Amprentă ecologică (Romanian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Amprentă ecologică" in Romanian language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Romanian rank

18doi.org

2^nd place

3^rd place

16web.archive.org

1^st place

10footprintnetwork.org

low place

9,435^th place

3nih.gov

4^th place

3europa.eu

68^th place

19^th place

2worldcat.org

5^th place

11^th place

2bbc.co.uk

8^th place

14^th place

1mdpi.com

2,912^th place

3,161^st place

1springer.com

274^th place

262^nd place

1london.gov.uk

3,871^st place

1,770^th place

1academia.edu

121^st place

129^th place

1cf.ac.uk

low place

1nytimes.com

7^th place

25^th place

1sundayherald.com

low place

1radicalroutes.org.uk

low place

1qz.com

1,110^th place

2,260^th place

1erscp2012.eu

low place

1vox.com

484^th place

1,908^th place

1sciencemag.org

857^th place

479^th place

1oregonstate.edu

2,041^st place

1,034^th place

1theguardian.com

12^th place

74^th place

1admin.ch

279^th place

217^th place

1umweltdaten.de

low place

1epa.ie

low place

1agedi.ae

low place

1vu.nl

8,540^th place

low place

1usc.edu

1,077^th place

705^th place

1usyd.edu.au

6,328^th place

8,205^th place

1arquivo.pt

1,668^th place

1,526^th place

1uic.com.au

low place

1doe.gov

2,463^rd place

1,033^rd place

1nuclearinfo.net

low place

1aps.org

1,503^rd place

1,044^th place

1russp.org

low place

1post-gazette.com

569^th place

4,670^th place

1ornl.gov

5,534^th place

1,101^st place

1ohio-state.edu

5,528^th place

1,670^th place

1world-nuclear.org

3,446^th place

1,895^th place

1epa.wa.gov.au

low place

1gov.uk

432^nd place

748^th place

1nationalgeographic.com

344^th place

184^th place

academia.edu

Tyszczuk, Renata. „Most poignantly... cities in the Anthropocene will remain the 'ground zero'”. The Cambridge Journal of Architecture.

admin.ch

bfs.admin.ch

http://www.footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/national_reviews Arhivat în 24 februarie 2009, la Wayback Machine.. More specifically, reviews by nations include Switzerland – http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/en/index/themen/21/03/blank/blank/01.html (technical and descriptive report). Eurostat – http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-AU-06-001/EN/KS-AU-06-001-EN.PDF Arhivat în 9 aprilie 2011, la Wayback Machine. Germany – http://www.umweltdaten.de/publikationen/fpdf-l/3489.pdf Arhivat în 10 iunie 2011, la Wayback Machine. Ireland – http://erc.epa.ie/safer/iso19115/displayISO19115.jsp?isoID=56#files Arhivat în 21 iulie 2011, la Wayback Machine. DG Environment – June 2008: "Potential of the Ecological Footprint for monitoring environmental impact from natural resource use" available at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/natres/studies.htm United Arab Emirates – Al Basama Al Beeiya Initiative http://www.agedi.ae/ecofootprintuae/default.aspx Arhivat în 28 mai 2010, la Wayback Machine.

agedi.ae

http://www.footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/national_reviews Arhivat în 24 februarie 2009, la Wayback Machine.. More specifically, reviews by nations include Switzerland – http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/en/index/themen/21/03/blank/blank/01.html (technical and descriptive report). Eurostat – http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-AU-06-001/EN/KS-AU-06-001-EN.PDF Arhivat în 9 aprilie 2011, la Wayback Machine. Germany – http://www.umweltdaten.de/publikationen/fpdf-l/3489.pdf Arhivat în 10 iunie 2011, la Wayback Machine. Ireland – http://erc.epa.ie/safer/iso19115/displayISO19115.jsp?isoID=56#files Arhivat în 21 iulie 2011, la Wayback Machine. DG Environment – June 2008: "Potential of the Ecological Footprint for monitoring environmental impact from natural resource use" available at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/natres/studies.htm United Arab Emirates – Al Basama Al Beeiya Initiative http://www.agedi.ae/ecofootprintuae/default.aspx Arhivat în 28 mai 2010, la Wayback Machine.

