Sign In

Login

Password

Forgot Password ? Sign Up

Список самых кассовых фильмов (Russian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Список самых кассовых фильмов" in Russian language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Russian rank
322web.archive.org
1st place
1st place
217boxofficemojo.com
21st place
19th place
110google.co.uk
504th place
300th place
23tcm.com
235th place
837th place
18the-numbers.com
110th place
164th place
17books.google.com
3rd place
10th place
15news.google.com
59th place
334th place
13wikipedia.org
low place
low place
13boxoffice.com
5,353rd place
5,144th place
8archive.org
6th place
9th place
7variety.com
13th place
29th place
5nytimes.com
7th place
23rd place
4worldcat.org
5th place
5th place
3latimes.com
22nd place
66th place
3thewrap.com
112th place
183rd place
3telegraph.co.uk
30th place
65th place
3ghostarchive.org
32nd place
880th place
3webcitation.org
24th place
2nd place
3wsj.com
79th place
210th place
2economist.com
254th place
250th place
2bbc.co.uk
8th place
30th place
2bloomberg.com
99th place
216th place
2filmsite.org
1,615th place
1,101st place
2cinemaweb.com
low place
low place
2hollywoodreporter.com
15th place
33rd place
2forbes.com
54th place
93rd place
2deadline.com
10th place
17th place
2gizmodo.com
474th place
803rd place
2time.com
61st place
116th place
1entgroup.cn
8,849th place
low place
1maoyan.com
low place
low place
1slate.com
259th place
618th place
1usi.edu
low place
low place
1theguardian.com
12th place
39th place
1washingtonpost.com
34th place
95th place
1imf.org
142nd place
102nd place
1marketwatch.com
1,303rd place
2,789th place
1suntimes.com
327th place
353rd place
1mandilaw.com
low place
low place
1guinnessworldrecords.com
550th place
613th place
1cia.gov
89th place
71st place
1doi.org
2nd place
3rd place
1focusfeatures.com
7,608th place
9,292nd place
1archives.gov
446th place
905th place
1measuringworth.com
2,465th place
low place
1turner.com
4,080th place
9,239th place
1pqarchiver.com
490th place
958th place
1newsbank.com
414th place
1,167th place
1ew.com
35th place
55th place
1newsweek.com
269th place
547th place

