Sign In

Login

Password

Forgot Password ? Sign Up

Генетически модифицированная пища (Russian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Генетически модифицированная пища" in Russian language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Russian rank
78web.archive.org
1st place
1st place
29webcitation.org
24th place
2nd place
24nih.gov
4th place
6th place
16doi.org
2nd place
3rd place
13wikipedia.org
low place
low place
11isaaa.org
low place
7,780th place
9nature.com
234th place
157th place
5europa.eu
68th place
107th place
4pnas.org
1,293rd place
571st place
3springerlink.com
2,569th place
1,084th place
3fda.gov
447th place
541st place
3wto.org
3,346th place
3,639th place
2basf.com
low place
low place
2nap.edu
2,128th place
3,475th place
2who.int
195th place
128th place
2trv-science.ru
low place
1,462nd place
2rg.ru
270th place
20th place
2rada.gov.ua
324th place
58th place
2gmo-compass.org
low place
low place
2tufts.edu
155th place
807th place
1pgeconomics.co.uk
low place
low place
1agbioforum.org
low place
low place
1monsanto.com
low place
low place
1aatf-africa.org
low place
low place
1agbios.com
low place
low place
1plantphysiol.org
low place
low place
1ama-assn.org
3,257th place
2,381st place
1fao.org
318th place
403rd place
1aaas.org
9,065th place
low place
1loc.gov
70th place
289th place
1archive.org
6th place
9th place
1argenbio.org
low place
low place
1cdc.gov
218th place
209th place
1namamillers.org
low place
low place
1sessonudo.net
low place
low place
1mindfully.org
low place
low place
1biolsci.org
low place
low place
1tandfonline.com
507th place
654th place
1imdb.com
16th place
16th place
1discovermagazine.com
3,042nd place
2,669th place
1archive-it.org
910th place
1,678th place
1huntingdon.com
low place
low place
1harlan.com
low place
low place
1reuters.com
49th place
61st place
1newscientist.com
774th place
875th place
1cosmosmagazine.com
low place
low place
1washingtonpost.com
34th place
95th place
1academie-sciences.fr
7,547th place
3,467th place
1enveurope.com
low place
low place
1sciencedirect.com
149th place
195th place
1defra.gov.uk
7,481st place
low place
1nationalarchives.gov.uk
744th place
1,441st place
1ingentaconnect.com
3,306th place
4,340th place
1sciencemag.org
857th place
399th place
1confex.com
6,094th place
8,057th place
1agrosector.com.ua
low place
low place
1vedomosti.ru
721st place
47th place
1interfax.ru
855th place
54th place
1kmu.gov.ua
3,215th place
1,009th place
1epravda.com.ua
7,332nd place
1,948th place
1usda.gov
438th place
890th place
1epa.gov
882nd place
1,961st place
1gpo.gov
1,360th place
2,769th place
1gpoaccess.gov
7,750th place
low place
1biotradestatus.com
low place
low place
1jrc.es
low place
low place

aaas.org

  • Statement by the AAAS Board of Directors On Labeling of Genetically Modified Foods. American Association for the Advancement of Science (20 октября 2012). — «The EU, for example, has invested more than €300 million in research on the biosafety of GMOs. Its recent report states: "The main conclusion to be drawn from the efforts of more than 130 research projects, covering a period of more than 25 years of research and involving more than 500 independent research groups, is that biotechnology, and in particular GMOs, are not per se more risky than e.g. conventional plant breeding technologies." The World Health Organization, the American Medical Association, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, the British Royal Society, and every other respected organization that has examined the evidence has come to the same conclusion: consuming foods containing ingredients derived from GM crops is no riskier than consuming the same foods containing ingredients from crop plants modified by conventional plant improvement techniques.» Дата обращения: 8 февраля 2016. Архивировано 7 декабря 2019 года.

