The tradition is reflected in, and may stem from, a charter in Glastonbury, now considered spurious, in which he is identified as the queen's brother. However, even as a forgery, it has sometimes been valued as at least "some evidence, when not contradicted by anything better", to quote Edward A. Freeman (1872), "King Ine (недоступная ссылка)", Proceedings of the Somersetshire Archaeological and Natural History Society18, pt 2, 1–59, fn p. 15Архивная копия от 18 ноября 2018 на Wayback Machine
The tradition is reflected in, and may stem from, a charter in Glastonbury, now considered spurious, in which he is identified as the queen's brother. However, even as a forgery, it has sometimes been valued as at least "some evidence, when not contradicted by anything better", to quote Edward A. Freeman (1872), "King Ine (недоступная ссылка)", Proceedings of the Somersetshire Archaeological and Natural History Society18, pt 2, 1–59, fn p. 15Архивная копия от 18 ноября 2018 на Wayback Machine
