Homeopatie (Romanian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Homeopatie" in Romanian language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Romanian rank
4th place
4th place
2nd place
3rd place
1st place
1st place
5th place
11th place
8th place
14th place
3rd place
6th place
30th place
92nd place
1,031st place
6,454th place
3,734th place
18th place
928th place
2,656th place
1,485th place
1,244th place
36th place
126th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
121st place
129th place
low place
8,283rd place
low place
low place
18th place
27th place
234th place
260th place
low place
low place
613th place
946th place
3,413th place
2,945th place
3,828th place
4,114th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
3,680th place
1,275th place
9,356th place
low place
278th place
1,942nd place
low place
low place
1,226th place
1,215th place
2,814th place
866th place
low place
low place
low place
8,461st place
low place
low place
12th place
74th place
219th place
196th place

academia.edu

archives-ouvertes.fr

hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr

  • Naudet, Florian; Falissard, Bruno; Boussageon, Rémy; Healy, David (). „Has evidence-based medicine left quackery behind?” (PDF). Internal and Emergency Medicine. 10 (5): 631–634. doi:10.1007/s11739-015-1227-3. ISSN 1970-9366. PMID 25828467. Treatments such as relaxation techniques, chiropractic, therapeutic massage, special diets, megavitamins, acupuncture, naturopathy, homeopathy, hypnosis and psychoanalysis are often considered as ‘‘pseudoscience’’ or ‘‘quackery’’ with no credible or respectable place in medicine, because in evaluation they have not been shown to ‘‘work’’ 

bbc.co.uk

news.bbc.co.uk

  • „Homoeopathy's benefit questioned”. BBC News. . Accesat în . Professor Egger said: "We acknowledge to prove a negative is impossible. But good large studies of homeopathy do not show a difference between the placebo and the homoeopathic remedy, whereas in the case of conventional medicines you still see an effect." 
  • „Scientists attack homeopathy move”. BBC News. . Accesat în . In a statement, the Royal College of Pathologists said they were "deeply alarmed" that the regulation of medicine had "moved away from science and clear information for the public" 

bbc.co.uk

bmj.com

jme.bmj.com

books.google.com

  • Mahner, Martin (). Pigliucci, Massimo; Boudry, Maarten, ed. Philosophy of pseudoscience reconsidering the demarcation problem (ed. Online-Ausg.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 30–31. ISBN 9780226051826. Accesat în . Despite the lack of generally accepted demarcation criteria, we find remarkable agreement among virtually all philosophers and scientists that fields like astrology, creationism, homeopathy, dowsing, psychokinesis, faith healing, clairvoyance, or ufology are either pseudosciences or at least lack the epistemic warrant to be taken seriously. 
  • Kayne, SB; Caldwell, IM (). Homeopathic pharmacy: theory and practice (ed. 2nd.). Elsevier Health Sciences. p. 52. ISBN 978-0-443-10160-1. 

brauer.com.au

cancer.org

  • „What is Homeopathy”. American Cancer Society. . Arhivat din original la . Accesat în . Most scientists say homeopathic remedies are basically water and can act only as placebos. 

cell.com

creighton.edu

altmed.creighton.edu

dailymail.co.uk

dcscience.net

doi.org

harvard.edu

adsabs.harvard.edu

  • Davenas, E.; Beauvais, F.; Amara, J.; Oberbaum, M.; Robinzon, B.; Miadonnai, A.; Tedeschi, A.; Pomeranz, B.; Fortner, P.; Belon, P.; Sainte-Laudy, J.; Poitevin, B.; Benveniste, J. (). „Human basophil degranulation triggered by very dilute antiserum against IgE”. Nature. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. 333 (6176): 816–818. Bibcode:1988Natur.333..816D. doi:10.1038/333816a0. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 2455231. 

