Design inteligent (Romanian Wikipedia)
Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Design inteligent" in Romanian language version.
refsWebsite
Global rank
Romanian rank
1st place
1st place
3rd place
6th place
5th place
11th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
102nd place
537th place
14th place
121st place
40th place
16th place
18th place
27th place
3,169th place
low place
low place
low place
139th place
416th place
7th place
25th place
907th place
2,361st place
low place
low place
1,162nd place
2,189th place
low place
low place
330th place
2,104th place
580th place
396th place
34th place
147th place
3,040th place
740th place
1,925th place
6,100th place
179th place
36th place
1,478th place
4,920th place
571st place
3,187th place
aaas.org
- Q & A on Evolution and Intelligent Design AAAS. Citat: „Q & A on Evolution and Intelligent Design: Is intelligent design a scientific alternative to contemporary evolutionary theory? No. Intelligent design proponents may use the language of science, but they do not use its methodology. They have yet to propose meaningful tests for their claims, there are no reports of current research on these hypotheses at relevant scientific society meetings, and there is no body of research on these hypotheses published in relevant scientific journals. So, intelligent design has not been demonstrated to be a scientific theory.”
aaup.org
- Forrest, B (). „Wedging Creationism into the Academy”. American Association of University Professors. Arhivat din original la . Accesat în .
abc.net.au
- „Science Show: The Steve Project”. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. . Arhivat din original la . Accesat în .
achievement.org
- „Francis S. Collins, M.D., Ph.D. Biography and Interview”. www.achievement.org. American Academy of Achievement.
archive.today
- Boudry, M.; Blancke, S.; Braeckman, J. (). „Irreducible Incoherence and Intelligent Design: A Look into the Conceptual Toolbox of a Pseudoscience”. The Quarterly Review of Biology. 85 (4): 473–82. doi:10.1086/656904. hdl:1854/LU-952482. PMID 21243965. available from Irreducible incoherence and intelligent design: a look into the conceptual toolbox of a pseudoscience, Universiteit Gent, pdf Arhivat în , la Archive.is
berkeley.edu
sciencereview.berkeley.edu
- D’Agostino, Michelangelo (). „In the matter of Berkeley v. Berkeley”. Arhivat din original la .
The essence of his argument was that the logical structure of the evolution debate is framed in such a way as to favor evolution from the outset; scientists “have to rely on a definition of science that does not permit an alternative to naturalistic evolution.”
biologos.org
- Potts, Rick () [14 ianuarie 2019]. „Is evolution a "theory in crisis"? - Common-questions”. BioLogos. Accesat în .
- „About The BioLogos Foundation”. The Biologos Foundation. Accesat în .
We embrace the historical Christian faith, upholding the authority and inspiration of the Bible. We affirm evolutionary creation, recognizing God as Creator of all life over billions of years. We seek truth, ever learning as we study the natural world and the Bible.
books.google.com
- Mahner, Martin (). Pigliucci, Massimo; Boudry, Maarten, ed. Philosophy of pseudoscience reconsidering the demarcation problem (ed. Online-Ausg.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 30–31. ISBN 9780226051826. Accesat în .
Despite the lack of generally accepted demarcation criteria, we find remarkable agreement among virtually all philosophers and scientists that fields like astrology, creationism, homeopathy, dowsing, psychokinesis, faith healing, clairvoyance, or ufology are either pseudosciences or at least lack the epistemic warrant to be taken seriously.
- Forrest, Barbara; Gross, Paul R. (). Creationism's Trojan Horse: The Wedge of Intelligent Design. Oxford University Press. p. 11. ISBN 978-0-19-531973-6.
- Alexander, Denis; Numbers, Ronald L. (). Biology and Ideology from Descartes to Dawkins. University of Chicago Press. p. 328. ISBN 978-0-226-60840-2.
- Jennings, Byron K. (). In Defense of Scientism: An Insider's view of Science. Byron Jennings. p. 60. ISBN 978-0-9940589-2-8.
- Dembski, William (). „18. Evil, Creation and Intelligent Design”. În Meister, Chad; Dew, Jr., James K. God and Evil: The Case for God in a World Filled with Pain (în engleză). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press. p. 263. ISBN 9780830866465. OCLC 858358369.
- Dixon 2008, p. 82. Dixon, Thomas (). Science and Religion: A Very Short Introduction. OUP Oxford. p. 82. ISBN 978-0-19-929551-7.
- Hammer, Olav (). Claiming Knowledge: Strategies of Epistemology from Theosophy to the New Age. BRILL. p. 205. ISBN 90-04-13638-X.
