Filosofia germană (Romanian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Filosofia germană" in Romanian language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Romanian rank
43rd place
2nd place
1st place
1st place
low place
7,218th place
9,697th place
low place
low place
low place
179th place
36th place

friesian.com

  • „Foundationalism and Hermeneutics”. www.friesian.com. Accesat în . 

mac.edu

stanford.edu

plato.stanford.edu

stonybrook.edu

web.archive.org

wikidata.org

  • Rutherford (1998) is a detailed scholarly study of Leibniz's Theodicy⁠(d).
  • Frederick C. Beiser⁠(d), German Idealism: The Struggle Against Subjectivism, 1781-1801, Harvard University Press, 2002, part I.
  • Frederick C. Beiser⁠(d), German Idealism: The Struggle Against Subjectivism, 1781-1801, Harvard University Press, 2002, p. viii: "the young romantics—Hölderlin, Schlegel, Novalis—[were] crucial figures in the development of German idealism."
  • Bertrand Russell, A History of Western Philosophy⁠(d).
  • Frederick C. Beiser⁠(d) (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hegel, Cambridge University Press, 1993, p. 339 n. 58.
  • The World as Will and Representation⁠(d), Vol. 2, Ch. 48 (Dover page 616), "The ascetic tendency is certainly unmistakable in genuine and original Christianity, as it was developed in the writings of the Church Fathers from the kernel of the New Testament; this tendency is the highest point to which everything strives upwards."
  • Beiser⁠(d) reviews the commonly held position that Schopenhauer was a transcendental idealist and he rejects it: "Though it is deeply heretical from the standpoint of transcendental idealism, Schopenhauer's objective standpoint involves a form of transcendental realism, i.e. the assumption of the independent reality of the world of experience." (Beiser, Frederick C., Weltschmerz: Pessimism in German Philosophy, 1860–1900, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, p. 40).
  • Beiser, Frederick C.⁠(d), Weltschmerz: Pessimism in German Philosophy, 1860–1900, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, p. 213 n. 30.