Большой сатана (Russian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Большой сатана" in Russian language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Russian rank

17web.archive.org

1^st place

8state.gov

264^th place

347^th place

2gwu.edu

1,353^rd place

1,517^th place

2books.google.com

3^rd place

10^th place

2nytimes.com

7^th place

23^rd place

1foreignpolicy.com

1,116^th place

1,331^st place

1pbs.org

198^th place

517^th place

1bbc.co.uk

8^th place

30^th place

1jpost.com

544^th place

886^th place

bbc.co.uk

news.bbc.co.uk

Staff writer(s) (7 декабря 2009). How Iran's opposition inverts old slogans. BBC. Архивировано 2 января 2010. Дата обращения: 21 мая 2016. One of the big anti-Shah chants ended with the slogan "Death to Shah!"...A main revolutionary cry was: "Estaghlal, Azadi, Jomhuriye Eslami" (Eng: Independence, Freedom, Islamic Republic).

books.google.com

David M. Watry. Diplomacy at the Brink: Eisenhower, Churchill, and Eden in the Cold War. — ISBN 978-0-8071-5719-0.
Carsten Stahn. Jus Post Bellum: Mapping the Normative Foundations / Carsten Stahn, Jennifer S. Easterday, Jens Iverson. — OUP Oxford, 2014-02-13. — P. 468. — «It is not uncommon for status questions to act as a lightning rod for…grievances of the local population…A vivid example is offered by Ayatollah Khomeini's speech of 26 October 1964 (Speech 16) denouncing the extension of diplomatic immunities to American military personnel in Iran.». — ISBN 978-0-19-150938-4.

foreignpolicy.com

Staff writer(s). The Battle for Iran (excerpt) (неопр.). Central Intelligence Agency (c. 1975). — «Complete secrecy about the operation that was known under the cryptonym of TPAJAX has been impossible to enforce...[T]he military coup that overthrew Mosadeq and his National Front cabinet was carried out under CIA direction as an act of U.S. foreign policy, conceived and approved at the highest levels of government.» Дата обращения: 20 мая 2016. Архивировано 27 декабря 2019 года.

gwu.edu

nsarchive.gwu.edu

Wilber, Donald. CIA Clandestine Service History, "Overthrow of Premier Mossadeq of Iran, November 1952-August 1953," March 1954, by Dr. Donald Wilber. (неопр.) (март 1954). — «In early summer of 1953 Carroll was assigned the task of planning military aspects of TPAJAX. Several assumptions first had to be taken into account: A. Operation would be joint operation with SIS.» Дата обращения: 20 мая 2016. Архивировано 19 июля 2017 года.
Wilber, Donald. CIA Clandestine Service History, 'Overthrow of Premier Mossadeq of Iran, November 1952-August 1953,' March 1954, by Dr. Donald Wilber. (неопр.) iv (март 1954). — «An estimate entitled 'Factors Involved in the Overthrow of Mossadeq' was completed on 16 April 1953... In April it was determined that the CIA should conduct the envisioned operation jointly with the British Secret Intelligence Service (SIS). By the end of April, it was decided that CIA and SIS officers would draw up a plan… which would be submitted to CIA and SIS Headquarters, and to the Department of State and the Foreign Office for final approval.» Дата обращения: 20 мая 2016. Архивировано 7 августа 2017 года.

jpost.com

This Week in History: Ayatollah Khomeini returns to Iran - Features (неопр.). The Jerusalem Post. Дата обращения: 5 августа 2022. Архивировано 11 февраля 2021 года.

nytimes.com

Risen, James (16 апреля 2000). SECRETS OF HISTORY: The C.I.A. in Iran -- A special report.; How a Plot Convulsed Iran in '53 (and in '79). The New York Times. Архивировано 2 сентября 2021. Дата обращения: 21 мая 2016.

