Design inteligent (Romanian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Design inteligent" in Romanian language version.

Last modified: 07:32:25, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Ref.Un. Ref.Website

Global rank Romanian rank

1917web.archive.org

1^st place

88worldcat.org

4^th place

9^th place

88books.google.com

3^rd place

8^th place

76doi.org

2^nd place

3^rd place

65nih.gov

5^th place

6^th place

55discovery.org

low place

44loc.gov

63^rd place

36^th place

43ncse.com

low place

41ucla.edu

885^th place

892^nd place

32ntskeptics.org

low place

32dickinson.edu

low place

8,517^th place

22adsabs.harvard.edu

14^th place

29^th place

22biologos.org

low place

22washingtonpost.com

35^th place

112^th place

21britannica.com

37^th place

27^th place

21berkeley.edu

621^st place

552^nd place

11centerforinquiry.net

low place

11ugent.be

3,681^st place

2,024^th place

11hdl.handle.net

66^th place

249^th place

11archive.today

28^th place

82^nd place

11pnas.org

1,411^th place

1,038^th place

11chronicle.com

3,373^rd place

4,518^th place

11aaas.org

6,319^th place

3,985^th place

11evolutionnews.org

low place

11abc.net.au

120^th place

397^th place

11nytimes.com

7^th place

24^th place

11nwsource.com

1,828^th place

1,889^th place

11aaup.org

low place

11lehigh.edu

low place

11canada.com

1,459^th place

2,280^th place

11thedailybeast.com

517^th place

822^nd place

11catholicnewsagency.com

2,558^th place

2,571^st place

11achievement.org

3,458^th place

4,405^th place

11archive.org

6^th place

19^th place

11stanford.edu

194^th place

60^th place

11findlaw.com

2,070^th place

4,729^th place

11timesofisrael.com

268^th place

610^th place

aaas.org (Global: 6,319^th place; Romanian: 3,985^th place)

Q & A on Evolution and Intelligent Design AAAS. Citat: „Q & A on Evolution and Intelligent Design: Is intelligent design a scientific alternative to contemporary evolutionary theory? No. Intelligent design proponents may use the language of science, but they do not use its methodology. They have yet to propose meaningful tests for their claims, there are no reports of current research on these hypotheses at relevant scientific society meetings, and there is no body of research on these hypotheses published in relevant scientific journals. So, intelligent design has not been demonstrated to be a scientific theory.”

aaup.org (Global: low place; Romanian: low place)

Forrest, B (1 mai 2005). „Wedging Creationism into the Academy”. American Association of University Professors. Arhivat din original la 29 iulie 2007. Accesat în 12 iulie 2008.

abc.net.au (Global: 120^th place; Romanian: 397^th place)

„Science Show: The Steve Project”. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. 3 august 2003. Arhivat din original la 5 martie 2011. Accesat în 25 aprilie 2011.

achievement.org (Global: 3,458^th place; Romanian: 4,405^th place)

„Francis S. Collins, M.D., Ph.D. Biography and Interview”. www.achievement.org. American Academy of Achievement.

adsabs.harvard.edu (Global: 14^th place; Romanian: 29^th place)

Scott, Eugenie C.; Matzke, Nicholas J. (15 mai 2007). „Biological design in science classrooms”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 104 (Suppl 1): 8669–8676. Bibcode:2007PNAS..104.8669S. doi:10.1073/pnas.0701505104 . PMC 1876445 . PMID 17494747. abstract
Lents, Nathan H.; Swamidass, S. Joshua; Lenski, Richard E. (8 februarie 2019). „The end of evolution?”. Science. 363 (6427): 590. Bibcode:2019Sci...363..590L. doi:10.1126/science.aaw4056. ISSN 0036-8075.

archive.org (Global: 6^th place; Romanian: 19^th place)

Lents, Nathan H.; Swamidass, S. Joshua; Lenski, Richard E. (8 februarie 2019). „The end of evolution?”. Science. 363 (6427): 590. Bibcode:2019Sci...363..590L. doi:10.1126/science.aaw4056. ISSN 0036-8075.