    Pinholster, Ginger AAAS Board of Directors: Legally Mandating GM Food Labels Could "Mislead and Falsely Alarm Consumers". American Association for the Advancement of Science (25 октября 2012). Дата обращения: 8 февраля 2016. Архивировано 3 февраля 2016 года.

aatf-africa.org

academie-sciences.fr

agbioforum.org

agbios.com

agrosector.com.ua

journal.agrosector.com.ua

ama-assn.org

  • AMA Report on Genetically Modified Crops and Foods (online summary). American Medical Association (январь 2001). — «A report issued by the scientific council of the American Medical Association (AMA) says that no long-term health effects have been detected from the use of transgenic crops and genetically modified foods, and that these foods are substantially equivalent to their conventional counterparts. (from online summary prepared by ISAAA) Crops and foods produced using recombinant DNA techniques have been available for fewer than 10 years and no long-term effects have been detected to date. These foods are substantially equivalent to their conventional counterparts. (from original report by AMA: [1])». Дата обращения: 19 марта 2016. Архивировано 2 апреля 2016 года.
    Report 2 of the Council on Science and Public Health (A-12): Labeling of Bioengineered Foods. American Medical Association (2012). — «Bioengineered foods have been consumed for close to 20 years, and during that time, no overt consequences on human health have been reported and/or substantiated in the peer-reviewed literature.» Дата обращения: 19 марта 2016. Архивировано 7 сентября 2012 года.

archive-it.org

wayback.archive-it.org

archive.org

argenbio.org

  • Some medical organizations, including the British Medical Association, advocate further caution based upon the precautionary principle:
    Genetically modified foods and health: a second interim statement. British Medical Association (март 2004). — «In our view, the potential for GM foods to cause harmful health effects is very small and many of the concerns expressed apply with equal vigour to conventionally derived foods. However, safety concerns cannot, as yet, be dismissed completely on the basis of information currently available.
    When seeking to optimise the balance between benefits and risks, it is prudent to err on the side of caution and, above all, learn from accumulating knowledge and experience. Any new technology such as genetic modification must be examined for possible benefits and risks to human health and the environment. As with all novel foods, safety assessments in relation to GM foods must be made on a case-by-case basis.
    Members of the GM jury project were briefed on various aspects of genetic modification by a diverse group of acknowledged experts in the relevant subjects. The GM jury reached the conclusion that the sale of GM foods currently available should be halted and the moratorium on commercial growth of GM crops should be continued. These conclusions were based on the precautionary principle and lack of evidence of any benefit. The Jury expressed concern over the impact of GM crops on farming, the environment, food safety and other potential health effects.
    The Royal Society review (2002) concluded that the risks to human health associated with the use of specific viral DNA sequences in GM plants are negligible, and while calling for caution in the introduction of potential allergens into food crops, stressed the absence of evidence that commercially available GM foods cause clinical allergic manifestations. The BMA shares the view that that there is no robust evidence to prove that GM foods are unsafe but we endorse the call for further research and surveillance to provide convincing evidence of safety and benefit."». Дата обращения: 21 марта 2016. Архивировано 29 июля 2016 года.

basf.com

biolsci.org

biotradestatus.com

cdc.gov

confex.com

nabs.confex.com

cosmosmagazine.com

defra.gov.uk

discovermagazine.com

blogs.discovermagazine.com

doi.org

dx.doi.org

enveurope.com

epa.gov

epravda.com.ua

europa.eu

efsa.europa.eu

registerofquestions.efsa.europa.eu

ec.europa.eu

  • A decade of EU-funded GMO research (2001–2010) (англ.). — Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. Biotechnologies, Agriculture, Food. European Commission, European Union., 2010. — ISBN 978-92-79-16344-9. — doi:10.2777/97784. Архивировано 17 августа 2019 года.

europa.eu

fao.org

  • State of Food and Agriculture 2003–2004. Agricultural Biotechnology: Meeting the Needs of the Poor. Health and environmental impacts of transgenic crops. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2004). — «Currently available transgenic crops and foods derived from them have been judged safe to eat and the methods used to test their safety have been deemed appropriate. These conclusions represent the consensus of the scientific evidence surveyed by the ICSU (2003) and they are consistent with the views of the World Health Organization (WHO, 2002). These foods have been assessed for increased risks to human health by several national regulatory authorities (inter alia, Argentina, Brazil, Canada, China, the United Kingdom and the United States) using their national food safety procedures (ICSU). To date no verifiable untoward toxic or nutritionally deleterious effects resulting from the consumption of foods derived from genetically modified crops have been discovered anywhere in the world (GM Science Review Panel). Many millions of people have consumed foods derived from GM plants - mainly maize, soybean and oilseed rape - without any observed adverse effects (ICSU).» Дата обращения: 8 февраля 2016. Архивировано 9 января 2019 года.

