Легенда о Керете (Russian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Легенда о Керете" in Russian language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Russian rank

7books.google.com

3^rd place

10^th place

6web.archive.org

1^st place

1jstor.org

26^th place

145^th place

books.google.com

Samuel Henry Hooke. Middle Eastern Mythology. Архивная копия от 2 июля 2014 на Wayback Machine Dover Publications, 2004. ISBN 978-0-486-43551-0; pages 87-89.
Baruch Margalit. The Legend of Keret Архивная копия от 1 января 2014 на Wayback Machine. In: Wilfred G. E. Watson, and Nicolas Wyatt (editors). Handbook of Ugaritic Studies. Архивная копия от 1 января 2014 на Wayback Machine Brill Academic Publishers. 1999. ISBN 978-90-04-10988-9; Quote from page 203:"The poem of Keret is one of the three major literary works which gifted Canaanite poets of the Late Bronze Age (ca. 1500—1200 BCE) bequeathed serendipitously to 20th century civilization."
Baruch Margalit. The Legend of Keret Архивная копия от 1 января 2014 на Wayback Machine. In: Wilfred G. E. Watson, and Nicolas Wyatt (editors). Handbook of Ugaritic Studies. Архивная копия от 1 января 2014 на Wayback Machine Brill Academic Publishers. 1999. ISBN 978-90-04-10988-9; pages 203—233.
Johannes Cornelis de Moor. An Anthology of Religious Texts from Ugarit. Архивная копия от 1 января 2014 на Wayback Machine E.J. Brill, 1987. ISBN 90-04-08330-8; page 224.
Johannes Cornelis de Moor. An Anthology of Religious Texts from Ugarit. E.J. Brill, 1987. ISBN 90-04-08330-8; page 191.
Baruch Margalit. The Legend of Keret Архивная копия от 2 июля 2014 на Wayback Machine. In: Wilfred G. E. Watson, and Nicolas Wyatt (editors). Handbook of Ugaritic Studies. Архивная копия от 2 июля 2014 на Wayback Machine Brill Academic Publishers. 1999. ISBN 978-90-04-10988-9; pages 204—218: Section 2.2: The history of (mis)interpretation.
Samuel Henry Hooke. Middle Eastern Mythology. Архивная копия от 2 июля 2014 на Wayback Machine Dover Publications, 2004. ISBN 978-0-486-43551-0; pages 87-89. Quote from page 89: "Some substratum of historical tradition may underlie this curious legend, but it is clear that it is mainly mythological, and some parts of it suggest connection with ritual.

jstor.org

Cyrus H. Gordon. Notes on the Legend of Keret. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, Vol. 11, No. 3 (Jul., 1952), pp. 212—213.

web.archive.org

Samuel Henry Hooke. Middle Eastern Mythology. Архивная копия от 2 июля 2014 на Wayback Machine Dover Publications, 2004. ISBN 978-0-486-43551-0; pages 87-89.
Baruch Margalit. The Legend of Keret Архивная копия от 1 января 2014 на Wayback Machine. In: Wilfred G. E. Watson, and Nicolas Wyatt (editors). Handbook of Ugaritic Studies. Архивная копия от 1 января 2014 на Wayback Machine Brill Academic Publishers. 1999. ISBN 978-90-04-10988-9; Quote from page 203:"The poem of Keret is one of the three major literary works which gifted Canaanite poets of the Late Bronze Age (ca. 1500—1200 BCE) bequeathed serendipitously to 20th century civilization."
Baruch Margalit. The Legend of Keret Архивная копия от 1 января 2014 на Wayback Machine. In: Wilfred G. E. Watson, and Nicolas Wyatt (editors). Handbook of Ugaritic Studies. Архивная копия от 1 января 2014 на Wayback Machine Brill Academic Publishers. 1999. ISBN 978-90-04-10988-9; pages 203—233.
Johannes Cornelis de Moor. An Anthology of Religious Texts from Ugarit. Архивная копия от 1 января 2014 на Wayback Machine E.J. Brill, 1987. ISBN 90-04-08330-8; page 224.
Baruch Margalit. The Legend of Keret Архивная копия от 2 июля 2014 на Wayback Machine. In: Wilfred G. E. Watson, and Nicolas Wyatt (editors). Handbook of Ugaritic Studies. Архивная копия от 2 июля 2014 на Wayback Machine Brill Academic Publishers. 1999. ISBN 978-90-04-10988-9; pages 204—218: Section 2.2: The history of (mis)interpretation.
Samuel Henry Hooke. Middle Eastern Mythology. Архивная копия от 2 июля 2014 на Wayback Machine Dover Publications, 2004. ISBN 978-0-486-43551-0; pages 87-89. Quote from page 89: "Some substratum of historical tradition may underlie this curious legend, but it is clear that it is mainly mythological, and some parts of it suggest connection with ritual.