aps.org

units.aps.org

David Bodansky (iunie 2001). „The Environmental Paradox of Nuclear Power”. Environmental Practice. 3 (2): 86–8. doi:10.1017/S1466046600002234. Arhivat din original la 27 ianuarie 2008. (reprinted by the American Physical Society)

arquivo.pt

Questions and Answers, Global Footprint Network

bbc.co.uk

news.bbc.co.uk

Global ecosystems 'face collapse' BBC News. Retrieved: 2007-05-18.
Alex Kirby (13 decembrie 2004). „Pollution: A life and death issue”. BBC News. Accesat în 31 ianuarie 2008.

cf.ac.uk

brass.cf.ac.uk

A Research Agenda for Improving National Ecological Footprint Accounts Retrieved: 2007-11-11 Arhivat în 28 noiembrie 2007, la Wayback Machine.

doe.gov

eia.doe.gov

Electric Power Industry CO₂ Emissions accessed 20 October 2007

doi.org

Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). „Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability (în engleză). 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
Yasin, Iftikhar; Ahmad, Nawaz; Chaudhary, M. Aslam (22 iulie 2019). „Catechizing the Environmental-Impression of Urbanization, Financial Development, and Political Institutions: A Circumstance of Ecological Footprints in 110 Developed and Less-Developed Countries”. Social Indicators Research (în engleză). doi:10.1007/s11205-019-02163-3. ISSN 0303-8300.
Lin, D; Hanscom, L; Murthy, A; Galli, A; Evans, M; Neill, E; Mancini, MS; Martindill, J; Medouar, F-Z; Huang, S; Wackernagel, M. (2018). "Ecological Footprint Accounting for Countries: Updates and Results of the National Footprint Accounts, 2012–2018". Resources. 7(3): 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources7030058
Borucke, M; Moore, D; Cranston, G; Gracey, K; Lazarus, E; Morales, J.C.; Wackernagel, M. (2013). „Accounting for demand and supply of the biosphere's regenerative capacity: The National Footprint Accounts' underlying methodology and framework”. Ecological Indicators. 24: 518–533. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.08.005.
Rees, William E. (octombrie 1992). „Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out”. Environment & Urbanization. 4 (2): 121–130. doi:10.1177/095624789200400212.
Tabi, Andrea (2013). „Does pro-environmental behaviour affect carbon emissions?”. Energy Policy. 63: 972–981. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.049. no significant difference is found between the impacts of environmentally aware and environmentally unaware consumers, i.e. both ‘Brown’ and ‘Supergreen’ consumers consume approximately the same amount of energy and produce approximately the same amount of carbon emissions
Ripple, William J.; et al. (13 noiembrie 2017), „World Scientists' Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice” (PDF), BioScience, 67 (12), pp. 1026–1028, doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125, arhivat din original (PDF) la 15 decembrie 2019, accesat în 9 decembrie 2019
Fiala, N. (2008). „Measuring sustainability: Why the ecological footprint is bad economics and bad environmental science”. Ecological Economics. 67 (4): 519–525. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.07.023.
Blomqvist, L.; Brook, B.W.; Ellis, E.C.; Kareiva, P.M.; Nordhaus, T.; Shellenberger, M. (2013). „Does the shoe fit? Real versus imagined ecological footprints”. PLoS Biology. 11 (11): e1001700. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001700. PMC 3818165 . PMID 24223517.
Rees, W.E.; Wackernagel, M. (2013). „The Shoe Fits, but the Footprint is Largerthan Earth”. PLoS Biology. 11 (11): e1001701. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001701. PMC 3818166 . PMID 24223518.
Blomqvist, L.; Brook, B.W.; Ellis, E.C.; Kareiva, P.M.; Nordhaus, T.; et al. (2013). „The ecological footprint remains a misleading metric of global sustainability”. PLoS Biology. 11 (11): e1001702. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001702. PMC 3818167 . PMID 24223519.
Goldfinger; Wackernagel, S. M.; Galli, A.; Lazarus, E.; Lin, D. (2014). „Footprint facts and fallacies: A response to Giampietro and Saltelli (2014) "Footprints to Nowhere"”. Ecological Indicators. 46: 622–632. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.025.
Giampietro, M.; Saltelli, A.; et al. (2014). „Footworking in circles: Reply to Goldfinger et al. (2014) "Footprint Facts and Fallacies: A Response to Giampietro and Saltelli (2014) Footprints to nowhere"”. Ecological Indicators. 46: 260–263. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.06.019.
Van; den Bergh, J.; Grazi, Fabio (2015). „Reply to the first systematic response by the Global Footprint Network to criticism: A real debate finally?”. Ecological Indicators. 58: 458–463. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.007.
F. Grazi; J.C.J.M. van den Bergh; P. Rietveld (2007). „Welfare economics versus ecological footprint: modeling agglomeration, externalities and trade” (PDF). Environmental and Resource Economics. 38 (1): 135–153. doi:10.1007/s10640-006-9067-2.
Newman, Peter (octombrie 2006). „The environmental impact of cities”. Environment and Urbanization (în engleză). 18 (2): 275–295. doi:10.1177/0956247806069599. ISSN 0956-2478.
Lenzen, Manfred; Murray Shauna A. (2001). „A modified ecological footprint method and its application to Australia”. Ecological Economics. 37 (2): 229–255. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00275-5.
David Bodansky (iunie 2001). „The Environmental Paradox of Nuclear Power”. Environmental Practice. 3 (2): 86–8. doi:10.1017/S1466046600002234. Arhivat din original la 27 ianuarie 2008. (reprinted by the American Physical Society)

