Biserica Adventistă de Ziua a Șaptea (Romanian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Biserica Adventistă de Ziua a Șaptea" in Romanian language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Romanian rank
1st place
1st place
low place
9,454th place
1,423rd place
130th place
9,837th place
8,401st place
low place
low place
3rd place
6th place
low place
low place
low place
1,055th place
7,357th place
677th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
105th place
272nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place

adra.org

  • ADRA (în engleză), ADRA 

adventist.org

publishing.gc.adventist.org

adventist.org

news.adventist.org

adventistarchives.org

adventistbiblicalresearch.org

adventistreview.org

adventisttruth.org

amazon.com

atoday.com

awr2.org

books.google.com

  • Bull, Malcolm; Lockhart, Keith (). „The Divine Realm”. Seeking a Sanctuary: Seventh-day Adventism and the American Dream. Indiana University Press. p. 75. ISBN 978-0-253-34764-0. With Adventism's most articulate spokesmen so implacably opposed to the doctrine of the Trinity, it is unsurprising that one researcher was forced to conclude that he was "unable to discover any evidence that 'many were Trinitarians' before 1898, nor has there been found any Trinitarian declaration written, prior to that date, by an Adventist writer other than Ellen G. White."46 But even this is an overstatement. Although not actively anti-Trinitarian, Ellen White always carefully avoided using the term "Trinity," and her husband stated categorically that her visions did not support the Trinitarian creed.47 
  • Guy, Fritz (). „Theology”. În Dopp Aamodt, Terrie; Land, Gary; Numbers, Ronald L. Ellen Harmon White: American Prophet. Oxford University Press. p. 144-145. ISBN 978-0-19-937387-1. Strictly speaking, very seldom did Ellen White “do theology.” That is, she did not ordinarily do what professional theologians typically do. She did not produce a book of or about theology. She did not think, speak, and write in theological language. ... She did not elaborate a particular doctrine of the Trinity, atonement, God and time, or free will. She did not explain the precise meaning and broader implications of her own language and ideas, nor did she always use her theological vocabulary consistently. She did not endeavor to explain verbal or conceptual inconsistencies—either those of Scripture or her own—or to reduce the tensions inherent in her overall theological understanding. 

davidiansda.org

google.nl

books.google.nl

  • Kramer Linkin, Harriet (). „22 Mary Tighe, Psyche (1805)”. În Haekel, Ralf. Handbook of British Romanticism. Handbooks of English and American Studies. De Gruyter. p. nepaginat. ISBN 978-3-11-039340-8. Accesat în . 
  • Macfarlane, Robert (). Original Copy: Plagiarism and Originality in Nineteenth-Century Literature. OUP Oxford. p. 33. ISBN 978-0-19-153792-9. Accesat în . 
  • Bull, Malcolm; Lockhart, Keith (). „The Divine Realm”. Seeking a Sanctuary: Seventh-day Adventism and the American Dream. Indiana University Press. p. 72. ISBN 978-0-253-34764-0. Accesat în . but in her version of the event that destroyed the unity of the divine realm—the rebellion of Satan. As White related in the Spirit of Prophecy, the devil's revolt against divine law came about precisely because Satan was unwilling to accept Jesus' position in the heavenly hierarchy. At that time Satan, who was then known as Lucifer, was "a high and exalted angel, next in honor to God's dear Son."13 It was an arrangement with which he had been happy, according to White, until a primordial ceremony formalized the supremacy of Jesus: "The Father then made known that it was ordained by himself that Christ, his Son, should be equal with himself."14 However, Satan believed that this decision had been taken without prior consultation, and he convened a meeting of the angels to air his grievances. A ruler had now been appointed over them, he said, and "he would no longer submit to this invasion of his rights and theirs."15 

religioustolerance.org

sdakinship.org

spectrummagazine.org

truthorfables.com

ukapologetics.net

verticalnews.ro

web.archive.org

whiteestate.org

egwtext.whiteestate.org

  • Attorney Vincent L. Ramik, a specialist in patent, trademark, and copyright cases. After researching about 1,000 copyright cases in American legal history, Ramik issued a 27-page legal opinion in which he concluded "Ellen White was not a plagiarist, and her works did not constitute copyright infringement/piracy." [1] Arhivat în , la Wayback Machine.