- Keul, István (). Asian Religions, Technology and Science. Taylor & Francis. p. 88. ISBN 978-1-317-67447-4.
britannica.com
- Ayala, Francisco Jose (). „evolution - Intelligent design and its critics”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Accesat în .
canada.com
- Meyer, Stephen C. (). „Not by chance”. National Post. Don Mills, Ontario: CanWest MediaWorks Publications Inc. Arhivat din original la . Accesat în .
catholicnewsagency.com
- „Human genome and embryology experts named to Pontifical Academy of Sciences”. Catholic News Agency. Accesat în .
centerforinquiry.net
- Barbara Forrest. Washington, D.C.: Center for Inquiry, Office of Public Policy. Understanding the Intelligent Design Creationist Movement: Its True Nature and Goals. [PDF]; 2007 May [archived 2011-05-19; cited 2007-08-06].
chronicle.com
- Plantinga, Alvin (). „Evolution, Shibboleths, and Philosophers”. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Accesat în .
ctlibrary.com
- *Meyer, Stephen C.; Nelson, Paul A. (). „Getting Rid of the Unfair Rules”. Origins & Design (Book review). Accesat în .
- Johnson, Phillip E. (). „Third-Party Science”. Books & Culture (Book review). 2 (3). Arhivat din original la . Accesat în .
dickinson.edu
- „Of Dover and Design”. Dickinson College. . Accesat în .
What Phyllis Schlafly said, in effect, was that George Bush was elected by evangelical Christians, John Jones was appointed by George Bush and, therefore, he should disregard precedent and decide the case in a way that is inconsistent with the law.
- „Meet the Trustees”. Dickinson College. . Accesat în .
discovery.org
-
- Discovery Institute. Top Questions-1.What is the theory of intelligent design? [cited 2012-06-16].
- „A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism” (PDF). septembrie 2001. Arhivat din original (PDF) la . Accesat în .
- Staff, Discovery Institute (). „Ranks of Scientists Doubting Darwin's Theory on the Rise”. Discovery Institute. Arhivat din original la . Accesat în .
- Project Steve – Establishing the Obvious: A Response to the NCSE, William Dembski, Center for Science and Culture, Discovery Institute, 19 martie 2003.
- *Meyer, Stephen C.; Nelson, Paul A. (). „Getting Rid of the Unfair Rules”. Origins & Design (Book review). Accesat în .
- Johnson, Phillip E. (). „Third-Party Science”. Books & Culture (Book review). 2 (3). Arhivat din original la . Accesat în .
doi.org
- Padian, K.; Matzke, N. (). „Darwin, Dover, 'Intelligent Design' and textbooks”. Biochemical Journal. 417 (1): 29–42. doi:10.1042/bj20081534. PMID 19061485. .pdf
- Boudry, M.; Blancke, S.; Braeckman, J. (). „Irreducible Incoherence and Intelligent Design: A Look into the Conceptual Toolbox of a Pseudoscience”. The Quarterly Review of Biology. 85 (4): 473–82. doi:10.1086/656904. hdl:1854/LU-952482. PMID 21243965. available from Irreducible incoherence and intelligent design: a look into the conceptual toolbox of a pseudoscience, Universiteit Gent, pdf Arhivat în , la Archive.is
- Scott, Eugenie C.; Matzke, Nicholas J. (). „Biological design in science classrooms”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 104 (Suppl 1): 8669–8676. Bibcode:2007PNAS..104.8669S. doi:10.1073/pnas.0701505104
. PMC 1876445 . PMID 17494747. abstract - Burton, Elise K. (). „Evolution and Creationism in Middle Eastern Education: A New Perspective”. Evolution. Wiley. 65 (1): 301–304. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01113.x. ISSN 0014-3820. PMID 20812978.
evolutionnews.org
- Crowther, Robert (). „Dissent From Darwinism "Goes Global" as Over 600 Scientists Around the World Express Their Doubts About Darwinian Evolution”. Arhivat din original la . Accesat în .
handle.net
hdl.handle.net
- Boudry, M.; Blancke, S.; Braeckman, J. (). „Irreducible Incoherence and Intelligent Design: A Look into the Conceptual Toolbox of a Pseudoscience”. The Quarterly Review of Biology. 85 (4): 473–82. doi:10.1086/656904. hdl:1854/LU-952482. PMID 21243965. available from Irreducible incoherence and intelligent design: a look into the conceptual toolbox of a pseudoscience, Universiteit Gent, pdf Arhivat în , la Archive.is
harvard.edu
adsabs.harvard.edu
lehigh.edu
- „Department Position on Evolution and "Intelligent Design"”. Department of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University. Arhivat din original la . Accesat în .
loc.gov
lccn.loc.gov
- Pigliucci 2010 Pigliucci, Massimo (). „Science in the Courtroom: The Case against Intelligent Design” (PDF). Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. pp. 160–186. ISBN 978-0-226-66786-7. LCCN 2009049778. OCLC 457149439. Arhivat din original (PDF) la . Accesat în .