archive.org

archives.gov

bbc.co.uk

news.bbc.co.uk

bloomberg.com

books.google.com

  • Hall & Neale, 2010, p. 179. "Later epics proved far more disastrous for the backers. Samuel Bronston's The Fall of the Roman Empire, filmed in Spain, cost $17,816,876 and grossed only $1.9 million in America. George Stevens's long-gestating life of Christ, The Greatest Story Ever Told (1965), which had been in planning since 1954 and in production since 1962, earned domestic rentals of $6,962,715 on a $21,481,745 negative cost, the largest amount yet spent on a production made entirely within the United States. The Bible—in the Beginning... (1966) was financed by the Italian producer Dino De Laurentiis from private investors and Swiss banks. He then sold distribution rights outside Italy jointly to Fox and Seven Arts for $15 million (70 percent of which came from Fox), thereby recouping the bulk of his $18 million investment. Although The Bible returned a respectable world rental of $25.3 million, Fox was still left with a net loss of just over $1.5 million. It was the last biblical epic to be released by any major Hollywood studio for nearly twenty years."
  • Wasko, Janet. The Hollywood Film Industry: A Reader. — Routledge, 1986. — P. 34. — «Various accounts have cited $15 to $18 million profits during the first few years of release, while in a letter to a potential investor in the proposed sound version, Aitken noted that a $15 to $18 million box-office gross was a 'conservative estimate'. For years Variety has listed The Birth of a Nation's total rental at $50 million. (This reflects the total amount paid to the distributor, not box-office gross.) This 'trade legend' has finally been acknowledged by Variety as a 'whopper myth', and the amount has been revised to $5 million. That figure seems far more feasible, as reports of earnings in the Griffith collection list gross receipts for 1915–1919 at slightly more than $5.2 million (including foreign distribution) and total earnings after deducting general office expenses, but not royalties, at about $2 million.».». — ISBN 9780710097309.
  • Krämer, Peter. Women First: Titanic, Action-Aventure Films, and Hollywood's Female Audience // Titanic: Anatomy of a Blockbuster / Sandler, Kevin S.; Studlar, Gaylyn. — Издательство Ратгерского университета, 1999. — С. 108—131. — ISBN 9780813526690.. — «p. 130: The list has Jurassic Park at number one with $913 million, followed by The Lion King…».
  • Vance, Jeffrey. Douglas Fairbanks. — Издательство Калифорнийского университета, 2008. — С. 146. — ISBN 9780520256675.. — «The film had a production cost of $930,042.78—more than the cost of D.W. Griffith’s Intolerance and nearly as much as Erich von Stroheim’s Foolish Wives (1922).».
  • Finler, 2003, p. 320. «It was up and running in time to handle Disney’s most elaborate expensive feature, 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea, based on the book by Jules Verne, starring James Mason and Kirk Douglas and directed by Richard Fleischer at a cost of $4.5 million.»
  • Ross, Steven J. Hollywood Left and Right: How Movie Stars Shaped American Politics (англ.). — Издательство Оксфордского университета, 2011. — P. 278–279. — ISBN 9780199911431.. — «Costing $15 million to produce, the film earned $47 million by the end of 1961 and $90 million worldwide by January 1989.».
  • Block, Hayley Taylor (2010), Love Story, p. 545, The final cost came in at $2,260,000. In: Block & Wilson, 2010.
  • Block & Wilson, 2010, p. 541. «Screenwriter and director George Seaton was given a then-whopping production budget of $10 million to make what would be his last big movie after a long career as an actor in radio, a screenwriter, and a director.»
  • Block & Wilson, 2010, p. 549. «Fiddler had the highest domestic box office of 1971 (it was second in worldwide box office after Diamonds Are Forever), with more than $100 million in unadjusted worldwide box office on its initial release. The soundtrack album was also a huge seller. The 1979 rerelease was not as successful, with the $3.8 million print and ad costs almost as high as the $4.3 million in worldwide rentals.»
  • Block & Wilson, 2010, p. 549. «Fiddler had the highest domestic box office of 1971 (it was second in worldwide box office after Diamonds Are Forever), with more than $100 million in unadjusted worldwide box office on its initial release. The soundtrack album was also a huge seller. The 1979 rerelease was not as successful, with the $3.8 million print and ad costs almost as high as the $4.3 million in worldwide rentals.»
  • Block & Wilson, 2010, p. 609. «Steven Spielberg, by far the most successful director of the decade, had the highest-grossing movie with 1982’s E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial, which grossed over $664 million in worldwide box office on initial release.»
  • Block & Wilson, 2010, p. 652. «Production Cost: $12.2 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s).»
  • Finler, 2003, pp. 190–191.
  • Block & Wilson, 2010, p. 664. «Production Cost: $28.2 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s).»
  • Finler, 2003, p. 268. «The studio had a record operating income of $212 million in 1982, the year of Spielberg’s E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial (which had cost only slightly over $10 million) and $150 million in 1985, mainly due to another Spielberg production, the $22 million Back to the Future, which became the top box office hit of the year.»
  • Finler, 2003, p. 244. «Rain Man: 30.0 (cost in million $s)»
  • Block & Wilson, 2010, pp. 776

boxoffice.com

pro.boxoffice.com

boxofficemojo.com

cia.gov

cinemaweb.com

deadline.com

doi.org

  • May, Richard P. (Fall 2005), Restoring The Big Parade, The Moving Image, 5 (2): 140–146, doi:10.1353/mov.2005.0033, ISSN 1532-3978, ...earning somewhere between $18 and $22 million, depending on the figures consulted