archive.today (Global: 28^th place; Romanian: 82^nd place)

Boudry, M.; Blancke, S.; Braeckman, J. (2010). „Irreducible Incoherence and Intelligent Design: A Look into the Conceptual Toolbox of a Pseudoscience”. The Quarterly Review of Biology. 85 (4): 473–82. doi:10.1086/656904. hdl:1854/LU-952482. PMID 21243965. available from Irreducible incoherence and intelligent design: a look into the conceptual toolbox of a pseudoscience, Universiteit Gent, pdf Arhivat în 13 iulie 2015, la Archive.is

berkeley.edu (Global: 621^st place; Romanian: 552^nd place)

sciencereview.berkeley.edu

D’Agostino, Michelangelo (15 mai 2006). „In the matter of Berkeley v. Berkeley”. Arhivat din original la 9 iunie 2007. The essence of his argument was that the logical structure of the evolution debate is framed in such a way as to favor evolution from the outset; scientists "have to rely on a definition of science that does not permit an alternative to naturalistic evolution."

biologos.org (Global: low place; Romanian: low place)

Potts, Rick (5 februarie 2020) [14 ianuarie 2019]. „Is evolution a "theory in crisis"? - Common-questions”. BioLogos. Arhivat din original la 2 iunie 2021. Accesat în 2 iunie 2021.
„About The BioLogos Foundation”. The Biologos Foundation. Arhivat din original la 29 august 2011. Accesat în 3 mai 2014. We embrace the historical Christian faith, upholding the authority and inspiration of the Bible. We affirm evolutionary creation, recognizing God as Creator of all life over billions of years. We seek truth, ever learning as we study the natural world and the Bible.

books.google.com (Global: 3^rd place; Romanian: 8^th place)

Mahner, Martin (2013). Pigliucci, Massimo; Boudry, Maarten, ed. Philosophy of pseudoscience reconsidering the demarcation problem (ed. Online-Ausg.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 30–31. ISBN 9780226051826. Accesat în 18 aprilie 2018. Despite the lack of generally accepted demarcation criteria, we find remarkable agreement among virtually all philosophers and scientists that fields like astrology, creationism, homeopathy, dowsing, psychokinesis, faith healing, clairvoyance, or ufology are either pseudosciences or at least lack the epistemic warrant to be taken seriously.
Forrest, Barbara; Gross, Paul R. (2007). Creationism's Trojan Horse: The Wedge of Intelligent Design. Oxford University Press. p. 11. ISBN 978-0-19-531973-6.
Alexander, Denis; Numbers, Ronald L. (2010). Biology and Ideology from Descartes to Dawkins. University of Chicago Press. p. 328. ISBN 978-0-226-60840-2.
Jennings, Byron K. (2015). In Defense of Scientism: An Insider's view of Science. Byron Jennings. p. 60. ISBN 978-0-9940589-2-8.
Dembski, William (2013). „18. Evil, Creation and Intelligent Design”. În Meister, Chad; Dew, Jr., James K. God and Evil: The Case for God in a World Filled with Pain (în engleză). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press. p. 263. ISBN 9780830866465. OCLC 858358369.
Dixon 2008, p. 82. Dixon, Thomas (2008). Science and Religion: A Very Short Introduction. OUP Oxford. p. 82. ISBN 978-0-19-929551-7.
Hammer, Olav (2003). Claiming Knowledge: Strategies of Epistemology from Theosophy to the New Age. BRILL. p. 205. ISBN 90-04-13638-X.
Keul, István (2015). Asian Religions, Technology and Science. Taylor & Francis. p. 88. ISBN 978-1-317-67447-4.

britannica.com (Global: 37^th place; Romanian: 27^th place)

Ayala, Francisco Jose (27 mai 2021). „evolution - Intelligent design and its critics”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Accesat în 22 iunie 2021.

