Leiter L. D.The Pathology of Organized SkepticismАрхивная копия от 16 декабря 2011 на Wayback Machine // Journal of Scientific Exploration, 2002. Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 125—128. «…PhACT members and, I suspect, members of all skeptical organizations, have an obvious and well-known bias toward disbelief. … Each one who has disclosed personal details of their formative years, say up until their early 20’s, has had an unfortunate experience with a faith-based philosophy, most often a conventional major religion. … Thus, they gravitate to what appears to them to be the ultimate non-faith-based philosophy, Science. Unfortunately, while they loudly proclaim their righteousness, based on their professed adherence to „hard science“, they do so with the one thing no true scientist can afford to possess, a closed mind. Instead of becoming scientifically minded, they become adherents of scientism, the belief system in which science and only science has all the answers to everything».
«Science and Pseudoscience»Архивная копия от 5 сентября 2015 на Wayback Machine in. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy; Laudan, Larry (1983). «The demise of the demarcation problem», in R.S. Cohan and L. Laudan (eds.), Physics, Philosophy, and Psychoanalysiss: Essays in Honor of Adolf Grünbaum, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science , 76, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 111—127. ISBN 90-277-1533-5
tricksterbook.com
Hansen, G. P.CSICOP and the Skeptics: An Overview : [англ.] : [арх. 10 мая 2010] // The Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research. — January 1992. — Vol. 86, No. 1. — P. 19−63.
web.archive.org
Hansen, G. P.CSICOP and the Skeptics: An Overview : [англ.] : [арх. 10 мая 2010] // The Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research. — January 1992. — Vol. 86, No. 1. — P. 19−63.
«Science and Pseudoscience»Архивная копия от 5 сентября 2015 на Wayback Machine in. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy; Laudan, Larry (1983). «The demise of the demarcation problem», in R.S. Cohan and L. Laudan (eds.), Physics, Philosophy, and Psychoanalysiss: Essays in Honor of Adolf Grünbaum, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science , 76, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 111—127. ISBN 90-277-1533-5
Leiter L. D.The Pathology of Organized SkepticismАрхивная копия от 16 декабря 2011 на Wayback Machine // Journal of Scientific Exploration, 2002. Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 125—128. «…PhACT members and, I suspect, members of all skeptical organizations, have an obvious and well-known bias toward disbelief. … Each one who has disclosed personal details of their formative years, say up until their early 20’s, has had an unfortunate experience with a faith-based philosophy, most often a conventional major religion. … Thus, they gravitate to what appears to them to be the ultimate non-faith-based philosophy, Science. Unfortunately, while they loudly proclaim their righteousness, based on their professed adherence to „hard science“, they do so with the one thing no true scientist can afford to possess, a closed mind. Instead of becoming scientifically minded, they become adherents of scientism, the belief system in which science and only science has all the answers to everything».
