Android (sistem de operare) (Romanian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Android (sistem de operare)" in Romanian language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Romanian rank
1st place
1st place
4,942nd place
5,542nd place
466th place
1,257th place
1,518th place
3,636th place
3,145th place
4,856th place
low place
7,943rd place
low place
low place
712th place
897th place
7th place
25th place
79th place
237th place
43rd place
2nd place
4,522nd place
3,687th place
low place
low place
272nd place
376th place
388th place
446th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
552nd place
2,227th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
310th place
1,271st place
4,216th place
2,902nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
4,121st place
low place
low place
low place
49th place
124th place
5,390th place
8,672nd place
6,158th place
low place
low place
low place
474th place
1,557th place
1,663rd place
834th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
5,669th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
616th place
2,567th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,216th place
1,838th place
low place
2,617th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
14th place
121st place
7,618th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place

alwaysinnovating.com

android-developers.blogspot.com

android-freeware.org

  • „Snake” (în English). Arhivat din original la . Accesat în . 

android.com

source.android.com

developer.android.com

androidcommunity.com

archive.today

archos.com

arenait.net

arstechnica.com

  • Paul, Ryan (). „Developing apps for Google Android: it's a mixed bag” (HTML). ars technica (în English). Accesat în . 
  • Paul, Ryan (). „Dream(sheep++): A developer's introduction to Google Android”. Accesat în . In fact, during a presentation at the Google IO conference, Google engineer Patrick Brady stated unambiguously that Android is not Linux.(...)The problem with Google's approach is that it makes Android an island. The highly insular nature of the platform prevents Android users and developers from taking advantage of the rich ecosystem of existing third-party Linux applications. Android doesn't officially support native C programs at all, so it won't be possible to port your favorite GTK+ or Qt applications to Android 

atoker.com

axdroid.blogspot.com

benno.id.au

betanews.com

boston.com

businessweek.com

chromium.org

src.chromium.org

cnet.com

news.cnet.com

code.google.com

davanum.wordpress.com

digg.com

directtraffic.org

droidweb.com

engadget.com

era.pl

eweek.com

gadget.ro

gizmodo.com

googleandblog.com

groups.google.com

guug.org

htc.com

ianskerrett.wordpress.com

  • Topic, Dalibor (). „What Does Android Mean for Sun's OpenJDK”. Accesat în . Android is proprietary, despite being marketed as open source. Android has a compatibility pledge, signed and kept behind closed doors. Android has no governance model, nor any indication there will be one. Android has no spec, and the license prohibits alternative implementations, as that’s not a use licensed by Google in the SDK license. Android is completely controlled by Google, and Google reserves the right to kill off competitors applications if they hurt Google financially, etc. It’s only as open as it is in Google’s financial interest to allow openness, by design. 

iht.com

infoq.com

informationweek.com

internettablettalk.com

itrunsonlinux.com

eeepc.itrunsonlinux.com

javalobby.org

  • van Gurp, Jilles (). „Google Android: Initial Impressions and Criticism”. Accesat în . Frankly, I don't understand why Google intends to ignore the vast amount of existing implementation out there. It seems like a bad case of "not invented here" to me. Ultimately, this will slow adoption. There are already too many Java platforms for the mobile world and this is yet another one 

linuxdevices.com

linuxinsider.com

livejournal.com

robilad.livejournal.com

  • Topic, Dalibor (). „QOTD: Google's license for the Android SDK”. Accesat în . There is a bunch of other rather objectionable stuff, but dear me, this is pretty bad as far as license agreements for pseudo-open-source software go 

ioerror.livejournal.com

mobiles2day.com

moconews.net

modmygphone.com

motorolafans.com

multigesture.net

networkworld.com

newlc.com

news.com

nokia.com

nytimes.com

oblomovka.com

openhandsetalliance.com

openmoko.org

wiki.openmoko.org

opt-development.co.uk

pcfastlane.com

phandroid.com

pocketpicks.co.uk

reuters.com

saurik.com

t-mobile.nl

talkandroid.com

theregister.co.uk

ultimate-tech-news.com

venturebeat.com

web.archive.org

wikidata.org

wsj.com

online.wsj.com

xda-developers.com

wiki.xda-developers.com