- Gonzalez, Guillermo; Richards, Jay W. (). The Privileged Planet: How Our Place in the Cosmos is Designed for Discovery. Washington, D.C.: Regnery Publishing. ISBN 978-0-89526-065-9. LCCN 2004000421. OCLC 54046478.
- Stenger, Victor J. (). The Fallacy of Fine-Tuning: Why the Universe Is Not Designed for Us. Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books. ISBN 978-1-61614-443-2. LCCN 2010049901. OCLC 679931691.
- Susskind, Leonard (). The Cosmic Landscape: String Theory and the Illusion of Intelligent Design (ed. 1st). New York: Little, Brown and Company. ISBN 978-0-316-15579-3. LCCN 2005018796. OCLC 60798474.
ncse.com
- Pigliucci 2010 Pigliucci, Massimo (). „Science in the Courtroom: The Case against Intelligent Design” (PDF). Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. pp. 160–186. ISBN 978-0-226-66786-7. LCCN 2009049778. OCLC 457149439. Arhivat din original (PDF) la . Accesat în .
- Evans, Skip (). „Doubting Darwinism Through Creative License”. NCSE. Accesat în .
- „List of Steves”. National Center for Science Education. . Arhivat din original la . Accesat în .
nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Padian, K.; Matzke, N. (). „Darwin, Dover, 'Intelligent Design' and textbooks”. Biochemical Journal. 417 (1): 29–42. doi:10.1042/bj20081534. PMID 19061485. .pdf
- Boudry, M.; Blancke, S.; Braeckman, J. (). „Irreducible Incoherence and Intelligent Design: A Look into the Conceptual Toolbox of a Pseudoscience”. The Quarterly Review of Biology. 85 (4): 473–82. doi:10.1086/656904. hdl:1854/LU-952482. PMID 21243965. available from Irreducible incoherence and intelligent design: a look into the conceptual toolbox of a pseudoscience, Universiteit Gent, pdf Arhivat în , la Archive.is
- Scott, Eugenie C.; Matzke, Nicholas J. (). „Biological design in science classrooms”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 104 (Suppl 1): 8669–8676. Bibcode:2007PNAS..104.8669S. doi:10.1073/pnas.0701505104 . PMC 1876445 . PMID 17494747. abstract
- Burton, Elise K. (). „Evolution and Creationism in Middle Eastern Education: A New Perspective”. Evolution. Wiley. 65 (1): 301–304. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01113.x. ISSN 0014-3820. PMID 20812978.
nih.gov
- „Francis Collins to step down as director of the National Institutes of Health”. National Institutes of Health (NIH) (în engleză). . Accesat în .
ntskeptics.org
- Padian, K.; Matzke, N. (). „Darwin, Dover, 'Intelligent Design' and textbooks”. Biochemical Journal. 417 (1): 29–42. doi:10.1042/bj20081534. PMID 19061485. .pdf
- Chang, Kenneth (). „Few Biologists But Many Evangelicals Sign Anti-Evolution Petition”. The New York Times. Arhivat din original la . Accesat în .; available without login
nwsource.com
seattletimes.nwsource.com
- Westneat D (). „Evolving opinion of one man”. The Seattle Times. Arhivat din original la .
nytimes.com
- Chang, Kenneth (). „Few Biologists But Many Evangelicals Sign Anti-Evolution Petition”. The New York Times. Arhivat din original la . Accesat în .; available without login
pnas.org
stanford.edu
plato.stanford.edu
- Ruse, Michael () [30 August 2003]. „Creationism”. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Accesat în .
thedailybeast.com
- Giberson, Karl W. (). „My Debate With an 'Intelligent Design' Theorist”. The Daily Beast. New York: The Newsweek Daily Beast Company. Accesat în .
timesofisrael.com
- AP; TOI STAFF (). „Iran bans sale of Israeli author accused of Darwinism, Zionism”. The Times of Israel. Accesat în .
ucla.edu
cogweb.ucla.edu
- H. Allen Orr "Darwin v. Intelligent Design (Again)", Boston Review, Commentary, September 1996.
ugent.be
biblio.ugent.be
- Boudry, M.; Blancke, S.; Braeckman, J. (). „Irreducible Incoherence and Intelligent Design: A Look into the Conceptual Toolbox of a Pseudoscience”. The Quarterly Review of Biology. 85 (4): 473–82. doi:10.1086/656904. hdl:1854/LU-952482. PMID 21243965. available from Irreducible incoherence and intelligent design: a look into the conceptual toolbox of a pseudoscience, Universiteit Gent, pdf Arhivat în , la Archive.is
washingtonpost.com
- „Obama picks Francis Collins as new NIH Director”. Washington Post. . Accesat în .
web.archive.org
- Barbara Forrest. Washington, D.C.: Center for Inquiry, Office of Public Policy. Understanding the Intelligent Design Creationist Movement: Its True Nature and Goals. [PDF]; 2007 May [archived 2011-05-19; cited 2007-08-06].