epa.ie

erc.epa.ie

http://www.footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/national_reviews Arhivat în 24 februarie 2009, la Wayback Machine.. More specifically, reviews by nations include Switzerland – http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/en/index/themen/21/03/blank/blank/01.html (technical and descriptive report). Eurostat – http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-AU-06-001/EN/KS-AU-06-001-EN.PDF Arhivat în 9 aprilie 2011, la Wayback Machine. Germany – http://www.umweltdaten.de/publikationen/fpdf-l/3489.pdf Arhivat în 10 iunie 2011, la Wayback Machine. Ireland – http://erc.epa.ie/safer/iso19115/displayISO19115.jsp?isoID=56#files Arhivat în 21 iulie 2011, la Wayback Machine. DG Environment – June 2008: "Potential of the Ecological Footprint for monitoring environmental impact from natural resource use" available at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/natres/studies.htm United Arab Emirates – Al Basama Al Beeiya Initiative http://www.agedi.ae/ecofootprintuae/default.aspx Arhivat în 28 mai 2010, la Wayback Machine.

epa.wa.gov.au

Report identifies population and consumption as an environmental priority Arhivat în 18 octombrie 2016, la Wayback Machine., accessed 6 March 2016.

erscp2012.eu

Csutora, M. „The ecological footprint of green and brown consumers. Introducing the behaviour-impact-gap (BIG) problem” (PDF). European Round Table on Sustainable Consumption and Production (ERSCP) 2012. 15th European Roundtable on Sustainable Consumption and Production. Arhivat din original (PDF) la 19 octombrie 2019. Accesat în 13 februarie 2018. The research found no significant difference between the carbon footprints of green and brown consumers suggesting that individual environmental behaviour does not always modify consumption patterns significantly.