partners.nytimes.com

Risen, James. Key Events in the 1953 Coup (неопр.). The New York Times (16 апреля 2000). — «Aug. 16, 1953…The shah flees to Baghdad.» Дата обращения: 21 мая 2016. Архивировано 6 сентября 2017 года.

pbs.org

Staff writer(s). Chronology: U.S.–Iran relations 1906-2002 (неопр.). PBS News\Frontline (2014). — «1964... Khomeini is exiled to Turkey for his outspoken denunciation of the shah's Status of Forces bill, which grants U.S. military personnel diplomatic immunity for crimes committed on Iranian soil.» Дата обращения: 21 мая 2016. Архивировано 19 апреля 2021 года.

state.gov

history.state.gov

Berry, Burton Y. Telegram No. 343 The Ambassador in Iraq (Berry) to the Department of State (неопр.). Office of the Historian of the U.S. Department of State (17 августа 1953). — «On the third day Mosadeq by some means had been alerted and had had the time to take successful countermeasures so that when the Colonel arrived at Mosadeq's house he was himself arrested...This morning the Shah left his Caspian Palace in a Beechcraft with a pilot, one Palace official and his Queen and landed in Baghdad at 10:15. He said that he thought that he should not stay here more than a few days, but would then go to Europe and he hoped eventually to America. He added he would be looking for work shortly as he has a large family and very small means outside of Iran. I tried to boost his morale by saying that I hoped that soon he would return to reign over his people for whom he had done so much, but he replied that Mosadeq was absolutely mad and insanely jealous, like a tiger who springs upon any living thing that it sees moving above him. Shah believes Mosadeq thinks he can form a partnership with the [Communist] Tudeh Party and then outwit it, but in so doing Mosadeq will become the Dr. [Edvard] Bene[š] of Iran.» Дата обращения: 21 мая 2016. Архивировано 4 октября 2021 года.
Acheson, Dean. Telegram from The Secretary of State to the Embassy in Iran. (Memo of conversation 1 February 1952 between U.S. Department of State and British representatives regarding the Iranian political situation) (неопр.). Office of the Historian of the United States Department of State (7 февраля 1952). — «Although Mosadeq [will] not likely turn toward Russia it is highly improbable that he will do anything [to] check communism in Iran since his ideas of polit[ical] tolerance, neutrality, and fear of offending [the] USSR w[ou]ld prevent his taking action vs Tudeh regardless [of the] outcome [of] the oil question and request[s for] US financial assistance.» Дата обращения: 20 мая 2016. Архивировано 12 апреля 2021 года.
Henderson, Loy. The Ambassador in Iran (Henderson) to the Department of State, repeated to London (неопр.). Office of the Historian of the United States Department of State (28 июля 1952). — «...I could not but be discouraged at [the] thought that [a] person [Mosadeq] so lacking in stability and clearly dominated by emotions and prejudices sh[ou]ld represent [the] only bulwark left between Iran and communism... at one point I almost decided to abandon our conv[ersation] when he r[e]p[ea]t[e]d again and again in monotone that 'Iran w[ou]ld never, never want UK and US to have any differences over it. Iran w[ou]ld prefer [to] go Communist than cause any trouble between US and UK.'». Дата обращения: 20 мая 2016. Архивировано 13 апреля 2021 года.