economist.com

entgroup.cn

english.entgroup.cn

ew.com

filmsite.org

focusfeatures.com

forbes.com

ghostarchive.org

gizmodo.com

io9.gizmodo.com

google.co.uk

books.google.co.uk

  • Cones, John W. The feature film distribution deal: a critical analysis of the single most important film industry agreement (англ.). — Издательство Саутерн Иллинойсского университета, 1997. — P. 41. — ISBN 978-0-8093-2082-0.. — «Distributor rentals: It is also important to know and recognize the difference between the distributor's gross receipts and the gross rentals. The term "rentals" refers to the aggregate amount of the film distributor's share of monies paid at theatre box offices computed on the basis of negotiated agreements between the distributor and the exhibitor. Note that gross receipts refers to amounts actually received and from all markets and media, whereas gross rentals refers to amounts earned from theatrical exhibition only, regardless of whether received by the distributor. Thus, gross receipts is the much broader term and includes distributor rentals. The issue of film rentals (i.e., what percentage of a film's box office gross comes back to the distributor) is of key importance...More current numbers suggest that distributor rentals for the major studio/distributor released films average in the neighborhood of 43% of box office gross. Again, however, such an average is based on widely divergent distributor rental ratios on individual films.».
  • Marich, Robert. Marketing to moviegoers: a handbook of strategies used by major studios and independents (англ.). — 2. — Издательство Саутерн Иллинойсского университета, 2009. — P. 252. — ISBN 9780809328840.. — «Rentals are the distributors' share of the box office gross and typically set by a complex, two-part contract.».
  • Balio, Tino. The American film industry. — Издательство Висконсинского университета, 2005. — С. 296. — ISBN 978-0-299-09874-2.. — «Film Rentals as Percent of Volume of Business (1939): 36.4».
  • Balio, Tino. United Artists: the Company that Changed the Film Industry (англ.). — Издательство Висконсинского университета, 1987. — P. 124–125. — ISBN 978-0-299-11440-4.. — «To rekindle interest in the movies, Hollywood not only had to compete with television but also with other leisure-time activities…Movies made a comeback by 1955, but audiences had changed. Moviegoing became a special event for most people, creating the phenomenon of the big picture.».
  • Finler, 2003, p. 358
  • Parkinson, David. The Rough Guide to Film Musicals. — Dorling Kindersley, 2007. — С. 28. — ISBN 978-1-84353-650-5.. — «But they had previously succeeded in showing how musicals could centre on ordinary people with Sunny Side Up (1929), which had grossed $2 million at the box office and demonstrated a new maturity and ingenuity in the staging of story and dance.».
  • Hall & Neale, 2010, pp. 6–7. «For similar reasons of accountability, Variety has typically used figures for domestic (U.S. and Canadian) rather than worldwide revenue. This became its standard policy in 1940, when the advent of war in Europe persuaded the American film industry (temporarily, as it turned out) that it should be wholly reliant on the home market for profitability. Where specific rentals data are reported in Variety before this (which tended to be only sporadically) they were often for worldwide rather domestic performance. This was also the case with other trade sources, such as Quigleýs annual Motion Picture Almanac, which published its own all-time hits lists from the early 1930s onward. The subsequent confusion of domestic and worldwide figures, and of rental and box-office figures, has plagued many published accounts of Hollywood history (sometimes including those in Variety itself), and we have attempted to be diligant in clarifying the differences between them.»
  • Block & Wilson, 2010, p. 237. «By the end of 1938, it had grossed more than $8 million in worldwide rentals and was ranked at the time as the second-highest-grossing film after the 1925 epic Ben-Hur».
  • Finler, 2003, p. 47. «Walt Disney took a big risk when he decided to invest $1.5 million in his first feature-length animated film, Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. It became the biggest hit of the sound era and the largest-grossing movie since The Birth of a Nation — until the release of independent producer David O. Selznick’s Gone with the Wind just two years later.»
  • Barrios, Richard. A Song in the Dark: The Birth of the Musical Film (англ.). — Издательство Оксфордского университета, 1995. — P. 49. — ISBN 9780195088113.. — «Since it’s rarely seen today, The Singing Fool is frequently confused with The Jazz Singer; although besides Jolson and a pervasively maudlin air the two have little in common. In the earlier film Jolson was inordinately attached to his mother and sang „Mammy“; here the fixation was on his young son, and „Sonny Boy“ became an enormous hit. So did the film, which amassed a stunning world-wide gross of $5.9 million…Some sources give it as the highest gross of any film in its initial release prior to Gone with the Wind. This is probably overstating it—MGM’s records show that Ben-Hur and The Big Parade grossed more, and no one knows just how much The Birth of a Nation brought in. Still, by the standards of the time it’s an amazing amount.».
