Suflet (Romanian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Suflet" in Romanian language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Romanian rank

12web.archive.org

1^st place

3pbs.org

198^th place

250^th place

3daemonpage.com

low place

3ntu.edu.tw

2,798^th place

low place

2bahai.org

5,220^th place

low place

2drbachinese.org

low place

2vatican.va

281^st place

257^th place

2wikilivres.info

low place

2tufts.edu

155^th place

154^th place

1bartleby.com

1,295^th place

558^th place

1britannica.com

40^th place

16^th place

1nd.edu

2,387^th place

3,000^th place

1etymonline.com

287^th place

191^st place

1peyman.info

low place

1bskk.com

low place

1awker.com

low place

1dharma.com.tw

low place

1buddhism.com.cn

low place

1xiandaiyinguo.cn

low place

1fjnet.com

low place

1catholiceducation.org

low place

9,274^th place

1timesonline.co.uk

241^st place

234^th place

1griffith.edu.au

low place

1biblegateway.com

487^th place

510^th place

1christadelphia.org

low place

1newadvent.org

471^st place

400^th place

1quran.com

1,799^th place

low place

1sina.com.cn

144^th place

8,490^th place

1deathreference.com

low place

1voyagestohell.com

low place

1nytimes.com

7^th place

25^th place

1wikipedia.org

low place

awker.com

„從律典探索佛教對動物的態度（中）”. Arhivat din original la 21 noiembrie 2011. Accesat în 14 septembrie 2010.

bahai.org

reference.bahai.org

Bahá'u'lláh (1976). Gleanings from the Writings of Bahá'u'lláh (Alegeri din Scrierile lui Bahá'u'lláh). Wilmette, Illinois, USA: Bahá'í Publishing Trust. pp. 158–163. ISBN 0-87743-187-6.
Bahá'u'lláh (1976). Gleanings from the Writings of Bahá'u'lláh (Alegeri din Scrierile lui Bahá'u'lláh). Wilmette, Illinois, USA: Bahá'í Publishing Trust. pp. 155–158. ISBN 0-87743-187-6.

bartleby.com

"Suflet", The Columbia Encyclopedia (Enciclopedia Columbia), A șasea ediție. 2001-07. Recuperată Noiembrie 12, 2008.

biblegateway.com

2 corinthians 5:17; NIV - Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, the - Bible Gateway

britannica.com

"Soul", Enciclopedia Britanică. 2008. Recuperată Noiembrie 12, 2008.

bskk.com

植物、草木、山石是无情众生吗？有佛性吗？

buddhism.com.cn

„无情有佛性”. Arhivat din original la 18 septembrie 2002. Accesat în 14 septembrie 2010.

catholiceducation.org

„Do Embryos Have Souls? (Au embrionii suflete?), Father Tadeusz Pacholczyk, PhD, Centrul de Resurse Educaționale Catolice”. Arhivat din original la 29 iunie 2011. Accesat în 14 septembrie 2010.

christadelphia.org

Birmingham Amended Statement of Faith. Disponibil online Arhivat în 16 februarie 2014, la Wayback Machine.

daemonpage.com

deathreference.com

Encyclopedia of Death and Dying (Enciclopedia Morților și celor pe moarte) (2008).

dharma.com.tw

„無情眾生現今是不具有神識，但具有佛性！”. Arhivat din original la 30 decembrie 2011. Accesat în 14 septembrie 2010.

drbachinese.org

etymonline.com

Online Etymology Dictionary. (Dicționar Etimologic Online) (2001). "Psihologie".

fjnet.com

big5.fjnet.com

果卿居士《現代因果實錄》的不實之處^{[nefuncțională]}

griffith.edu.au

research-repository.griffith.edu.au

Chamberlain, Susanna, Do women have souls? Feminine identity and the Western project of Self, TASA 2012 Conference.

nd.edu

etd.nd.edu

Nahyan A. G. Fancy (2006), "Pulmonary Transit and Bodily Resurrection: The Interaction of Medicine, Philosophy and Religion in the Works of Ibn al-Nafīs (Tranzitul pulmonar și reînvierea trupului: Interacțiunea medicinei, filozofiei și religiei în lucrările lui Ibn al-Nafīs) (d. 1288)", p. 209-210, Electronic Theses and Dissertations (Teze de doctorat și dizertații electronice), Universitatea din Notre Dame.[1] Arhivat în 4 aprilie 2015, la Wayback Machine.