Henderson, Loy. The Ambassador in Iran (Henderson) to the Department of State, repeated to London (неопр.). Office of the Historian of the United States Department of State (28 июля 1952). — «At this point Mosadeq began to chant that Iran w[ou]ld prefer to go communist than for US and UN [UK] to have differences of opinion with regard to it. Eventually I was able to tell him that US choice was not merely between US-UK friction and Iran going Communist. I stressed that if serious misunderstandings sh[ou]ld develop in present world situation between US and UK, Iran would go Communist anyway.» Дата обращения: 20 мая 2016. Архивировано 13 апреля 2021 года.
Staff writer(s). FOREIGN RELATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES, 1952–1954. IRAN, 1951–1954: VOLUME X No. 339 Editorial Note regarding Department of State Bulletin 10 August 1953, page 178 (неопр.). Office of the Historian of the United States Department of State (28 июля 1953). — «Secretary Dulles held a press conference on July 28. In response to a reporter's question about the growing strength of the Tudeh Party in Iran, the Secretary replied as follows: 'Recent developments in Iran, especially the growing activity of the illegal Communist party, which appears to be tolerated by the Iranian Government have caused us concern. These developments make it more difficult for the United States to give assistance to Iran so long as its government tolerates this sort of activity.'». Дата обращения: 20 мая 2016. Архивировано 1 августа 2020 года.
Gleason, Sarell. No. 358 Memorandum of Discussion at the 160th Meeting of the National Security Council, Washington, August 27, 1953 (неопр.). Eisenhower Library, Eisenhower papers, Whitman file (17 сентября 1953). — «Secretary [of State John Foster] Dulles commented that while what happened in Iran was spontaneous, he did feel obliged to say that a number of people in Iran had kept their heads and maintained their courage when the situation looked very tough... As a result of what had happened, Secretary Dulles informed the Council, the United States now had a 'second chance' in Iran when all hope of avoiding a Communist Iran appeared to have vanished.» Дата обращения: 20 мая 2016. Архивировано 15 октября 2020 года.
Hughes, Thomas L. 67. Memorandum From the Director of the Bureau of Intelligence and Research (Hughes) to Secretary of State Rusk; SUBJECT: The Significance of the Assassination of Prime Minister Hasan Ali Mansur (неопр.). Johnson Library, National Security File, Robert W. Komer Files, Iran, 1965–March 1966. (28 января 1965). — «There is considerable discontent in Iran because of continued repression of opposition groups, exile of Ayatollah Khomeini, unpopular measures passed by the government such as the recent Status of Forces Bill, and the increase in the cost of basic fuels.» Дата обращения: 21 мая 2016. Архивировано 4 октября 2021 года.
Staff writer(s). Central Intelligence Agency\Directorate of Intelligence\Intelligence Report\Centers of Power in Iran (неопр.). Source: Central Intelligence Agency, OCI Files, Job 79T00832A, Box 9, 46. Secret; No Foreign Dissem. Prepared in the Office of Current Intelligence and coordinated within CIA. (май 1972). — «[P]laying an essentially negative role at present... are the clergy, whose strength lies in the emotions of the Iranian masses and whose opposition to the Shah's government is nearly total...Detailed information on the clergy is not available. There are perhaps 100,000 clergymen ranging from the mullah, the lowest clerical post, to the mojtahed.» Дата обращения: 21 мая 2016. Архивировано 27 марта 2021 года.