canada.com (Global: 1,459^th place; Romanian: 2,280^th place)

Meyer, Stephen C. (1 decembrie 2005). „Not by chance”. National Post. Don Mills, Ontario: CanWest MediaWorks Publications Inc. Arhivat din original la 1 mai 2006. Accesat în 28 februarie 2014.

catholicnewsagency.com (Global: 2,558^th place; Romanian: 2,571^st place)

„Human genome and embryology experts named to Pontifical Academy of Sciences”. Catholic News Agency. Arhivat din original la 31 iulie 2020. Accesat în 5 ianuarie 2018.

centerforinquiry.net (Global: low place; Romanian: low place)

Barbara Forrest. Washington, D.C.: Center for Inquiry, Office of Public Policy. Understanding the Intelligent Design Creationist Movement: Its True Nature and Goals. [PDF]; 2007 May [archived 2011-05-19; cited 2007-08-06].

chronicle.com (Global: 3,373^rd place; Romanian: 4,518^th place)

Plantinga, Alvin (11 aprilie 2010). „Evolution, Shibboleths, and Philosophers”. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Accesat în 28 aprilie 2010.

dickinson.edu (Global: low place; Romanian: 8,517^th place)

„Of Dover and Design”. Dickinson College. 20 mai 2014. Accesat în 8 ianuarie 2022. What Phyllis Schlafly said, in effect, was that George Bush was elected by evangelical Christians, John Jones was appointed by George Bush and, therefore, he should disregard precedent and decide the case in a way that is inconsistent with the law.
„Meet the Trustees”. Dickinson College. 20 februarie 2017. Accesat în 8 ianuarie 2022.

discovery.org (Global: low place; Romanian: low place)

- Discovery Institute. Top Questions-1.What is the theory of intelligent design? [cited 2012-06-16].
- „A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism” (PDF). septembrie 2001. Arhivat din original (PDF) la 30 septembrie 2007. Accesat în 30 octombrie 2007.
- Staff, Discovery Institute (8 martie 2007). „Ranks of Scientists Doubting Darwin's Theory on the Rise”. Discovery Institute. Arhivat din original la 23 octombrie 2007. Accesat în 30 octombrie 2007.
- Project Steve – Establishing the Obvious: A Response to the NCSE, William Dembski, Center for Science and Culture, Discovery Institute, 19 martie 2003.
- - Meyer, Stephen C.; Nelson, Paul A. (1 mai 1996). „Getting Rid of the Unfair Rules”. Origins & Design (Book review). Accesat în 20 mai 2007.

doi.org (Global: 2^nd place; Romanian: 3^rd place)

Padian, K.; Matzke, N. (2009). „Darwin, Dover, 'Intelligent Design' and textbooks”. Biochemical Journal. 417 (1): 29–42. doi:10.1042/bj20081534. PMID 19061485. .pdf
Boudry, M.; Blancke, S.; Braeckman, J. (2010). „Irreducible Incoherence and Intelligent Design: A Look into the Conceptual Toolbox of a Pseudoscience”. The Quarterly Review of Biology. 85 (4): 473–82. doi:10.1086/656904. hdl:1854/LU-952482. PMID 21243965. available from Irreducible incoherence and intelligent design: a look into the conceptual toolbox of a pseudoscience, Universiteit Gent, pdf Arhivat în 13 iulie 2015, la Archive.is
Scott, Eugenie C.; Matzke, Nicholas J. (15 mai 2007). „Biological design in science classrooms”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 104 (Suppl 1): 8669–8676. Bibcode:2007PNAS..104.8669S. doi:10.1073/pnas.0701505104 . PMC 1876445 . PMID 17494747. abstract
Lents, Nathan H.; Swamidass, S. Joshua; Lenski, Richard E. (8 februarie 2019). „The end of evolution?”. Science. 363 (6427): 590. Bibcode:2019Sci...363..590L. doi:10.1126/science.aaw4056. ISSN 0036-8075.
Lang, Gregory I.; Rice, Amber M. (aprilie 2019). „Evolution unscathed: Darwin Devolves argues on weak reasoning that unguided evolution is a destructive force, incapable of innovation”. Evolution. 73 (4): 862–868. doi:10.1111/evo.13710 . ISSN 0014-3820.
Burton, Elise K. (29 septembrie 2010). „Evolution and Creationism in Middle Eastern Education: A New Perspective”. Evolution. Wiley. 65 (1): 301–304. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01113.x. ISSN 0014-3820. PMID 20812978.