europa.eu

ec.europa.eu

Analysis of the potential of the Ecological Footprint and related assessment tools for use in the EU’s Thematic Strategy on the Sustainable Use of Natural Resources is available at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/natres/studies.htm
http://www.footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/national_reviews Arhivat în 24 februarie 2009, la Wayback Machine.. More specifically, reviews by nations include Switzerland – http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/en/index/themen/21/03/blank/blank/01.html (technical and descriptive report). Eurostat – http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-AU-06-001/EN/KS-AU-06-001-EN.PDF Arhivat în 9 aprilie 2011, la Wayback Machine. Germany – http://www.umweltdaten.de/publikationen/fpdf-l/3489.pdf Arhivat în 10 iunie 2011, la Wayback Machine. Ireland – http://erc.epa.ie/safer/iso19115/displayISO19115.jsp?isoID=56#files Arhivat în 21 iulie 2011, la Wayback Machine. DG Environment – June 2008: "Potential of the Ecological Footprint for monitoring environmental impact from natural resource use" available at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/natres/studies.htm United Arab Emirates – Al Basama Al Beeiya Initiative http://www.agedi.ae/ecofootprintuae/default.aspx Arhivat în 28 mai 2010, la Wayback Machine.

epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu

http://www.footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/national_reviews Arhivat în 24 februarie 2009, la Wayback Machine.. More specifically, reviews by nations include Switzerland – http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/en/index/themen/21/03/blank/blank/01.html (technical and descriptive report). Eurostat – http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-AU-06-001/EN/KS-AU-06-001-EN.PDF Arhivat în 9 aprilie 2011, la Wayback Machine. Germany – http://www.umweltdaten.de/publikationen/fpdf-l/3489.pdf Arhivat în 10 iunie 2011, la Wayback Machine. Ireland – http://erc.epa.ie/safer/iso19115/displayISO19115.jsp?isoID=56#files Arhivat în 21 iulie 2011, la Wayback Machine. DG Environment – June 2008: "Potential of the Ecological Footprint for monitoring environmental impact from natural resource use" available at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/natres/studies.htm United Arab Emirates – Al Basama Al Beeiya Initiative http://www.agedi.ae/ecofootprintuae/default.aspx Arhivat în 28 mai 2010, la Wayback Machine.

footprintnetwork.org

Global Footprint Network "Ecological Footprint: Overview." Retrieved on April 16, 2017.
Global Footprint Network. „Ecological Footprint Standards 2009”. Global Footprint Network. Accesat în 16 iulie 2018.
„Methodology and Data”. Global Footprint Network. Accesat în 15 iulie 2018.
[1] or Arhivat în 29 ianuarie 2009, la Wayback Machine. Living Planet Report 2008 outlines scenarios for humanity's future. Global Footprint Network. Retrieved: 2009-02-15
„Earth Overshoot Day”.
„Ecological Footprint”.
http://www.footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/national_reviews Arhivat în 24 februarie 2009, la Wayback Machine.. More specifically, reviews by nations include Switzerland – http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/en/index/themen/21/03/blank/blank/01.html (technical and descriptive report). Eurostat – http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-AU-06-001/EN/KS-AU-06-001-EN.PDF Arhivat în 9 aprilie 2011, la Wayback Machine. Germany – http://www.umweltdaten.de/publikationen/fpdf-l/3489.pdf Arhivat în 10 iunie 2011, la Wayback Machine. Ireland – http://erc.epa.ie/safer/iso19115/displayISO19115.jsp?isoID=56#files Arhivat în 21 iulie 2011, la Wayback Machine. DG Environment – June 2008: "Potential of the Ecological Footprint for monitoring environmental impact from natural resource use" available at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/natres/studies.htm United Arab Emirates – Al Basama Al Beeiya Initiative http://www.agedi.ae/ecofootprintuae/default.aspx Arhivat în 28 mai 2010, la Wayback Machine.
„Humanity Now Demanding 1.6 Earths”. Global Footprint Network. Accesat în 16 aprilie 2017.

data.footprintnetwork.org

„Data Sources”. Global Footprint Network. 17 aprilie 2017. Accesat în 16 aprilie 2017.
„Open Data Platform”. data.footprintnetwork.org. Accesat în 10 octombrie 2018.

