References analysis of the Wikipedia article "Evanghelia după Matei" in the Romanian version

archive.org

„Full text of "Historical Jesus by Bart D. Ehrman"”. Internet Archive. 2000. Accesat în 22 octombrie 2020. Papias tells us that Matthew’s book comprised only “sayings” of Jesus (our Matthew contains a lot more than that) and it was written in Hebrew (not Greek, as our version came down to us). Papias does not appear, therefore, to be referring to this book.

Ehrman, Bart D. (2009). Jesus, Interrupted: Revealing the Hidden Contradictions in the Bible (And Why We Don't Know About Them). HarperCollins, United States. p. 89. ISBN 978-0-06-117393-6. I have often wondered what would have happened if Paul and Matthew had been locked up in a room together and told they could not come out until they had hammered out a consensus statement on how followers of Jesus were to deal with the Jewish law. Would they ever have emerged, or would they still be there, two skeletons locked in a death grip?

books.google.com

Millard, Alan (2006). „Authors, Books, and Readers in the Ancient World”. În Rogerson, J.W.; Lieu, Judith M. The Oxford Handbook of Biblical Studies. Oxford University Press. p. 558. ISBN 978-0199254255. The historical narratives, the Gospels and Acts, are anonymous, the attributions to Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John being first reported in the mid-second century by Irenaeus

Reddish 2011, pp. 13,42. Reddish, Mitchell (2011). An Introduction to The Gospels. Abingdon Press. ISBN 978-1426750083.

Cousland 2018, p. 1380. Cousland, J.R.C. (1 martie 2018). Coogan, Michael David; Brettler, Marc Zvi; Newsom, Carol Ann; Perkins, Pheme, ed. The New Oxford Annotated Bible: New Revised Standard Version. Oxford University Press. p. 1380. ISBN 978-0-19-027605-8.

Burkett 2002, p. 174. Burkett, Delbert (2002). An introduction to the New Testament and the origins of Christianity. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-00720-7.

Duling 2010, pp. 301–02. Duling, Dennis C. (2010). „The Gospel of Matthew”. În Aune, David E. The Blackwell Companion to the New Testament. Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-1-4051-0825-6.

Sanders, E. P. (30 noiembrie 1995). The Historical Figure of Jesus. Penguin Books Limited. p. 103. ISBN 978-0-14-192822-7. We do not know who wrote the gospels. They presently have headings: ‘according to Matthew’, ‘according to Mark’, ‘according to Luke’ and ‘according to John’. The Matthew and John who are meant were two of the original disciples of Jesus. Mark was a follower of Paul, and possibly also of Peter; Luke was one of Paul's converts.⁵ These men – Matthew, Mark, Luke and John – really lived, but we do not know that they wrote gospels. Present evidence indicates that the gospels remained untitled until the second half of the second century.

Ehrman, Bart D. (2000). The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings. Oxford University Press. p. 49. ISBN 978-0-19-512639-6.

Fullerton Nickle, Keith (1 ianuarie 2001). The Synoptic Gospels: An Introduction. Westminster John Knox Press. p. 43. ISBN 978-0-664-22349-6.

Witherington, Ben (2 iunie 2004). The Gospel Code: Novel Claims About Jesus, Mary Magdalene and Da Vinci. InterVarsity Press. p. 44. ISBN 978-0-8308-3267-5.

Wansbrough, Henry (22 aprilie 2010). Muddiman, John; Barton, John, ed. The Gospels. Oxford University Press. p. 243. ISBN 978-0-19-958025-5. Finally it is important to realize that none of the four gospels originally included an attribution to an author. All were anonymous, and it is only from the fragmentary and enigmatic and—according to Eusebius, from whom we derive the quotation—unreliable evidence of Papias in 120/130 CE that we can begin to piece together any external evidence about the names of their authors and their compilers. This evidence is so difficult to interpret that most modern scholars form their opinions from the content of the gospels themselves, and only then appeal selectively to the external evidence for confirmation of their findings.

Ehrman, Bart D. (1999). Jesus: Apocalyptic Prophet of the New Millennium. Oxford University Press. p. 42. ISBN 978-0-19-512474-3. But are these traditional ascriptions correct? The first thing to observe is that the titles of the Gospels were not put there by their authors—as should be clear after just a moment's reflection. Suppose a disciple named Matthew actually did write a book about Jesus' words and deeds. Would he have called it "The Gospel According to Matthew"? Of course not. He might have called it "The Gospel of Jesus Christ" or "The Life and Death of Our Savior" or something similar. But if someone calls it the Gospel according to Matthew, then it's obviously someone else trying to explain, at the outset, whose version of the story this one is. And in fact we know that the original manuscripts of the Gospels did not have their authors' names attached to them.¹ 1. Because our surviving Greek manuscripts provide such a wide variety of (different) titles for the Gospels, textual scholars have long realized that their familiar names (e.g., "The Gospel according to Matthew") do not go back to a single "original" title, but were later added by scribes.