evolutionnews.org (Global: low place; Romanian: low place)

Crowther, Robert (21 iunie 2006). „Dissent From Darwinism "Goes Global" as Over 600 Scientists Around the World Express Their Doubts About Darwinian Evolution”. Arhivat din original la 17 noiembrie 2007. Accesat în 30 octombrie 2007.

findlaw.com (Global: 2,070^th place; Romanian: 4,729^th place)

caselaw.lp.findlaw.com

Marbury v Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)

hdl.handle.net (Global: 66^th place; Romanian: 249^th place)

Boudry, M.; Blancke, S.; Braeckman, J. (2010). „Irreducible Incoherence and Intelligent Design: A Look into the Conceptual Toolbox of a Pseudoscience”. The Quarterly Review of Biology. 85 (4): 473–82. doi:10.1086/656904. hdl:1854/LU-952482. PMID 21243965. available from Irreducible incoherence and intelligent design: a look into the conceptual toolbox of a pseudoscience, Universiteit Gent, pdf Arhivat în 13 iulie 2015, la Archive.is

lehigh.edu (Global: low place; Romanian: low place)

„Department Position on Evolution and "Intelligent Design"”. Department of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University. Arhivat din original la 13 octombrie 2005. Accesat în 25 iulie 2008.

loc.gov (Global: 63^rd place; Romanian: 36^th place)

lccn.loc.gov

Pigliucci 2010 Pigliucci, Massimo (2010). „Science in the Courtroom: The Case against Intelligent Design” (PDF). Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. pp. 160–186. ISBN 978-0-226-66786-7. LCCN 2009049778. OCLC 457149439. Arhivat din original (PDF) la 29 iunie 2017. Accesat în 13 iulie 2015.
Gonzalez, Guillermo; Richards, Jay W. (2004). The Privileged Planet: How Our Place in the Cosmos is Designed for Discovery. Washington, D.C.: Regnery Publishing. ISBN 978-0-89526-065-9. LCCN 2004000421. OCLC 54046478.
Stenger, Victor J. (2011). The Fallacy of Fine-Tuning: Why the Universe Is Not Designed for Us. Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books. ISBN 978-1-61614-443-2. LCCN 2010049901. OCLC 679931691.
Susskind, Leonard (2005). The Cosmic Landscape: String Theory and the Illusion of Intelligent Design (ed. 1st). New York: Little, Brown and Company. ISBN 978-0-316-15579-3. LCCN 2005018796. OCLC 60798474.

ncse.com (Global: low place; Romanian: low place)

Pigliucci 2010 Pigliucci, Massimo (2010). „Science in the Courtroom: The Case against Intelligent Design” (PDF). Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. pp. 160–186. ISBN 978-0-226-66786-7. LCCN 2009049778. OCLC 457149439. Arhivat din original (PDF) la 29 iunie 2017. Accesat în 13 iulie 2015.
Evans, Skip (29 noiembrie 2001). „Doubting Darwinism Through Creative License”. NCSE. Accesat în 25 aprilie 2011.
„List of Steves”. National Center for Science Education. 22 decembrie 2016. Arhivat din original la 28 august 2019. Accesat în 14 ianuarie 2017.

nih.gov (Global: 5^th place; Romanian: 6^th place)