gov.uk

Benn, Hilary; Milliband, Ed. „Guidance on how to measure and report your greenhouse gas emissions” (PDF). GOV.UK. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (UK). Accesat în 9 noiembrie 2016.

london.gov.uk

Lyndhurst, Brook (iunie 2003). „London's Ecological Footprint A review” (PDF). Mayor of London. Greater London Authority (commissioned by GLA Economics).

mdpi.com

Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). „Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability (în engleză). 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.

nationalgeographic.com

ngm.nationalgeographic.com

„Anthropocene: Age of Man - Pictures, More From National Geographic Magazine”. Arhivat din original la 19 februarie 2011. Accesat în 29 iulie 2016.

nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Blomqvist, L.; Brook, B.W.; Ellis, E.C.; Kareiva, P.M.; Nordhaus, T.; Shellenberger, M. (2013). „Does the shoe fit? Real versus imagined ecological footprints”. PLoS Biology. 11 (11): e1001700. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001700. PMC 3818165 . PMID 24223517.
Rees, W.E.; Wackernagel, M. (2013). „The Shoe Fits, but the Footprint is Largerthan Earth”. PLoS Biology. 11 (11): e1001701. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001701. PMC 3818166 . PMID 24223518.
Blomqvist, L.; Brook, B.W.; Ellis, E.C.; Kareiva, P.M.; Nordhaus, T.; et al. (2013). „The ecological footprint remains a misleading metric of global sustainability”. PLoS Biology. 11 (11): e1001702. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001702. PMC 3818167 . PMID 24223519.

nuclearinfo.net

nuclearinfo.net. Greenhouse Emissions of Nuclear Power Arhivat în 3 aprilie 2009, la Wayback Machine.

nytimes.com

William Safire, On Language: Footprint, New York Times Magazine, February 17, 2008

ohio-state.edu

physics.ohio-state.edu

Nuclear proliferation through coal burning Arhivat în 27 martie 2009, la Wayback Machine. — Gordon J. Aubrecht, II, Ohio State University

oregonstate.edu

scientistswarning.forestry.oregonstate.edu

Ripple, William J.; et al. (13 noiembrie 2017), „World Scientists' Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice” (PDF), BioScience, 67 (12), pp. 1026–1028, doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125, arhivat din original (PDF) la 15 decembrie 2019, accesat în 9 decembrie 2019

ornl.gov

Alex Gabbard. „Coal Combustion: Nuclear Resource or Danger”. Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Arhivat din original la 5 februarie 2007. Accesat în 31 ianuarie 2008.

post-gazette.com

Don Hopey (29 iunie 2005). „State sues utility for U.S. pollution violations”. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Arhivat din original la 24 ianuarie 2007. Accesat în 31 ianuarie 2008.

qz.com

Alden Wicker (1 martie 2017). „Conscious consumerism is a lie. Here's a better way to help save the world”. Quartz. Accesat în 13 februarie 2018. A 2012 study compared footprints of “green” consumers who try to make eco-friendly choices to the footprints of regular consumers. And they found no meaningful difference between the two.

radicalroutes.org.uk

Radical Routes (2006) How to work out your Ecological Footprint. Leeds. Radical Routes Ltd. Available to order or download on the Radical Routes web site

russp.org

„Some Amazing Facts about Nuclear Power”. august 2002. Accesat în 31 ianuarie 2008.

sciencemag.org

Perkins, Sid (11 iulie 2017). „The best way to reduce your carbon footprint is one the government isn't telling you about”. Science. Accesat în 8 aprilie 2018.

springer.com

link.springer.com

Yasin, Iftikhar; Ahmad, Nawaz; Chaudhary, M. Aslam (22 iulie 2019). „Catechizing the Environmental-Impression of Urbanization, Financial Development, and Political Institutions: A Circumstance of Ecological Footprints in 110 Developed and Less-Developed Countries”. Social Indicators Research (în engleză). doi:10.1007/s11205-019-02163-3. ISSN 0303-8300.

