissen, Gerd (1992). The Gospels in Context: Social and Political History in the Synoptic Tradition. Edinburgh: T&T Clark. Incigneri, Brian J. (2003). The Gospel to the Romans: The Setting and Rhetoric of Mark’s Gospel. Biblical Interpretation Series. 65. Leiden: Brill. Head, Ivan (2004). „Mark as a Roman Document from the Year 69: Testing Martin Hengel's Thesis”. Journal of Religious History. 28: 240–259. Kloppenborg, John S. (2005). „Evocatio deorum and the Date of Mark”. Journal of Biblical Literature. 124: 419–450. Crossley, James G. (2004). The Date of Mark's Gospel: Insight from the Law in Earliest Christianity (The Library of New Testament Studies). T & T Clark International. ISBN 978-0567081957.
Koester 2000, pp. 44–46. Koester, Helmut (2000) [1982]. Introduction to the New Testament: History and literature of early Christianity (ed. 2). Walter de Gruyter. ISBN 978-0-567-16561-9.