homeopathie-en-gezondheid.be

homeopatie.org

hotnews.ro

improbable.com

independent.co.uk

mainichi.jp

mdn.mainichi.jp

mja.com.au

nature.com

ncahf.org

nhmrc.gov.au

nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

nccih.nih.gov

  • „Questions and Answers About Homeopathy”. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. aprilie 2003. Accesat în . In sum, systematic reviews have not found homeopathy to be a definitively proven treatment for any medical condition. 
  • „Questions and Answers About Homeopathy”. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. aprilie 2003. Accesat în . a number of its key concepts do not follow the laws of science (particularly chemistry and physics) 

nsf.gov

obesitypanacea.com

ox.ac.uk

jr2.ox.ac.uk

  • „Homeopathy: systematic review of systematic reviews”. Bandolier. Arhivat din original la . Accesat în . None of these systematic reviews provided any convincing evidence that homeopathy was effective for any condition. The lesson was often that the best designed trials had the most negative result 

quackwatch.org

senseaboutscience.org.uk

  • Tyler, Chris (septembrie 2006). „Sense About Homeopathy” (PDF). Sense About Science. Arhivat din original (PDF) la . Accesat în . The scientific evidence shows that homeopathy acts only as a placebo and there is no scientific explanation of how it could work any other way. 

sfu.ca

spaceandmotion.com

swissinfo.ch

telegraph.co.uk

theconversation.com

theguardian.com

web.archive.org

wikipedia.org

en.wikipedia.org

worldcat.org

  • Naudet, Florian; Falissard, Bruno; Boussageon, Rémy; Healy, David (). „Has evidence-based medicine left quackery behind?” (PDF). Internal and Emergency Medicine. 10 (5): 631–634. doi:10.1007/s11739-015-1227-3. ISSN 1970-9366. PMID 25828467. Treatments such as relaxation techniques, chiropractic, therapeutic massage, special diets, megavitamins, acupuncture, naturopathy, homeopathy, hypnosis and psychoanalysis are often considered as ‘‘pseudoscience’’ or ‘‘quackery’’ with no credible or respectable place in medicine, because in evaluation they have not been shown to ‘‘work’’ 
  • Bewley, Susan; Ross, Nick; Braillon, Alain; Ernst, Edzard; Garrow, John; Rose, Les; Brahams, Diana; Baum, Michael; Marks, Vincent; Isaacs, Keith; May, James (). „Clothing naked quackery and legitimising pseudoscience”. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.). 343: d5960. doi:10.1136/bmj.d5960. ISSN 1756-1833. PMID 21937550. 
  • Davenas, E.; Beauvais, F.; Amara, J.; Oberbaum, M.; Robinzon, B.; Miadonnai, A.; Tedeschi, A.; Pomeranz, B.; Fortner, P.; Belon, P.; Sainte-Laudy, J.; Poitevin, B.; Benveniste, J. (). „Human basophil degranulation triggered by very dilute antiserum against IgE”. Nature. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. 333 (6176): 816–818. Bibcode:1988Natur.333..816D. doi:10.1038/333816a0. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 2455231. 
  • Guggisberg, Adrian G.; Baumgartner, Stephan M.; Tschopp, Cornelia M.; Heusser, Peter (). „Replication study concerning the effects of homeopathic dilutions of histamine on human basophil degranulation in vitro”. Complementary Therapies in Medicine. Elsevier BV. 13 (2): 91–100. doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2005.04.003. ISSN 0965-2299. PMID 16036166. 
  • SMITH, KEVIN (). „Against Homeopathy - A Utilitarian Perspective” (PDF). Bioethics. Wiley. 26 (8): 398–409. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01876.x. ISSN 0269-9702. PMID 21320146. 
  • Kaliszan, Roman; Waszczuk‐Jankowska, Małgorzata; Siluk, Danuta; Wielgomas, Bartosz (). „"Molecularly imprinted chromatography" fails to distinguish homeopathic remedy from placebo”. Journal of Separation Science. 40 (20): 3976–3976. doi:10.1002/jssc.201700861. ISSN 1615-9306. 

worldofhomeopathy.com