Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "CRISPR" in Russian language version.
The biologists writing in Science support continuing laboratory research with the technique, and few if any scientists believe it is ready for clinical use.
{{cite news}}: Указан более чем один параметр |accessdate= and |access-date= (справка)<...>Well, we were who had sent the article first, but had not much of luck. One editorial office told us they would not send the article to the reviewers. We had sent the article to another journal – and the article was kept too long, maybe on some desk of the editor. So finally we sent it to the third journal and it was published few months later. Meanwhile the scientists from the University of Berkeley had a better luck – they have sent the article later than we and it was accepted and published in 2 weeks. But actually they have sent the article few months later than we.Источник. Дата обращения: 29 января 2022. Архивировано 29 января 2022 года.
{{cite news}}: Указан более чем один параметр |accessdate= and |access-date= (справка)The biologists writing in Science support continuing laboratory research with the technique, and few if any scientists believe it is ready for clinical use.
<...>Well, we were who had sent the article first, but had not much of luck. One editorial office told us they would not send the article to the reviewers. We had sent the article to another journal – and the article was kept too long, maybe on some desk of the editor. So finally we sent it to the third journal and it was published few months later. Meanwhile the scientists from the University of Berkeley had a better luck – they have sent the article later than we and it was accepted and published in 2 weeks. But actually they have sent the article few months later than we.Источник. Дата обращения: 29 января 2022. Архивировано 29 января 2022 года.