newadvent.org

Soul at www.newadvent.org

ntu.edu.tw

ccbs.ntu.edu.tw

enlight.lib.ntu.edu.tw

佛教文化系列演講(二) 從提婆達多談起 ──兼論佛教史研究與佛教信仰的衝突現象

nytimes.com

„Found: An Ancient Monument to the Soul (Descoperire: Un antic monument dedicat sufletului)”. The New York Times. Noiembrie 17, 2008. Accesat în 18 noiembrie 2008. Într-un ținut muntos ce astăzi este sudestul Turciei, a trăit în secolul al VIII-lea Î.Hr. un oficial regal, Kuttamuwa, ce a supravăzut finalizarea unui monument inscripționat, sau o stelă, ce avea să fie ridicat după moartea sa. Cuvintele învățau pe rude să comemoreze viața și moartea prin ospăț "pentru sufletul meu ce este în această stelă". Verificați datele pentru: |date= (ajutor)

pbs.org

Among the other groups that would have circulated around the priesthood and around the Temple in Jerusalem, was an old group known as the Sadducees. The Sadducees are really also part of this old priestly aristocracy. They're the land holding group ... the descendants of the people who came back from the Babylonian exile. They were the old Jerusalem upper crust. And they were in charge of most of the political life of Jerusalem proper. They dominated the city council of Jerusalem, or what is called the Sanhedrin. But there were other groups as well. The Pharisees were a Johnny-come-lately group that had joined the political ranks of Jerusalem life, probably sometime in the later Hasmonean Period. That is, just before the Romans came on the scene. The Pharisees have a political interest, but they, in some ways, constitute a kind of outside political faction over against the landed aristocracy - the Sadducees. As a result, we see both political tensions and also religious interests between the groups showing up in different ways. One of the classic ways we differentiate the Sadducees from the Pharisees, is on the basis of religious beliefs and practices. The Sadducees are conservative. They only read the Torah, the five books of Moses. They don't read other things among the Scriptures as authoritative. And so as a result, they don't believe in certain ideas. For example, it's typically suggested that they do not believe in resurrection of the dead. Why? Because it's not in the Torah. The Pharisees, on the other hand, are, if anything, the religious liberals ... the progressives of their day. They want to reinterpret the Scriptures. They want to read more texts, all of which are the expression of this vibrant Judaism of the time. And as a result, they're willing to entertain new ideas, new beliefs, such as that of the resurrection of the dead. - Temple Culture, Why the Temple symbolized the nation of Israel and collaboration with Rome?, L. Michael White, Professor of Classics and Director of the Religious Studies Program University of Texas at Austin, http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/religion/portrait/temple.html
What did the Sadducees do then, exactly, we don't really know. Except the Sadducees apparently had a great deal of following among the well-to-do, among the priestly classes, and seem to have been characterized primarily by two things. One, they opposed the Pharisees and two, they denied belief in the resurrection of the dead, a belief that the Pharisees espoused and the Sadducees denied. - Judaism's First Century Diversity, http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/religion/portrait/judaism.html
The Sadducees are usually associated with aristocratic Priests, therefore they're in Jerusalem. They seem to not have thought that there was resurrection of the dead, which by this period is almost a normative belief in Judaism. And, since they were Priests, much of their religious interests focused on the smooth operation of the Temple, as is right, because that was their responsibility. Pharisees, on the other hand, were a school of interpretation of Biblical text... Priests are family groups in Judaism. If you have a friend named Cohen, that means he's a priest. So one is born a priest. One can't choose to become a priest, unlike most other religious groupings in antiquity. But, if somebody is born a priest, he could decide to interpret the Bible according to a Pharisaic tradition, and that's what happened. These are not absolute boundaries. These are permeable identifications. Josephus, for example, this historian we have is from a Jerusalem-like, priestly, aristocratic family, but he aligns himself with the Pharisees, which is one of the reasons why he praises them so much in his books. - Paula Fredriksen: William GoodwinAurelio Professor of the Appreciation of Scripture, Boston University, http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/religion/portrait/judaism.html

peyman.info

Taherzadeh, Adib (1976). The Revelation of Bahá'u'lláh (Revelațiile lui Bahá'u'lláh), Volumul 1. Oxford, UK: George Ronald. ISBN 0-85398-270-8.

