Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Эфталиты" in Russian language version.
{{cite journal}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= несоответствие временной метки; предлагается 11 ноября 2020 (справка)"The relative abundance of data norwithstanding, we have but a very fragmentary picture of Hephthalite civilization. There is no consensus con- cerning the Hephthalite language, though most scholars seem to think that it was Iranian. The Pei shih at least clearly states that the language of the Hephthalites differs from those of the High Chariots, of the Juan-juan and of the "various Hu a rather vague term which, in this context, probably refers to some Iranian peoples… According to the Liang shu the Hephthalites worshiped Heaven and also fire a clear reference to Zoroastrianism."
"Concerning the Hephthalites, Enoki Kazuo stresses that their place of origin was to the north of the Hindu Kush mountain range and that they were of Iranian stock he rejects the view that they were of Altaic origin, with Turkish connections."
«One cannot go into details here about that dark period of Central Asian history from the time of the Kushans down the coming of the Arabs, but one may suggest that the beginning of this period saw the last waves of Iranian-speaking nomads moving to the south, to be replaced by the Turkic-speaking nomads beginning in the late fourth century… but our information about them, known in Classical and Islamic sources as the Chionites and Hephthalites, is so meager that much confusion has reigned regarding their origins and nature.Just as later nomadic empires were confederations of many peoples, we may tentatively propose that the ruling groups of these were, or at least included, Turkic-speaking tribesmen from the east and north, although most probably the bulk of the people in the confederation of Chionites and then Hephthalites spoke an Iranian language. In this case, as normal, the nomads adopted the written language, institutions, and culture of the settled folk.To call them "Iranian Huns" as Gobl has done is not infelicitous, for surely the bulk of the population ruled by the Chionites and Hephthalites was lranian (Gobl 1967:ix). But this was the last time in the history of Central Asia that Iranian-speaking nomads played any role; hereafter all nomads would speak Turkic languages and the millennium-old division between settled Tajik and nomadic Turk would obtain».
{{cite journal}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= несоответствие временной метки; предлагается 11 ноября 2020 (справка){{cite journal}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= несоответствие временной метки; предлагается 11 ноября 2020 (справка){{cite journal}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= несоответствие временной метки; предлагается 11 января 2021 (справка){{cite journal}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= несоответствие временной метки; предлагается 19 апреля 2022 (справка){{cite journal}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= несоответствие временной метки; предлагается 11 ноября 2020 (справка)