web.archive.org

Risen, James (16 апреля 2000). SECRETS OF HISTORY: The C.I.A. in Iran -- A special report.; How a Plot Convulsed Iran in '53 (and in '79). The New York Times. Архивировано 2 сентября 2021. Дата обращения: 21 мая 2016.
Risen, James. Key Events in the 1953 Coup (неопр.). The New York Times (16 апреля 2000). — «Aug. 16, 1953…The shah flees to Baghdad.» Дата обращения: 21 мая 2016. Архивировано 6 сентября 2017 года.
Berry, Burton Y. Telegram No. 343 The Ambassador in Iraq (Berry) to the Department of State (неопр.). Office of the Historian of the U.S. Department of State (17 августа 1953). — «On the third day Mosadeq by some means had been alerted and had had the time to take successful countermeasures so that when the Colonel arrived at Mosadeq's house he was himself arrested...This morning the Shah left his Caspian Palace in a Beechcraft with a pilot, one Palace official and his Queen and landed in Baghdad at 10:15. He said that he thought that he should not stay here more than a few days, but would then go to Europe and he hoped eventually to America. He added he would be looking for work shortly as he has a large family and very small means outside of Iran. I tried to boost his morale by saying that I hoped that soon he would return to reign over his people for whom he had done so much, but he replied that Mosadeq was absolutely mad and insanely jealous, like a tiger who springs upon any living thing that it sees moving above him. Shah believes Mosadeq thinks he can form a partnership with the [Communist] Tudeh Party and then outwit it, but in so doing Mosadeq will become the Dr. [Edvard] Bene[š] of Iran.» Дата обращения: 21 мая 2016. Архивировано 4 октября 2021 года.
Staff writer(s). The Battle for Iran (excerpt) (неопр.). Central Intelligence Agency (c. 1975). — «Complete secrecy about the operation that was known under the cryptonym of TPAJAX has been impossible to enforce...[T]he military coup that overthrew Mosadeq and his National Front cabinet was carried out under CIA direction as an act of U.S. foreign policy, conceived and approved at the highest levels of government.» Дата обращения: 20 мая 2016. Архивировано 27 декабря 2019 года.
Wilber, Donald. CIA Clandestine Service History, "Overthrow of Premier Mossadeq of Iran, November 1952-August 1953," March 1954, by Dr. Donald Wilber. (неопр.) (март 1954). — «In early summer of 1953 Carroll was assigned the task of planning military aspects of TPAJAX. Several assumptions first had to be taken into account: A. Operation would be joint operation with SIS.» Дата обращения: 20 мая 2016. Архивировано 19 июля 2017 года.
Wilber, Donald. CIA Clandestine Service History, 'Overthrow of Premier Mossadeq of Iran, November 1952-August 1953,' March 1954, by Dr. Donald Wilber. (неопр.) iv (март 1954). — «An estimate entitled 'Factors Involved in the Overthrow of Mossadeq' was completed on 16 April 1953... In April it was determined that the CIA should conduct the envisioned operation jointly with the British Secret Intelligence Service (SIS). By the end of April, it was decided that CIA and SIS officers would draw up a plan… which would be submitted to CIA and SIS Headquarters, and to the Department of State and the Foreign Office for final approval.» Дата обращения: 20 мая 2016. Архивировано 7 августа 2017 года.
Acheson, Dean. Telegram from The Secretary of State to the Embassy in Iran. (Memo of conversation 1 February 1952 between U.S. Department of State and British representatives regarding the Iranian political situation) (неопр.). Office of the Historian of the United States Department of State (7 февраля 1952). — «Although Mosadeq [will] not likely turn toward Russia it is highly improbable that he will do anything [to] check communism in Iran since his ideas of polit[ical] tolerance, neutrality, and fear of offending [the] USSR w[ou]ld prevent his taking action vs Tudeh regardless [of the] outcome [of] the oil question and request[s for] US financial assistance.» Дата обращения: 20 мая 2016. Архивировано 12 апреля 2021 года.
Henderson, Loy. The Ambassador in Iran (Henderson) to the Department of State, repeated to London (неопр.). Office of the Historian of the United States Department of State (28 июля 1952). — «...I could not but be discouraged at [the] thought that [a] person [Mosadeq] so lacking in stability and clearly dominated by emotions and prejudices sh[ou]ld represent [the] only bulwark left between Iran and communism... at one point I almost decided to abandon our conv[ersation] when he r[e]p[ea]t[e]d again and again in monotone that 'Iran w[ou]ld never, never want UK and US to have any differences over it. Iran w[ou]ld prefer [to] go Communist than cause any trouble between US and UK.'». Дата обращения: 20 мая 2016. Архивировано 13 апреля 2021 года.