  • Everson, William K. American silent film. — Da Capo Press, 1998. — С. 374. — ISBN 978-0-306-80876-0.. — «Putting The Birth of a Nation in fifth place is open to question, since it is generally conceded to be the top-grossing film of all time. However, it has always been difficult to obtain reliable box-office figures for this film, and it may have been even more difficult in the mid-1930’s. After listing it until the mid-1970’s as the top-grosser, though finding it impossible to quote exact figures, Variety, the trade journal, suddenly repudiated the claim but without giving specific details or reasons. On the basis of the number of paid admissions, and continuous exhibition, its number one position seems justified.».
  • Hall & Neale, 2010, p. 163. «MGM’s silent Ben-Hur, which opened at the end of 1925, had out-grossed all the other pictures released by the company in 1926 combined. With worldwide rentals of $9,386,000 on first release it was, with the sole possible exception of The Birth of a Nation, the highest-earning film of the entire silent era.»
  • Christian Herald. — 1965. — Т. 88. — С. 68.
  • Hall & Neale, 2010, pp. 160–161. «General release began at normal prices in 1959 and continued until the end of the following year, when the film was temporarily withdrawn (the first of several reissues came in 1966). The worldwide rental by this time was around $60 million. In the domestic market it dislodged Gone with the Wind from the number one position on Varietýs list of All-Time Rentals Champs. GWTW had hitherto maintained its lead through several reissues (and was soon to regain it through another in 1961).»
  • Block & Wilson, 2010, p. 324. «Worldwide rentals: $66.1 million (initial release)»
  • Cook, David A. Lost Illusions: American Cinema in the Shadow of Watergate and Vietnam, 1970–1979 (англ.). — Издательство Калифорнийского университета, 2002. — Vol. Volume 9 of History of the American Cinema, Charles Harpole. — P. 50. — ISBN 9780520232655.. — «The industry was stunned when Star Wars earned nearly $3 million in its first week and by the end of August had grossed $100 million; it played continuously throughout 1977—1978, and was officially re-released in 1978 and 1979, by the end of which it had earned $262 million in rentals worldwide to become the top- grossing film of all time — a position it would maintain until surpassed by Universal’s E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial in January 1983.».
  • Monaco, James. How to Read a Film:Movies, Media, and Beyond (англ.). — Издательство Оксфордского университета, 2009. — P. 262. — ISBN 9780199755790.. — «The Birth of a Nation, costing an unprecedented and, many believed, thoroughly foolhardy $110,000, eventually returned $20 million and more. The actual figure is hard to calculate because the film was distributed on a „states' rights“ basis in which licenses to show the film were sold outright. The actual cash generated by The Birth of a Nation may have been as much as $50 million to $100 million, an almost inconceivable amount for such an early film.».
  • Wasko, Janet. D.W. Griffiths and the banks: a case study in film financing // The Hollywood Film Industry: A Reader. — Routledge, 1986. — P. 34. — «Various accounts have cited $15 to $18 million profits during the first few years of release, while in a letter to a potential investor in the proposed sound version, Aitken noted that a $15 to $18 million box-office gross was a 'conservative estimate'. For years Variety has listed The Birth of a Nation's total rental at $50 million. (This reflects the total amount paid to the distributor, not box-office gross.) This 'trade legend' has finally been acknowledged by Variety as a 'whopper myth', and the amount has been revised to $5 million. That figure seems far more feasible, as reports of earnings in the Griffith collection list gross receipts for 1915–1919 at slightly more than $5.2 million (including foreign distribution) and total earnings after deducting general office expenses, but not royalties, at about $2 million.». — ISBN 9780710097309.
  • The Birth of a nation: D.W. Griffith, director (англ.) / Lang, Robert. — Издательство Ратгерского университета, 1994. — P. 30. — ISBN 978-0-8135-2027-8.. — «The film eventually cost $110,000 and was twelve reels long.».
  • The Birth of a nation: D.W. Griffith, director (англ.) / Lang, Robert. — Издательство Ратгерского университета, 1994. — P. 30. — ISBN 978-0-8135-2027-8.. — «The film eventually cost $110,000 and was twelve reels long.».
  • Birchard, Robert S. (2010), Intolerance, p. 45, Intolerance was the most expensive American film made up until that point, costing a total of $489,653, and its performance at the box ... but it did recoup its cost and end with respectable overall numbers. In: Block & Wilson, 2010.
  • Shipman, David. The great movie stars: the golden years. — Crown Publishing Group[англ.], 1970. — С. 98.. — «It was a low budgeter—$120,000—but it grossed world-wide over $3 million and made stars of Chaney and his fellow-players, Betty Compson and Thomas Meighan.».