Ehrman, Bart D. (2005). Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew. Oxford University Press. p. 235. ISBN 978-0-19-518249-1.

Ehrman, Bart D. (1 noiembrie 2004). Truth and Fiction in The Da Vinci Code : A Historian Reveals What We Really Know about Jesus, Mary Magdalene, and Constantine. Oxford University Press, USA. p. 110. ISBN 978-0-19-534616-9.

Ehrman, Bart D. (1 septembrie 2006). The Lost Gospel of Judas Iscariot : A New Look at Betrayer and Betrayed: A New Look at Betrayer and Betrayed. Oxford University Press, USA. p. 143. ISBN 978-0-19-971104-8.

Reddish, Mitchell (2011). An Introduction to The Gospels. Abingdon Press. p. 13, 42. ISBN 978-1426750083.

Michaels, J. Ramsey (2003). „Matthew, Gospel of”. În Mills, Watson E.; Wilson, Richard F.; Bullard, Roger Aubrey. Mercer Commentary on the New Testament. Mercer University Press. p. 942. ISBN 978-0-86554-864-0.

Ehrman, Bart D. (23 septembrie 1999). Jesus: Apocalyptic Prophet of the New Millennium. Oxford University Press. p. 44. ISBN 978-0-19-983943-8.

Ehrman, Bart D. (2004). The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings. Oxford University Press. p. 92. ISBN 978-0-19-515462-7.

Levine, Amy-Jill (2001). Coogan, Michael David, ed. The Oxford History of the Biblical World. Oxford University Press. pp. 372–373. ISBN 978-0-19-513937-2.

Ehrman, Bart D. (1 noiembrie 2004). Truth and Fiction in The Da Vinci Code: A Historian Reveals What We Really Know about Jesus, Mary Magdalene, and Constantine. Oxford University Press, USA. p. 111. ISBN 978-0-19-534616-9.

Bromiley, Geoffrey W. (13 februarie 1995). „MATTHEW, GOSPEL ACCORDING TO.”. International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, Volume III: K-P. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. p. 281. ISBN 978-0-8028-3783-7. Almost all scholars agree that our Gospel of Matthew was originally written in Greek and is not a translated document. Matthew's Greek reveals none of the telltale marks of a translation. Furthermore, Matthew's OT quotations are derived from the LXX rather than the Hebrew text (see below), although of course they could be derived from a different Hebrew text or could later have been made to conform to the LXX text.^{[nefuncțională]}

Walvoord, John F. (1 august 1998). Matthew, Thy Kingdom Come: A Commentary on the First Gospel. Kregel Publications. p. 10. ISBN 978-0-8254-3969-8.

Duling 2010, p. 302. Duling, Dennis C. (2010). „The Gospel of Matthew”. În Aune, David E. The Blackwell Companion to the New Testament. Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-1-4051-0825-6.

Porter, Stanley E. (2006). „Language and Translation of the New Testament”. În Rogerson, J.W.; Lieu, Judith M. The Oxford Handbook of Biblical Studies. Oxford University Press. p. 185. ISBN 978-0199254255. the New Testament was, apart from a few individual words (e.g. Mark 5:41, 7: 34, 15: 34//Matt. 27: 46), written virtually entirely in a form of ancient Greek. This much has long been recognized by scholars and others alike.

Rist, John M. (22 august 2005). On the Independence of Matthew and Mark. Cambridge University Press. p. 44. ISBN 978-0-521-01872-2.

Hiebert, D. Edmond (30 septembrie 2002). An Introduction to the New Testament, Volume 1: The Gospels and Acts. Wipf and Stock Publishers. pp. 54–56. ISBN 978-1-59244-062-7.

Harrington, Daniel J. (1991). The Gospel of Matthew. Liturgical Press. pp. 4–5. ISBN 978-0-8146-5803-1.

Aland & Aland 1995, p. 52. Aland, Kurt; Aland, Barbara (1995), The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism, Wm B Eerdmans, ISBN 9780802840981

Harris, Stephen L. (20 ianuarie 2010). Understanding The Bible. McGraw-Hill Education. pp. 347–366. ISBN 978-0-07-340744-9.

Stanton, Graham (1989). The Gospels and Jesus. Oxford University Press. p. 59. ISBN 978-0-19-213241-3.

Cross, Frank Leslie; Livingstone, Elizabeth A., ed. (2005) [1983]. „Matthew, Gospel acc. to St.”. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church (ed. Third revised). Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-280290-3.

