The IPCC report is based on a non-peer reviewed work by the World Wildlife Federation. They, in turn, drew their information from an interview conducted by New Scientist with Dr. Hasnain, an Indian glaciologist, who admitted that the view was speculative. See: and Arhivat în , la Wayback Machine. On the IPCC statement withdrawing the finding, see: Arhivat în , la Wayback Machine.
The IPCC report is based on a non-peer reviewed work by the World Wildlife Federation. They, in turn, drew their information from an interview conducted by New Scientist with Dr. Hasnain, an Indian glaciologist, who admitted that the view was speculative. See: and Arhivat în , la Wayback Machine. On the IPCC statement withdrawing the finding, see: Arhivat în , la Wayback Machine.
Reputația de lungă durată a Gangelui ca un fluviu purificator pare să aibă o bază în domeniul științei. Mai întâi de toate, fluviul poartă bacteriofagi care distrug bacteriile. Cum s-a raportat într-un program național la Radioul Public, dizenteria și holera sunt distruse, prevenind epidemii pe scară largă. Fluviul are o capacitate neobișnuită de a reține oxigen dizolvat, dar motivul pentru care are această capacitate nu este cunoscut.<ref>Self-purification effect of bacteriophage, oxygen retention mystery: Mystery Factor Gives Ganges a Clean Reputation by Julian Crandall Hollick. National Public Radio.
The IPCC report is based on a non-peer reviewed work by the World Wildlife Federation. They, in turn, drew their information from an interview conducted by New Scientist with Dr. Hasnain, an Indian glaciologist, who admitted that the view was speculative. See: and Arhivat în , la Wayback Machine. On the IPCC statement withdrawing the finding, see: Arhivat în , la Wayback Machine.
The IPCC report is based on a non-peer reviewed work by the World Wildlife Federation. They, in turn, drew their information from an interview conducted by New Scientist with Dr. Hasnain, an Indian glaciologist, who admitted that the view was speculative. See: and Arhivat în , la Wayback Machine. On the IPCC statement withdrawing the finding, see: Arhivat în , la Wayback Machine.