fda.gov

gmo-compass.org

gpo.gov

access.gpo.gov

gpoaccess.gov

ecfr.gpoaccess.gov

harlan.com

huntingdon.com

imdb.com

ingentaconnect.com

interfax.ru

isaaa.org

jrc.es

ftp.jrc.es

kmu.gov.ua

loc.gov

  • Restrictions on Genetically Modified Organisms: United States. Public and Scholarly Opinion. Library of Congress (9 июня 2015). — «Several scientific organizations in the US have issued studies or statements regarding the safety of GMOs indicating that there is no evidence that GMOs present unique safety risks compared to conventionally bred products. These include the National Research Council, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and the American Medical Association. Groups in the US opposed to GMOs include some environmental organizations, organic farming organizations, and consumer organizations. A substantial number of legal academics have criticized the US's approach to regulating GMOs.» Дата обращения: 8 февраля 2016. Архивировано 27 марта 2020 года.

mindfully.org

monsanto.com

namamillers.org

nap.edu

  • United States Institute of Medicine and National Research Council (2004). Safety of Genetically Engineered Foods: Approaches to Assessing Unintended Health Effects. National Academies Press. Free full-text Архивная копия от 21 октября 2014 на Wayback Machine. National Academies Press. pp R9-10: «In contrast to adverse health effects that have been associated with some traditional food production methods, similar serious health effects have not been identified as a result of genetic engineering techniques used in food production. This may be because developers of bioengineered organisms perform extensive compositional analyses to determine that each phenotype is desirable and to ensure that unintended changes have not occurred in key components of food.»
  • Genetically Engineered Crops: Experiences and Prospects 149. The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (US) (2016). — «Overall finding on purported adverse effects on human health of foods derived from GE crops: On the basis of detailed examination of comparisons of currently commercialized GE with non-GE foods in compositional analysis, acute and chronic animal toxicity tests, long-term data on health of livestock fed GE foods, and human epidemiological data, the committee found no differences that implicate a higher risk to human health from GE foods than from their non-GE counterparts.» Дата обращения: 19 мая 2016. Архивировано 25 августа 2019 года.

nationalarchives.gov.uk

webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk

nature.com

newscientist.com

nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

pgeconomics.co.uk

plantphysiol.org

pnas.org

rada.gov.ua

zakon.rada.gov.ua

reuters.com

rg.ru

sciencedirect.com

sciencemag.org

sessonudo.net

springerlink.com

tandfonline.com

trv-science.ru

tufts.edu

tufts.edu

emerald.tufts.edu

usda.gov

aphis.usda.gov

vedomosti.ru

washingtonpost.com

web.archive.org

webcitation.org

who.int

  • Часто задаваемые вопросы по генетически модифицированным продуктам питания (На Русском). Всемирная организация здравоохранения. Дата обращения: 18 ноября 2019. Архивировано 21 октября 2019 года.
  • Frequently asked questions on genetically modified foods. World Health Organization. — «Different GM organisms include different genes inserted in different ways. This means that individual GM foods and their safety should be assessed on a case-by-case basis and that it is not possible to make general statements on the safety of all GM foods.
    GM foods currently available on the international market have passed safety assessments and are not likely to present risks for human health. In addition, no effects on human health have been shown as a result of the consumption of such foods by the general population in the countries where they have been approved. Continuous application of safety assessments based on the Codex Alimentarius principles and, where appropriate, adequate post market monitoring, should form the basis for ensuring the safety of GM foods.» Дата обращения: 8 февраля 2016. Архивировано 10 мая 2020 года.

wikipedia.org

en.wikipedia.org

wto.org