Henderson, Loy. The Ambassador in Iran (Henderson) to the Department of State, repeated to London (неопр.). Office of the Historian of the United States Department of State (28 июля 1952). — «At this point Mosadeq began to chant that Iran w[ou]ld prefer to go communist than for US and UN [UK] to have differences of opinion with regard to it. Eventually I was able to tell him that US choice was not merely between US-UK friction and Iran going Communist. I stressed that if serious misunderstandings sh[ou]ld develop in present world situation between US and UK, Iran would go Communist anyway.» Дата обращения: 20 мая 2016. Архивировано 13 апреля 2021 года.
Staff writer(s). FOREIGN RELATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES, 1952–1954. IRAN, 1951–1954: VOLUME X No. 339 Editorial Note regarding Department of State Bulletin 10 August 1953, page 178 (неопр.). Office of the Historian of the United States Department of State (28 июля 1953). — «Secretary Dulles held a press conference on July 28. In response to a reporter's question about the growing strength of the Tudeh Party in Iran, the Secretary replied as follows: 'Recent developments in Iran, especially the growing activity of the illegal Communist party, which appears to be tolerated by the Iranian Government have caused us concern. These developments make it more difficult for the United States to give assistance to Iran so long as its government tolerates this sort of activity.'». Дата обращения: 20 мая 2016. Архивировано 1 августа 2020 года.
Gleason, Sarell. No. 358 Memorandum of Discussion at the 160th Meeting of the National Security Council, Washington, August 27, 1953 (неопр.). Eisenhower Library, Eisenhower papers, Whitman file (17 сентября 1953). — «Secretary [of State John Foster] Dulles commented that while what happened in Iran was spontaneous, he did feel obliged to say that a number of people in Iran had kept their heads and maintained their courage when the situation looked very tough... As a result of what had happened, Secretary Dulles informed the Council, the United States now had a 'second chance' in Iran when all hope of avoiding a Communist Iran appeared to have vanished.» Дата обращения: 20 мая 2016. Архивировано 15 октября 2020 года.
Hughes, Thomas L. 67. Memorandum From the Director of the Bureau of Intelligence and Research (Hughes) to Secretary of State Rusk; SUBJECT: The Significance of the Assassination of Prime Minister Hasan Ali Mansur (неопр.). Johnson Library, National Security File, Robert W. Komer Files, Iran, 1965–March 1966. (28 января 1965). — «There is considerable discontent in Iran because of continued repression of opposition groups, exile of Ayatollah Khomeini, unpopular measures passed by the government such as the recent Status of Forces Bill, and the increase in the cost of basic fuels.» Дата обращения: 21 мая 2016. Архивировано 4 октября 2021 года.
Staff writer(s). Chronology: U.S.–Iran relations 1906-2002 (неопр.). PBS News\Frontline (2014). — «1964... Khomeini is exiled to Turkey for his outspoken denunciation of the shah's Status of Forces bill, which grants U.S. military personnel diplomatic immunity for crimes committed on Iranian soil.» Дата обращения: 21 мая 2016. Архивировано 19 апреля 2021 года.
Staff writer(s). Central Intelligence Agency\Directorate of Intelligence\Intelligence Report\Centers of Power in Iran (неопр.). Source: Central Intelligence Agency, OCI Files, Job 79T00832A, Box 9, 46. Secret; No Foreign Dissem. Prepared in the Office of Current Intelligence and coordinated within CIA. (май 1972). — «[P]laying an essentially negative role at present... are the clergy, whose strength lies in the emotions of the Iranian masses and whose opposition to the Shah's government is nearly total...Detailed information on the clergy is not available. There are perhaps 100,000 clergymen ranging from the mullah, the lowest clerical post, to the mojtahed.» Дата обращения: 21 мая 2016. Архивировано 27 марта 2021 года.
Staff writer(s) (7 декабря 2009). How Iran's opposition inverts old slogans. BBC. Архивировано 2 января 2010. Дата обращения: 21 мая 2016. One of the big anti-Shah chants ended with the slogan "Death to Shah!"...A main revolutionary cry was: "Estaghlal, Azadi, Jomhuriye Eslami" (Eng: Independence, Freedom, Islamic Republic).
Iran & the Great Satan
This Week in History: Ayatollah Khomeini returns to Iran - Features (неопр.). The Jerusalem Post. Дата обращения: 5 августа 2022. Архивировано 11 февраля 2021 года.