Creaționism (Romanian Wikipedia)
Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Creaționism" in Romanian language version.
refsWebsite
Global rank
Romanian rank
1st place
1st place
5th place
11th place
3rd place
6th place
6th place
23rd place
40th place
16th place
low place
3,696th place
9,502nd place
5,500th place
low place
low place
8,518th place
low place
low place
low place
archive.org
- NAS 1999, p. R9 National Academy of Sciences (). Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences
(ed. 2nd). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. doi:10.17226/6024. ISBN 978-0-309-06406-4. LCCN 99006259. OCLC 43803228. PMID 25101403. Accesat în .
biologos.org
- Potts, Rick () [14 ianuarie 2019]. „Is evolution a "theory in crisis"? - Common-questions”. BioLogos. Accesat în .
books.google.com
- Sahotra Sarkar; Jessica Pfeifer (). The Philosophy of science: an encyclopedia. A-M. Psychology Press. p. 194. ISBN 978-0-415-93927-0.
- Mahner, Martin (). Pigliucci, Massimo; Boudry, Maarten, ed. Philosophy of pseudoscience reconsidering the demarcation problem (ed. Online-Ausg.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 30–31. ISBN 9780226051826. Accesat în .
Despite the lack of generally accepted demarcation criteria, we find remarkable agreement among virtually all philosophers and scientists that fields like astrology, creationism, homeopathy, dowsing, psychokinesis, faith healing, clairvoyance, or ufology are either pseudosciences or at least lack the epistemic warrant to be taken seriously.
britannica.com
- Enciclopedia Britannica on line , http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9026809/creationism .
doi.org
- Greener, M (decembrie 2007). „Taking on creationism. Which arguments and evidence counter pseudoscience?”. EMBO Rep. 8 (12): 1107–9. doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7401131. ISSN 1469-221X. PMC 2267227
. PMID 18059309. - NAS 1999, p. R9 National Academy of Sciences (). Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences (ed. 2nd). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. doi:10.17226/6024. ISBN 978-0-309-06406-4. LCCN 99006259. OCLC 43803228. PMID 25101403. Accesat în .
earlychurch.org.uk
- Paul Copan Is Creatio Ex Nihilo A Post-Biblical Invention? An Examination Of Gerhard May's Proposal Trinity Journal 17.1 (Spring 1996): 77–93.
gandul.ro
- Veress, Robert (). „Creaționismul nu se va preda în școli ca disciplină științifică”. Gândul. Accesat în .
kva.se
biologi.kva.se
- Futuyma, Douglas J. „Evolutionary Science, Creationism, and Society” (PDF). "Evolution" (2005). Arhivat din original (PDF) la . Accesat în .
loc.gov
lccn.loc.gov
- NAS 1999, p. R9 National Academy of Sciences (). Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences (ed. 2nd). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. doi:10.17226/6024. ISBN 978-0-309-06406-4. LCCN 99006259. OCLC 43803228. PMID 25101403. Accesat în .
- Okasha 2002, p. 127. Okasha's full statement is that "virtually all professional biologists regard creation science as a sham – a dishonest and misguided attempt to promote religious beliefs under the guise of science, with extremely harmful educational consequences." Okasha, Samir (). Philosophy of Science: A Very Short Introduction. Very Short Introductions. 67. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-280283-5. LCCN 2002510456. OCLC 48932644.
nap.edu
- NAS 1999, p. R9 National Academy of Sciences (). Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences (ed. 2nd). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. doi:10.17226/6024. ISBN 978-0-309-06406-4. LCCN 99006259. OCLC 43803228. PMID 25101403. Accesat în .
- Academia Americană de Științe, documentul Science, Evolution and Creationism - http://www.nap.edu/nap-cgi/execsumm.cgi?record_id=11876 Arhivat în , la Wayback Machine. But creationism is not science. Creationist arguments are based on beliefs about an entity outside the natural world.)
- Committee on Revising Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Sciences and Institute of Medicine of the National Academies (). Science, Evolution, and Creationism (ed. free pdf download). Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. pp. 10–12. ISBN 0-309-10586-2. Accesat în .
In science, explanations must be based on naturally occurring phenomena. Natural causes are, in principle, reproducible and therefore can be checked independently by others. If explanations are based on purported forces that are outside of nature, scientists have no way of either confirming or disproving those explanations.
- Poziția Academiei Naționale de Științe a Statelor Unite ale Americii privitoare la Creaționism , http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=6024&page=R9
ncse.com
- Matsumura, Molleen; Mead, Louise (). „10 Significant Court Decisions Regarding Evolution/Creationism”. National Center for Science Education. Accesat în .
nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Greener, M (decembrie 2007). „Taking on creationism. Which arguments and evidence counter pseudoscience?”. EMBO Rep. 8 (12): 1107–9. doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7401131. ISSN 1469-221X. PMC 2267227 . PMID 18059309.
- NAS 1999, p. R9 National Academy of Sciences (). Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences (ed. 2nd). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. doi:10.17226/6024. ISBN 978-0-309-06406-4. LCCN 99006259. OCLC 43803228. PMID 25101403. Accesat în .
royalsoc.ac.uk
- „Royal Society statement on evolution, creationism and intelligent design”. royalsoc.ac.uk. . Arhivat din originalul de la . Accesat în .
scienceblogs.com
- Myers, P.Z. (). „Pharyngula: Ann Coulter: No evidence for evolution?”. scienceblogs.com. Arhivat din original la . Accesat în .
talkorigins.org
- „An Index to Creationist Claims”. Accesat în .
web.archive.org
- Amicus Curiae Brief Of 72 Nobel Laureates, 17 State Academies Of Science, And 7 Other Scientific Organizations la Wayback Machine, Edwards v. Aguillard
- Academia Americană de Științe, documentul Science, Evolution and Creationism - http://www.nap.edu/nap-cgi/execsumm.cgi?record_id=11876 Arhivat în , la Wayback Machine. But creationism is not science. Creationist arguments are based on beliefs about an entity outside the natural world.)
- Futuyma, Douglas J. „Evolutionary Science, Creationism, and Society” (PDF). "Evolution" (2005). Arhivat din original (PDF) la . Accesat în .
- „Royal Society statement on evolution, creationism and intelligent design”. royalsoc.ac.uk. . Arhivat din originalul de la . Accesat în .
- Myers, P.Z. (). „Pharyngula: Ann Coulter: No evidence for evolution?”. scienceblogs.com. Arhivat din original la . Accesat în .
worldcat.org
- Greener, M (decembrie 2007). „Taking on creationism. Which arguments and evidence counter pseudoscience?”. EMBO Rep. 8 (12): 1107–9. doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7401131. ISSN 1469-221X. PMC 2267227 . PMID 18059309.
- NAS 1999, p. R9 National Academy of Sciences (). Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences (ed. 2nd). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. doi:10.17226/6024. ISBN 978-0-309-06406-4. LCCN 99006259. OCLC 43803228. PMID 25101403. Accesat în .
- Okasha 2002, p. 127. Okasha's full statement is that "virtually all professional biologists regard creation science as a sham – a dishonest and misguided attempt to promote religious beliefs under the guise of science, with extremely harmful educational consequences." Okasha, Samir (). Philosophy of Science: A Very Short Introduction. Very Short Introductions. 67. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-280283-5. LCCN 2002510456. OCLC 48932644.