Sign In

Login

Password

Forgot Password ? Sign Up

Homo rhodesiensis (Romanian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Homo rhodesiensis" in Romanian language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Romanian rank
3books.google.com
3rd place
6th place
2doi.org
2nd place
3rd place
2nih.gov
4th place
4th place
1gbif.org
1,611th place
2,332nd place
1plos.org
2,112th place
3,427th place
1web.archive.org
1st place
1st place
1daily-mail.co.zm
low place
low place

books.google.com

daily-mail.co.zm

doi.org

  • Mounier, Aurélien; Condemi, Silvana; Manzi, Giorgio (). „The Stem Species of Our Species: A Place for the Archaic Human Cranium from Ceprano, Italy”. PLoS ONE. PLOS ONE. 6 (4): e18821. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018821. PMC 3080388 Accesibil gratuit. PMID 21533096. Accesat în .  "Ceprano clusters in our analysis with other European, African and Asian Mid-Pleistocene specimens – such as Petralona, Dali, Kabwe, Jinniu Shan, Steinheim, and SH5 – furnishing a rather plesiomorphic phenetic link among them. On the basis of this morphological affinity, it seems appropriate to group Ceprano with these fossils, and consider them as a single taxon. The available nomen for this putative species is H. heidelbergensis, whose distinctiveness stands on the retention of a number of archaic traits combined with features that are more derived and independent from any Neandertal ancestry. [...] This result would suggest that H. ergaster survived as a distinct species until 1 Ma, and would discard the validity of the species H. cepranensis [...] Thus we can include the so-called “Ante-Neandertals” from Europe in the same taxonomical unit with other Mid-Pleistocene samples from Africa and continental Asia. Combining the results of the two approaches of our phenetic analysis, Ceprano should be reasonably accommodated as part of a Mid-Pleistocene human taxon H. heidelbergensis, which would include European, African, and Asian specimens. Moreover, the combination of archaic and derived features exhibited by the Italian specimen represents a “node” connecting the different poles of such a polymorphic humanity."
  • White, Tim D.; Asfaw, B.; DeGusta, D.; Gilbert, H.; Richards, G. D.; Suwa, G.; Howell, F. C. (). „Pleistocene Homo sapiens from Middle Awash, Ethiopia”. Nature. 423 (6491): 742–747. doi:10.1038/nature01669. PMID 12802332. 

gbif.org

  • „GBIF 787018738 Fossil of Homo rhodesiensis Woodward, 1921”. GBIF org. Accesat în . 

nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

  • Mounier, Aurélien; Condemi, Silvana; Manzi, Giorgio (). „The Stem Species of Our Species: A Place for the Archaic Human Cranium from Ceprano, Italy”. PLoS ONE. PLOS ONE. 6 (4): e18821. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018821. PMC 3080388 Accesibil gratuit. PMID 21533096. Accesat în .  "Ceprano clusters in our analysis with other European, African and Asian Mid-Pleistocene specimens – such as Petralona, Dali, Kabwe, Jinniu Shan, Steinheim, and SH5 – furnishing a rather plesiomorphic phenetic link among them. On the basis of this morphological affinity, it seems appropriate to group Ceprano with these fossils, and consider them as a single taxon. The available nomen for this putative species is H. heidelbergensis, whose distinctiveness stands on the retention of a number of archaic traits combined with features that are more derived and independent from any Neandertal ancestry. [...] This result would suggest that H. ergaster survived as a distinct species until 1 Ma, and would discard the validity of the species H. cepranensis [...] Thus we can include the so-called “Ante-Neandertals” from Europe in the same taxonomical unit with other Mid-Pleistocene samples from Africa and continental Asia. Combining the results of the two approaches of our phenetic analysis, Ceprano should be reasonably accommodated as part of a Mid-Pleistocene human taxon H. heidelbergensis, which would include European, African, and Asian specimens. Moreover, the combination of archaic and derived features exhibited by the Italian specimen represents a “node” connecting the different poles of such a polymorphic humanity."
  • White, Tim D.; Asfaw, B.; DeGusta, D.; Gilbert, H.; Richards, G. D.; Suwa, G.; Howell, F. C. (). „Pleistocene Homo sapiens from Middle Awash, Ethiopia”. Nature. 423 (6491): 742–747. doi:10.1038/nature01669. PMID 12802332. 

plos.org

journals.plos.org

  • Mounier, Aurélien; Condemi, Silvana; Manzi, Giorgio (). „The Stem Species of Our Species: A Place for the Archaic Human Cranium from Ceprano, Italy”. PLoS ONE. PLOS ONE. 6 (4): e18821. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018821. PMC 3080388 Accesibil gratuit. PMID 21533096. Accesat în .  "Ceprano clusters in our analysis with other European, African and Asian Mid-Pleistocene specimens – such as Petralona, Dali, Kabwe, Jinniu Shan, Steinheim, and SH5 – furnishing a rather plesiomorphic phenetic link among them. On the basis of this morphological affinity, it seems appropriate to group Ceprano with these fossils, and consider them as a single taxon. The available nomen for this putative species is H. heidelbergensis, whose distinctiveness stands on the retention of a number of archaic traits combined with features that are more derived and independent from any Neandertal ancestry. [...] This result would suggest that H. ergaster survived as a distinct species until 1 Ma, and would discard the validity of the species H. cepranensis [...] Thus we can include the so-called “Ante-Neandertals” from Europe in the same taxonomical unit with other Mid-Pleistocene samples from Africa and continental Asia. Combining the results of the two approaches of our phenetic analysis, Ceprano should be reasonably accommodated as part of a Mid-Pleistocene human taxon H. heidelbergensis, which would include European, African, and Asian specimens. Moreover, the combination of archaic and derived features exhibited by the Italian specimen represents a “node” connecting the different poles of such a polymorphic humanity."

web.archive.org