Morris, Leon (1992). The Gospel According to Matthew. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. p. 7. ISBN 978-0-85111-338-8.

Keener, Craig S. (24 iulie 2009). The Gospel of Matthew: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. p. 37. ISBN 978-0-8028-6498-7.

Lewis, Jack P. (1992). Freedman, David Noel; Herion, Gary A., ed. The Anchor Bible Dictionary: H-J. Doubleday. pp. 634–637. ISBN 978-0-385-19361-0. The concept of the Council of Jamnia is an hypothesis to explain the canonization of the Writings (the third division of the Hebrew Bible) resulting in the closing of the Hebrew canon. ... These ongoing debates suggest the paucity of evidence on which the hypothesis of the Council of Jamnia rests and raise the question whether it has not served its usefulness and should be relegated to the limbo of unestablished hypotheses. It should not be allowed to be considered a consensus established by mere repetition of assertion.

Dempster, Stephen G. (1 octombrie 2008). Evans, Craig A.; Tov, Emanuel, ed. Exploring the Origins of the Bible (Acadia Studies in Bible and Theology): Canon Formation in Historical, Literary, and Theological Perspective. Baker Academic. p. 52. ISBN 978-1-58558-814-5.

France 2007, p. 18. France, R.T (2007). The Gospel of Matthew. Eerdmans. ISBN 978-0-8028-2501-8.

Senior, Donald (1 decembrie 2011). The Gospel of Matthew: Interpreting Biblical Texts Series. Abingdon Press. p. 82. ISBN 978-1-4267-5003-8.

Duling 2010, pp. 298–99. Duling, Dennis C. (2010). „The Gospel of Matthew”. În Aune, David E. The Blackwell Companion to the New Testament. Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-1-4051-0825-6.

France 2007, p. 19. France, R.T (2007). The Gospel of Matthew. Eerdmans. ISBN 978-0-8028-2501-8.

Davies & Allison 1988, p. 128. Davies, William David; Allison, Dale C. (1988). A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to Saint Matthew. I: Introduction and Commentary on Matthew I–VII. T&T Clark Ltd. ISBN 978-0-567-09481-0.

worldcat.org

Constantinescu, Ioan (2002). Studiul Noului Testament : manual pentru seminariile teologice. Editura Institutului Biblic și de Misiune Ortodoxă al Bisericii Ortodoxe Române. p. 48. ISBN 973-9332-75-7. OCLC 895107171.

Anania, Valeriu; Arăpașu, Teoctist (2001). „Introducere la Evanghelia după Matei”. Biblia sau Sfânta Scriptură : ediție jubiliară a Sfântului Sinod. Institutul Biblic și de Misiune Ortodoxă. p. 1459. ISBN 973-9332-86-2. OCLC 1128894421.

Tenney, Merrill C (1960) [1953]. The New Testament : an historical and analytic survey. Eerdmans. OCLC 926287050. tradus în românește drept Tenney, Merrill Chapin; Percy, Livius; Dunnett, Walter M. (2008). Studiu al Noului Testament. Cartea Creștină. ISBN 978-973-9317-98-6. OCLC 895289111. Ediția românească din 1986 pp. 127-128.

Braniște, Ene; Braniște, Ecaterina (2001). Dicționar enciclopedic de cunoștințe religioase. Editura Diecezană. ISBN 973-97569-7-2. OCLC 895640523.

Brown 1997, pp. 210-211. Brown, Raymond E. (1997). An introduction to the New Testament. New York: Doubleday. ISBN 0-385-24767-2. OCLC 35990175.

Kee, Howard Clark (1997). The Cambridge companion to the Bible. Cambridge University Press. p. 448. ISBN 0-521-34369-0. OCLC 035650754.

Pentru o trecere în revistă a dezbaterii vezi: Foster, Paul (2003). „Why Did Matthew Get the Shema Wrong? A Study of Matt 22:37”. Journal of Biblical Literature. 122 (2): 309–333. doi:10.2307/i364635. ISSN 0021-9231.

Brown, Raymond E. (1997). An introduction to the New Testament. Doubleday. pp. 158ff. ISBN 0-385-24767-2. OCLC 35990175.

Hiebert, D. Edmond (1981). An introduction to the New Testament. BMH Books. ISBN 0-88469-204-3. OCLC 27000511.

Lewis, Jack P. (2001). „Jamnia Revisited”. În McDonald, Lee Martin; Sanders, James A. The Canon Debate. Baker Academic. ISBN 978-1-4412-4163-4. OCLC 1153986016.

Evanghelia după Matei (Romanian Wikipedia)

academia.edu

archive.org

bookreviews.org

books.google.com

doi.org

google.nl

books.google.nl

proquest.com

public.ebookcentral.proquest.com

web.archive.org

worldcat.org