Записки из подполья (Russian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Записки из подполья" in Russian language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Russian rank

1^st place

6^th place

9^th place

838^th place

451^st place

699^th place

1,318^th place

146^th place

441^st place

16^th place

1,363^rd place

1,636^th place

archive.org

Kaufmann, Walter. Existentialism From Dostoevsky to Sartre. — New York : Meridian Books, 1956. — P. 52.
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. Problems in Dostoevsky's Poetics. — Ann Arbor, MI : Ardis, 1973. — P. 150–159.
Morson, Gary. The Boundaries of Genre: Dostoevsky's Diary of a Writer and the Traditions of Literary Utopia. — Evanston, IL : Northwestern University Press, 1981. — P. 130.

Bird, Robert. «Introduction: Dostoevsky’s Wager Архивная копия от 6 июля 2020 на Wayback Machine.» Pp. vii-xxiv in Notes from Underground, translated by B. Yakim. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans. p. x Архивная копия от 6 июля 2020 на Wayback Machine: «The views that brought Chernyshevsky to this vision were close to utilitarianism, meaning that actions should be judged in terms of their expediency. Naturally, utilitarians assumed that we can know the standard against which expediency can be measured: usually it was economic well-being. In Chernyshevsky’s rational egotism [sic], utlitarianism as a method coincided with socialism as a goal: in essence, it is in everyone’s individual self-interest that the whole of society flourish.»

"Can Dostoevsky Still Kick You in the Gut?". The New Yorker (англ.). Архивировано 5 сентября 2018. Дата обращения: 31 октября 2018. {{cite news}}: Указан более чем один параметр |accessdate= and |access-date= (справка)

Bird, Robert. «Introduction: Dostoevsky’s Wager Архивная копия от 6 июля 2020 на Wayback Machine.» Pp. vii-xxiv in Notes from Underground, translated by B. Yakim. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans. p. x Архивная копия от 6 июля 2020 на Wayback Machine: «The views that brought Chernyshevsky to this vision were close to utilitarianism, meaning that actions should be judged in terms of their expediency. Naturally, utilitarians assumed that we can know the standard against which expediency can be measured: usually it was economic well-being. In Chernyshevsky’s rational egotism [sic], utlitarianism as a method coincided with socialism as a goal: in essence, it is in everyone’s individual self-interest that the whole of society flourish.»
"Can Dostoevsky Still Kick You in the Gut?". The New Yorker (англ.). Архивировано 5 сентября 2018. Дата обращения: 31 октября 2018. {{cite news}}: Указан более чем один параметр |accessdate= and |access-date= (справка)
Zapiski Neizvestnogo Архивная копия от 20 января 2009 на Wayback Machine // Myspace