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Padian, K.; Matzke, N. (2009). „Darwin, Dover, 'Intelligent Design' and textbooks”. Biochemical Journal. 417 (1): 29–42. doi:10.1042/bj20081534. PMID 19061485. .pdf
Boudry, M.; Blancke, S.; Braeckman, J. (2010). „Irreducible Incoherence and Intelligent Design: A Look into the Conceptual Toolbox of a Pseudoscience”. The Quarterly Review of Biology. 85 (4): 473–82. doi:10.1086/656904. hdl:1854/LU-952482. PMID 21243965. available from Irreducible incoherence and intelligent design: a look into the conceptual toolbox of a pseudoscience, Universiteit Gent, pdf Arhivat în 13 iulie 2015, la Archive.is
Scott, Eugenie C.; Matzke, Nicholas J. (15 mai 2007). „Biological design in science classrooms”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 104 (Suppl 1): 8669–8676. Bibcode:2007PNAS..104.8669S. doi:10.1073/pnas.0701505104 . PMC 1876445 . PMID 17494747. abstract
Burton, Elise K. (29 septembrie 2010). „Evolution and Creationism in Middle Eastern Education: A New Perspective”. Evolution. Wiley. 65 (1): 301–304. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01113.x. ISSN 0014-3820. PMID 20812978.

nih.gov

„Francis Collins to step down as director of the National Institutes of Health”. National Institutes of Health (NIH) (în engleză). 4 octombrie 2021. Accesat în 5 octombrie 2021.

ntskeptics.org (Global: low place; Romanian: low place)

Padian, K.; Matzke, N. (2009). „Darwin, Dover, 'Intelligent Design' and textbooks”. Biochemical Journal. 417 (1): 29–42. doi:10.1042/bj20081534. PMID 19061485. .pdf
Chang, Kenneth (21 februarie 2006). „Few Biologists But Many Evangelicals Sign Anti-Evolution Petition”. The New York Times. Arhivat din original la 9 mai 2015. Accesat în 4 ianuarie 2008. ; available without login

nwsource.com (Global: 1,828^th place; Romanian: 1,889^th place)

seattletimes.nwsource.com

Westneat D (24 august 2005). „Evolving opinion of one man”. The Seattle Times. Arhivat din original la 13 august 2006.

nytimes.com (Global: 7^th place; Romanian: 24^th place)

Chang, Kenneth (21 februarie 2006). „Few Biologists But Many Evangelicals Sign Anti-Evolution Petition”. The New York Times. Arhivat din original la 9 mai 2015. Accesat în 4 ianuarie 2008. ; available without login

pnas.org (Global: 1,411^th place; Romanian: 1,038^th place)

Scott, Eugenie C.; Matzke, Nicholas J. (15 mai 2007). „Biological design in science classrooms”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 104 (Suppl 1): 8669–8676. Bibcode:2007PNAS..104.8669S. doi:10.1073/pnas.0701505104 . PMC 1876445 . PMID 17494747. abstract

stanford.edu (Global: 194^th place; Romanian: 60^th place)

plato.stanford.edu

Ruse, Michael (21 septembrie 2018) [30 August 2003]. „Creationism”. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Accesat în 26 octombrie 2021.

thedailybeast.com (Global: 517^th place; Romanian: 822^nd place)

Giberson, Karl W. (21 aprilie 2014). „My Debate With an 'Intelligent Design' Theorist”. The Daily Beast. New York: The Newsweek Daily Beast Company. Accesat în 14 mai 2014.

timesofisrael.com (Global: 268^th place; Romanian: 610^th place)

AP; TOI STAFF (11 noiembrie 2019). „Iran bans sale of Israeli author accused of Darwinism, Zionism”. The Times of Israel. Accesat în 11 ianuarie 2020.