sundayherald.com

Findhorn eco-footprint is ‘world’s smallest’ Arhivat în 23 ianuarie 2009, la Wayback Machine. Sunday Herald, August 11, 2008. "A new expert study says the multinational community's ecological footprint is half the UK average. This means Findhorn uses 50% fewer resources and creates 50% less waste than normal."

theguardian.com

Carrington, Damian (31 mai 2018). „Avoiding meat and dairy is 'single biggest way' to reduce your impact on Earth”. The Guardian. Accesat în 29 martie 2019.

uic.com.au

Energy Analysis of Power Systems Arhivat în 3 martie 2008, la Wayback Machine. accessed 20 October 2007

umweltdaten.de

http://www.footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/national_reviews Arhivat în 24 februarie 2009, la Wayback Machine.. More specifically, reviews by nations include Switzerland – http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/en/index/themen/21/03/blank/blank/01.html (technical and descriptive report). Eurostat – http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-AU-06-001/EN/KS-AU-06-001-EN.PDF Arhivat în 9 aprilie 2011, la Wayback Machine. Germany – http://www.umweltdaten.de/publikationen/fpdf-l/3489.pdf Arhivat în 10 iunie 2011, la Wayback Machine. Ireland – http://erc.epa.ie/safer/iso19115/displayISO19115.jsp?isoID=56#files Arhivat în 21 iulie 2011, la Wayback Machine. DG Environment – June 2008: "Potential of the Ecological Footprint for monitoring environmental impact from natural resource use" available at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/natres/studies.htm United Arab Emirates – Al Basama Al Beeiya Initiative http://www.agedi.ae/ecofootprintuae/default.aspx Arhivat în 28 mai 2010, la Wayback Machine.

usc.edu

www-pam.usc.edu

„Planning and Markets: Peter Gordon and Harry W. Richardson”. Pam.usc.edu. Arhivat din original la 27 iunie 2010. Accesat în 8 noiembrie 2012.

usyd.edu.au

isa.org.usyd.edu.au

Lenzen, M., C. Borgstrom Hansson and S. Bond (2006) On the bioproductivity and land-disturbance metrics of the Ecological Footprint. University of Sydney, ISA Research Paper, June, 06, in collaboration with WWF. Retrieved: 2007-06-04.

vox.com

David Roberts (1 decembrie 2017). „Wealthier people produce more carbon pollution — even the "green" ones”. Vox. Accesat în 13 februarie 2018. Environmental identity will lead to some relatively low-impact (high-signaling) pro-environmental behaviors, but it rarely drives serious reductions in the biggest sources of lifestyle emissions. Environmental self-identification rises with income, but so do emissions. (A 2012 study and a 2013 study, both based on a survey in Hungary, found roughly the same thing.)

vu.nl

research.vu.nl

F. Grazi; J.C.J.M. van den Bergh; P. Rietveld (2007). „Welfare economics versus ecological footprint: modeling agglomeration, externalities and trade” (PDF). Environmental and Resource Economics. 38 (1): 135–153. doi:10.1007/s10640-006-9067-2.