- Pigliucci 2010 Pigliucci, Massimo (). „Science in the Courtroom: The Case against Intelligent Design” (PDF). Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. pp. 160–186. ISBN 978-0-226-66786-7. LCCN 2009049778. OCLC 457149439. Arhivat din original (PDF) la . Accesat în .
- „A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism” (PDF). septembrie 2001. Arhivat din original (PDF) la . Accesat în .
- Crowther, Robert (). „Dissent From Darwinism "Goes Global" as Over 600 Scientists Around the World Express Their Doubts About Darwinian Evolution”. Arhivat din original la . Accesat în .
- Staff, Discovery Institute (). „Ranks of Scientists Doubting Darwin's Theory on the Rise”. Discovery Institute. Arhivat din original la . Accesat în .
- „Science Show: The Steve Project”. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. . Arhivat din original la . Accesat în .
- Chang, Kenneth (). „Few Biologists But Many Evangelicals Sign Anti-Evolution Petition”. The New York Times. Arhivat din original la . Accesat în .; available without login
- Westneat D (). „Evolving opinion of one man”. The Seattle Times. Arhivat din original la .
- Forrest, B (). „Wedging Creationism into the Academy”. American Association of University Professors. Arhivat din original la . Accesat în .
- „List of Steves”. National Center for Science Education. . Arhivat din original la . Accesat în .
- „Department Position on Evolution and "Intelligent Design"”. Department of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University. Arhivat din original la . Accesat în .
- Meyer, Stephen C. (). „Not by chance”. National Post. Don Mills, Ontario: CanWest MediaWorks Publications Inc. Arhivat din original la . Accesat în .
- *Meyer, Stephen C.; Nelson, Paul A. (). „Getting Rid of the Unfair Rules”. Origins & Design (Book review). Accesat în .
- Johnson, Phillip E. (). „Third-Party Science”. Books & Culture (Book review). 2 (3). Arhivat din original la . Accesat în .
- D’Agostino, Michelangelo (). „In the matter of Berkeley v. Berkeley”. Arhivat din original la .
The essence of his argument was that the logical structure of the evolution debate is framed in such a way as to favor evolution from the outset; scientists “have to rely on a definition of science that does not permit an alternative to naturalistic evolution.”
- Marcel Roes, „INTELLIGENT DESIGN”, 3 iunie 2005, Folia Civitatis 37/anul 58, Universitatea din Amsterdam, p. 3. https://web.archive.org/web/20051226170906/http://www.foliacivitatis.nl/pfd/folia37_58.pdf
wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
worldcat.org
- Pigliucci 2010 Pigliucci, Massimo (). „Science in the Courtroom: The Case against Intelligent Design” (PDF). Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. pp. 160–186. ISBN 978-0-226-66786-7. LCCN 2009049778. OCLC 457149439. Arhivat din original (PDF) la . Accesat în .
- Gonzalez, Guillermo; Richards, Jay W. (). The Privileged Planet: How Our Place in the Cosmos is Designed for Discovery. Washington, D.C.: Regnery Publishing. ISBN 978-0-89526-065-9. LCCN 2004000421. OCLC 54046478.
- Stenger, Victor J. (). The Fallacy of Fine-Tuning: Why the Universe Is Not Designed for Us. Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books. ISBN 978-1-61614-443-2. LCCN 2010049901. OCLC 679931691.
- Susskind, Leonard (). The Cosmic Landscape: String Theory and the Illusion of Intelligent Design (ed. 1st). New York: Little, Brown and Company. ISBN 978-0-316-15579-3. LCCN 2005018796. OCLC 60798474.
- Dembski, William (). „18. Evil, Creation and Intelligent Design”. În Meister, Chad; Dew, Jr., James K. God and Evil: The Case for God in a World Filled with Pain (în engleză). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press. p. 263. ISBN 9780830866465. OCLC 858358369.
- Burton, Elise K. (). „Evolution and Creationism in Middle Eastern Education: A New Perspective”. Evolution. Wiley. 65 (1): 301–304. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01113.x. ISSN 0014-3820. PMID 20812978.