ucla.edu (Global: 885^th place; Romanian: 892^nd place)

cogweb.ucla.edu

H. Allen Orr "Darwin v. Intelligent Design (Again)", Boston Review, Commentary, September 1996.

ugent.be (Global: 3,681^st place; Romanian: 2,024^th place)

biblio.ugent.be

Boudry, M.; Blancke, S.; Braeckman, J. (2010). „Irreducible Incoherence and Intelligent Design: A Look into the Conceptual Toolbox of a Pseudoscience”. The Quarterly Review of Biology. 85 (4): 473–82. doi:10.1086/656904. hdl:1854/LU-952482. PMID 21243965. available from Irreducible incoherence and intelligent design: a look into the conceptual toolbox of a pseudoscience, Universiteit Gent, pdf Arhivat în 13 iulie 2015, la Archive.is

washingtonpost.com (Global: 35^th place; Romanian: 112^th place)

„Obama picks Francis Collins as new NIH Director”. Washington Post. 8 iulie 2009. Accesat în 16 octombrie 2011.
Coyne, Jerry A. (9 martie 2019). „Intelligent design gets even dumber”. The Washington Post. Accesat în 17 decembrie 2020.

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; Romanian: 1^st place)

Barbara Forrest. Washington, D.C.: Center for Inquiry, Office of Public Policy. Understanding the Intelligent Design Creationist Movement: Its True Nature and Goals. [PDF]; 2007 May [archived 2011-05-19; cited 2007-08-06].
Pigliucci 2010 Pigliucci, Massimo (2010). „Science in the Courtroom: The Case against Intelligent Design” (PDF). Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. pp. 160–186. ISBN 978-0-226-66786-7. LCCN 2009049778. OCLC 457149439. Arhivat din original (PDF) la 29 iunie 2017. Accesat în 13 iulie 2015.
„A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism” (PDF). septembrie 2001. Arhivat din original (PDF) la 30 septembrie 2007. Accesat în 30 octombrie 2007.
Crowther, Robert (21 iunie 2006). „Dissent From Darwinism "Goes Global" as Over 600 Scientists Around the World Express Their Doubts About Darwinian Evolution”. Arhivat din original la 17 noiembrie 2007. Accesat în 30 octombrie 2007.
Staff, Discovery Institute (8 martie 2007). „Ranks of Scientists Doubting Darwin's Theory on the Rise”. Discovery Institute. Arhivat din original la 23 octombrie 2007. Accesat în 30 octombrie 2007.
„Science Show: The Steve Project”. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. 3 august 2003. Arhivat din original la 5 martie 2011. Accesat în 25 aprilie 2011.
Chang, Kenneth (21 februarie 2006). „Few Biologists But Many Evangelicals Sign Anti-Evolution Petition”. The New York Times. Arhivat din original la 9 mai 2015. Accesat în 4 ianuarie 2008. ; available without login
Westneat D (24 august 2005). „Evolving opinion of one man”. The Seattle Times. Arhivat din original la 13 august 2006.
Forrest, B (1 mai 2005). „Wedging Creationism into the Academy”. American Association of University Professors. Arhivat din original la 29 iulie 2007. Accesat în 12 iulie 2008.
„List of Steves”. National Center for Science Education. 22 decembrie 2016. Arhivat din original la 28 august 2019. Accesat în 14 ianuarie 2017.
„Department Position on Evolution and "Intelligent Design"”. Department of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University. Arhivat din original la 13 octombrie 2005. Accesat în 25 iulie 2008.
Meyer, Stephen C. (1 decembrie 2005). „Not by chance”. National Post. Don Mills, Ontario: CanWest MediaWorks Publications Inc. Arhivat din original la 1 mai 2006. Accesat în 28 februarie 2014.
D’Agostino, Michelangelo (15 mai 2006). „In the matter of Berkeley v. Berkeley”. Arhivat din original la 9 iunie 2007. The essence of his argument was that the logical structure of the evolution debate is framed in such a way as to favor evolution from the outset; scientists "have to rely on a definition of science that does not permit an alternative to naturalistic evolution."
Potts, Rick (5 februarie 2020) [14 ianuarie 2019]. „Is evolution a "theory in crisis"? - Common-questions”. BioLogos. Arhivat din original la 2 iunie 2021. Accesat în 2 iunie 2021.
„About The BioLogos Foundation”. The Biologos Foundation. Arhivat din original la 29 august 2011. Accesat în 3 mai 2014. We embrace the historical Christian faith, upholding the authority and inspiration of the Bible. We affirm evolutionary creation, recognizing God as Creator of all life over billions of years. We seek truth, ever learning as we study the natural world and the Bible.
„Human genome and embryology experts named to Pontifical Academy of Sciences”. Catholic News Agency. Arhivat din original la 31 iulie 2020. Accesat în 5 ianuarie 2018.
Marcel Roes, „INTELLIGENT DESIGN”, 3 iunie 2005, Folia Civitatis 37/anul 58, Universitatea din Amsterdam, p. 3. https://web.archive.org/web/20051226170906/http://www.foliacivitatis.nl/pfd/folia37_58.pdf