quran.com

[2], Quran.com Surat Al-'Isra', Versul 85.

sina.com.cn

blog.sina.com.cn

„灵魂的构成——⑶、三魂、七魄、九灵”. Arhivat din original la 7 iulie 2011. Accesat în 14 septembrie 2010.

timesonline.co.uk

[https://web.archive.org/web/20110918113735/http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article3912708.ece Arhivat în 18 septembrie 2011, la Wayback Machine. Embryos have souls? What nonsense (Embrionii au suflete? Ce absurd), de Matthew Syed, 12 mai 2008, The Times]

tufts.edu

chem.tufts.edu

„Methodological Naturalism vs Ontological or Philosophical Naturalism (Naturalismul Metodologic vs Ontologic sau Naturalism filozofic)”. Arhivat din original la 8 august 2017. Accesat în 14 septembrie 2010.

ase.tufts.edu

Daniel Dennett. „The Self as a Center of Narrative Gravity”. Accesat în 3 iulie 2008.

vatican.va

voyagestohell.com

Voyages to Hell

web.archive.org

Nahyan A. G. Fancy (2006), "Pulmonary Transit and Bodily Resurrection: The Interaction of Medicine, Philosophy and Religion in the Works of Ibn al-Nafīs (Tranzitul pulmonar și reînvierea trupului: Interacțiunea medicinei, filozofiei și religiei în lucrările lui Ibn al-Nafīs) (d. 1288)", p. 209-210, Electronic Theses and Dissertations (Teze de doctorat și dizertații electronice), Universitatea din Notre Dame.[1] Arhivat în 4 aprilie 2015, la Wayback Machine.
„從律典探索佛教對動物的態度（中）”. Arhivat din original la 21 noiembrie 2011. Accesat în 14 septembrie 2010.
„無情眾生現今是不具有神識，但具有佛性！”. Arhivat din original la 30 decembrie 2011. Accesat în 14 septembrie 2010.
„无情有佛性”. Arhivat din original la 18 septembrie 2002. Accesat în 14 septembrie 2010.
„橡皮树的义举”. Arhivat din original la 4 mai 2010. Accesat în 14 septembrie 2010.
„Do Embryos Have Souls? (Au embrionii suflete?), Father Tadeusz Pacholczyk, PhD, Centrul de Resurse Educaționale Catolice”. Arhivat din original la 29 iunie 2011. Accesat în 14 septembrie 2010.
Birmingham Amended Statement of Faith. Disponibil online Arhivat în 16 februarie 2014, la Wayback Machine.
„The Holy Qur'an (Sfântul Coran)~ 66. At-Tahrim (Banning)”. Arhivat din original la 12 septembrie 2010. Accesat în 14 septembrie 2010.
„The Holy Qur'an ~ 39. Az-Zumar (The Troops, Throngs)”. Arhivat din original la 3 iulie 2010. Accesat în 14 septembrie 2010.
„灵魂的构成——⑶、三魂、七魄、九灵”. Arhivat din original la 7 iulie 2011. Accesat în 14 septembrie 2010.
„Methodological Naturalism vs Ontological or Philosophical Naturalism (Naturalismul Metodologic vs Ontologic sau Naturalism filozofic)”. Arhivat din original la 8 august 2017. Accesat în 14 septembrie 2010.
„Explicația biologică a religiei - Wikipedia”. Arhivat din original la 14 iulie 2012. Accesat în 10 septembrie 2012.

wikilivres.info

„The Holy Qur'an (Sfântul Coran)~ 66. At-Tahrim (Banning)”. Arhivat din original la 12 septembrie 2010. Accesat în 14 septembrie 2010.
„The Holy Qur'an ~ 39. Az-Zumar (The Troops, Throngs)”. Arhivat din original la 3 iulie 2010. Accesat în 14 septembrie 2010.

wikipedia.org

ro.wikipedia.org

„Explicația biologică a religiei - Wikipedia”. Arhivat din original la 14 iulie 2012. Accesat în 10 septembrie 2012.

xiandaiyinguo.cn

„橡皮树的义举”. Arhivat din original la 4 mai 2010. Accesat în 14 septembrie 2010.