web.archive.org

A Research Agenda for Improving National Ecological Footprint Accounts Retrieved: 2007-11-11 Arhivat în 28 noiembrie 2007, la Wayback Machine.
[1] or Arhivat în 29 ianuarie 2009, la Wayback Machine. Living Planet Report 2008 outlines scenarios for humanity's future. Global Footprint Network. Retrieved: 2009-02-15
Findhorn eco-footprint is ‘world’s smallest’ Arhivat în 23 ianuarie 2009, la Wayback Machine. Sunday Herald, August 11, 2008. "A new expert study says the multinational community's ecological footprint is half the UK average. This means Findhorn uses 50% fewer resources and creates 50% less waste than normal."
Csutora, M. „The ecological footprint of green and brown consumers. Introducing the behaviour-impact-gap (BIG) problem” (PDF). European Round Table on Sustainable Consumption and Production (ERSCP) 2012. 15th European Roundtable on Sustainable Consumption and Production. Arhivat din original (PDF) la 19 octombrie 2019. Accesat în 13 februarie 2018. The research found no significant difference between the carbon footprints of green and brown consumers suggesting that individual environmental behaviour does not always modify consumption patterns significantly.
Ripple, William J.; et al. (13 noiembrie 2017), „World Scientists' Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice” (PDF), BioScience, 67 (12), pp. 1026–1028, doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125, arhivat din original (PDF) la 15 decembrie 2019, accesat în 9 decembrie 2019
http://www.footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/national_reviews Arhivat în 24 februarie 2009, la Wayback Machine.. More specifically, reviews by nations include Switzerland – http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/en/index/themen/21/03/blank/blank/01.html (technical and descriptive report). Eurostat – http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-AU-06-001/EN/KS-AU-06-001-EN.PDF Arhivat în 9 aprilie 2011, la Wayback Machine. Germany – http://www.umweltdaten.de/publikationen/fpdf-l/3489.pdf Arhivat în 10 iunie 2011, la Wayback Machine. Ireland – http://erc.epa.ie/safer/iso19115/displayISO19115.jsp?isoID=56#files Arhivat în 21 iulie 2011, la Wayback Machine. DG Environment – June 2008: "Potential of the Ecological Footprint for monitoring environmental impact from natural resource use" available at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/natres/studies.htm United Arab Emirates – Al Basama Al Beeiya Initiative http://www.agedi.ae/ecofootprintuae/default.aspx Arhivat în 28 mai 2010, la Wayback Machine.
„Planning and Markets: Peter Gordon and Harry W. Richardson”. Pam.usc.edu. Arhivat din original la 27 iunie 2010. Accesat în 8 noiembrie 2012.
Energy Analysis of Power Systems Arhivat în 3 martie 2008, la Wayback Machine. accessed 20 October 2007
nuclearinfo.net. Greenhouse Emissions of Nuclear Power Arhivat în 3 aprilie 2009, la Wayback Machine.
David Bodansky (iunie 2001). „The Environmental Paradox of Nuclear Power”. Environmental Practice. 3 (2): 86–8. doi:10.1017/S1466046600002234. Arhivat din original la 27 ianuarie 2008. (reprinted by the American Physical Society)
Don Hopey (29 iunie 2005). „State sues utility for U.S. pollution violations”. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Arhivat din original la 24 ianuarie 2007. Accesat în 31 ianuarie 2008.
Alex Gabbard. „Coal Combustion: Nuclear Resource or Danger”. Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Arhivat din original la 5 februarie 2007. Accesat în 31 ianuarie 2008.
Nuclear proliferation through coal burning Arhivat în 27 martie 2009, la Wayback Machine. — Gordon J. Aubrecht, II, Ohio State University
„Safety of Nuclear Power Reactors”. Arhivat din original la 4 februarie 2007. Accesat în 9 decembrie 2019.
Report identifies population and consumption as an environmental priority Arhivat în 18 octombrie 2016, la Wayback Machine., accessed 6 March 2016.
„Anthropocene: Age of Man - Pictures, More From National Geographic Magazine”. Arhivat din original la 19 februarie 2011. Accesat în 29 iulie 2016.

world-nuclear.org

„Safety of Nuclear Power Reactors”. Arhivat din original la 4 februarie 2007. Accesat în 9 decembrie 2019.

worldcat.org

Yasin, Iftikhar; Ahmad, Nawaz; Chaudhary, M. Aslam (22 iulie 2019). „Catechizing the Environmental-Impression of Urbanization, Financial Development, and Political Institutions: A Circumstance of Ecological Footprints in 110 Developed and Less-Developed Countries”. Social Indicators Research (în engleză). doi:10.1007/s11205-019-02163-3. ISSN 0303-8300.
Newman, Peter (octombrie 2006). „The environmental impact of cities”. Environment and Urbanization (în engleză). 18 (2): 275–295. doi:10.1177/0956247806069599. ISSN 0956-2478.