worldcat.org (Global: 4^th place; Romanian: 9^th place)

Pigliucci 2010 Pigliucci, Massimo (2010). „Science in the Courtroom: The Case against Intelligent Design” (PDF). Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. pp. 160–186. ISBN 978-0-226-66786-7. LCCN 2009049778. OCLC 457149439. Arhivat din original (PDF) la 29 iunie 2017. Accesat în 13 iulie 2015.
Gonzalez, Guillermo; Richards, Jay W. (2004). The Privileged Planet: How Our Place in the Cosmos is Designed for Discovery. Washington, D.C.: Regnery Publishing. ISBN 978-0-89526-065-9. LCCN 2004000421. OCLC 54046478.
Stenger, Victor J. (2011). The Fallacy of Fine-Tuning: Why the Universe Is Not Designed for Us. Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books. ISBN 978-1-61614-443-2. LCCN 2010049901. OCLC 679931691.
Susskind, Leonard (2005). The Cosmic Landscape: String Theory and the Illusion of Intelligent Design (ed. 1st). New York: Little, Brown and Company. ISBN 978-0-316-15579-3. LCCN 2005018796. OCLC 60798474.
Lents, Nathan H.; Swamidass, S. Joshua; Lenski, Richard E. (8 februarie 2019). „The end of evolution?”. Science. 363 (6427): 590. Bibcode:2019Sci...363..590L. doi:10.1126/science.aaw4056. ISSN 0036-8075.
Lang, Gregory I.; Rice, Amber M. (aprilie 2019). „Evolution unscathed: Darwin Devolves argues on weak reasoning that unguided evolution is a destructive force, incapable of innovation”. Evolution. 73 (4): 862–868. doi:10.1111/evo.13710 . ISSN 0014-3820.
Dembski, William (2013). „18. Evil, Creation and Intelligent Design”. În Meister, Chad; Dew, Jr., James K. God and Evil: The Case for God in a World Filled with Pain (în engleză). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press. p. 263. ISBN 9780830866465. OCLC 858358369.
Burton, Elise K. (29 septembrie 2010). „Evolution and Creationism in Middle Eastern Education: A New Perspective”. Evolution. Wiley. 65 (1): 301–304. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01113.x. ISSN 0014-3820. PMID 20812978.

Design inteligent (Romanian Wikipedia)

aaas.org (Global: 6,319th place; Romanian: 3,985th place)

aaup.org (Global: low place; Romanian: low place)

abc.net.au (Global: 120th place; Romanian: 397th place)

achievement.org (Global: 3,458th place; Romanian: 4,405th place)

adsabs.harvard.edu (Global: 14th place; Romanian: 29th place)

archive.org (Global: 6th place; Romanian: 19th place)

archive.today (Global: 28th place; Romanian: 82nd place)

berkeley.edu (Global: 621st place; Romanian: 552nd place)

sciencereview.berkeley.edu

biologos.org (Global: low place; Romanian: low place)

books.google.com (Global: 3rd place; Romanian: 8th place)

britannica.com (Global: 37th place; Romanian: 27th place)

canada.com (Global: 1,459th place; Romanian: 2,280th place)

catholicnewsagency.com (Global: 2,558th place; Romanian: 2,571st place)

centerforinquiry.net (Global: low place; Romanian: low place)

chronicle.com (Global: 3,373rd place; Romanian: 4,518th place)

dickinson.edu (Global: low place; Romanian: 8,517th place)

discovery.org (Global: low place; Romanian: low place)

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; Romanian: 3rd place)

evolutionnews.org (Global: low place; Romanian: low place)

findlaw.com (Global: 2,070th place; Romanian: 4,729th place)

caselaw.lp.findlaw.com

hdl.handle.net (Global: 66th place; Romanian: 249th place)

lehigh.edu (Global: low place; Romanian: low place)

loc.gov (Global: 63rd place; Romanian: 36th place)

lccn.loc.gov

ncse.com (Global: low place; Romanian: low place)

nih.gov (Global: 5th place; Romanian: 6th place)

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

nih.gov

ntskeptics.org (Global: low place; Romanian: low place)

nwsource.com (Global: 1,828th place; Romanian: 1,889th place)

seattletimes.nwsource.com

nytimes.com (Global: 7th place; Romanian: 24th place)

pnas.org (Global: 1,411th place; Romanian: 1,038th place)

stanford.edu (Global: 194th place; Romanian: 60th place)

plato.stanford.edu

thedailybeast.com (Global: 517th place; Romanian: 822nd place)

timesofisrael.com (Global: 268th place; Romanian: 610th place)

ucla.edu (Global: 885th place; Romanian: 892nd place)

cogweb.ucla.edu

ugent.be (Global: 3,681st place; Romanian: 2,024th place)

biblio.ugent.be

washingtonpost.com (Global: 35th place; Romanian: 112th place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; Romanian: 1st place)

worldcat.org (Global: 4th place; Romanian: 9th place)

aaas.org (Global: 6,319^th place; Romanian: 3,985^th place)

abc.net.au (Global: 120^th place; Romanian: 397^th place)

achievement.org (Global: 3,458^th place; Romanian: 4,405^th place)

adsabs.harvard.edu (Global: 14^th place; Romanian: 29^th place)

archive.org (Global: 6^th place; Romanian: 19^th place)

archive.today (Global: 28^th place; Romanian: 82^nd place)

berkeley.edu (Global: 621^st place; Romanian: 552^nd place)

books.google.com (Global: 3^rd place; Romanian: 8^th place)

britannica.com (Global: 37^th place; Romanian: 27^th place)

canada.com (Global: 1,459^th place; Romanian: 2,280^th place)

catholicnewsagency.com (Global: 2,558^th place; Romanian: 2,571^st place)

chronicle.com (Global: 3,373^rd place; Romanian: 4,518^th place)

dickinson.edu (Global: low place; Romanian: 8,517^th place)

doi.org (Global: 2^nd place; Romanian: 3^rd place)

findlaw.com (Global: 2,070^th place; Romanian: 4,729^th place)

hdl.handle.net (Global: 66^th place; Romanian: 249^th place)

loc.gov (Global: 63^rd place; Romanian: 36^th place)

nih.gov (Global: 5^th place; Romanian: 6^th place)

nwsource.com (Global: 1,828^th place; Romanian: 1,889^th place)

nytimes.com (Global: 7^th place; Romanian: 24^th place)

pnas.org (Global: 1,411^th place; Romanian: 1,038^th place)

stanford.edu (Global: 194^th place; Romanian: 60^th place)

thedailybeast.com (Global: 517^th place; Romanian: 822^nd place)

timesofisrael.com (Global: 268^th place; Romanian: 610^th place)

ucla.edu (Global: 885^th place; Romanian: 892^nd place)

ugent.be (Global: 3,681^st place; Romanian: 2,024^th place)

washingtonpost.com (Global: 35^th place; Romanian: 112^th place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; Romanian: 1^st place)

worldcat.org (Global: 4^th place; Romanian: 9^th place)