  • Hall & Neale, 2010, p. 53. «The Four Forsemen of the Apocalypse was to become Metro’s most expensive production and one of the decade’s biggest box-office hits. Its production costs have been estimated at „something between $600,000 and $800,000.“ Variety estimated its worldwide gross at $4 million in 1925 and at $5 million in 1944; in 1991, it estimated its cumulative domestic rentals at $3,800,000.»
  • Brownlow, Kevin. The parade's gone by. — Издательство Калифорнийского университета, 1968. — С. 255. — ISBN 978-0-520-03068-8.. — «The negative cost was about $986,000, which did not include Fairbanks' own salary. Once the exploitation and release prints were taken into account, Robin Hood cost about $1,400,000—exceeding both Intolerance ($700,000) and the celebrated „million dollar movie“ Foolish Wives. But it earned $2,500,000.».
  • Robertson, Patrick. Guinness Book of Movie Facts and Feats. — 4. — Abbeville Publishing Group[англ.], 1991. — С. 30. — ISBN 9781558592360.. — «The top grossing silent film was King Vidor’s The Big Parade (US 25), with worldwide rentals of $22 million.».
  • Hall & Neale, 2010, pp. 58–59. «Even then, at a time when the budget for a feature averaged at around $300,000, no more than $382,000 was spent on production…According to the Eddie Mannix Ledger at MGM, it grossed $4,990,000 domestically and $1,141,000 abroad.»
  • Hall & Neale, 2010, p. 163. "MGM's silent Ben-Hur, which opened at the end of 1925, had out-grossed all the other pictures released by the company in 1926 combined. With worldwide rentals of $9,386,000 on first release it was, with the sole possible exception of The Birth of a Nation, the highest-earning film of the entire silent era. (At a negative cost of $3,967,000, it was also the most expensive.)"
  • Finler, 2003, p. 188. «At a cost of $2 million Wings was the studio’s most expensive movie of the decade, and though it did well it was not good enough to earn a profit.»
  • The Jazz Singer and The Singing Fool
    • Block, Hayley Taylor (2010), The Jazz Singer, p. 113, The film brought in $2.6 million in worldwide rentals and made a net profit of $1,196,750. Jolson's follow-up Warner Bros. film, The Singing Fool (1928), brought in over two times as much, with $5.9 in worldwide rentals and a profit of $3,649,000, making them two of the most profitable films in the 1920s.
    • Crafton, Donald. The Talkies: American Cinema's Transition to Sound, 1926–1931 (англ.). — Издательство Калифорнийского университета, 1999. — P. 549–552. — ISBN 9780520221284.. — «The Singing Fool: Negative Cost ($1000s): 388».
    • Birchard, Robert S. (2010), The Broadway Melody, p. 121, It earned $4.4 million in worldwide rentals and was the first movie to spawn sequels (there were several until 1940). In: Block & Wilson, 2010.
    • Block & Wilson, 2010, p. 46. «Production Cost: $0.6 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s).»
    • Cormack, Mike. Ideology and Cinematography in Hollywood, 1930–1939 (англ.). — Palgrave Macmillan, 1993. — P. 28. — ISBN 9780312100674.. — «Although costing $1250000—a huge sum for any studio in 1929—the film was a financial success. Karl Thiede gives the domestic box-office at $1500000, and the same figure for the foreign gross.».
    • Hell’s Angels
      • Balio, Tino. United Artists: The Company Built by the Stars (англ.). — Издательство Висконсинского университета, 1976. — P. 110.
      • Block & Wilson, 2010, p. 163. «It drew $1.4 million in worldwide rentals in its first run versus $1.2 million for Dracula, which had opened in February 1931.»
      • Vance, Jeffrey. Chaplin: genius of the cinema. — Abrams Books[англ.], 2003. — С. 208.. — «Chaplin’s negative cost for City Lights was $1,607,351. The film eventually earned him a worldwide profit of $5 million ($2 million domestically and $3 million in foreign distribution), an enormous sum of money for the time.».
      • Sedgwick, John. Popular Filmgoing In 1930s Britain: A Choice of Pleasures (англ.). — Издательство Эксетерского университета, 2000. — P. 146–148. — ISBN 9780859896603.
      • Sedgwick, John. Popular Filmgoing In 1930s Britain: A Choice of Pleasures (англ.). — Издательство Эксетерского университета, 2000. — P. 146–148. — ISBN 9780859896603.
      • Finler, 2003, p. 188. «The studio released its most profitable pictures of the decade in 1933, She Done Him Wrong and I’m No Angel, written by and starring Mae West. Produced at a rock-bottom cost of $200,000 each, they undoubtedly helped Paramount through the worst patch in its history…»
      • Block, Alex Ben (2010), She Done Him Wrong, p. 173, The worldwide rentals of over $3 million keep the lights on at Paramount, which did not shy away from selling the movie's sex appeal. In: Block & Wilson, 2010.
      • Phillips, Kendall R. Controversial Cinema: The Films That Outraged America (англ.). — ABC-CLIO, 2008. — P. 26. — ISBN 9781567207248.. — «The reaction to West’s first major film, however, was not exclusively negative. Made for a mere $200,000, the film would rake in a healthy $2 million in the United States and an additional million in overseas markets.».
      • Block & Wilson, 2010, p. 135. «Total production cost: $274,076 (Unadjusted $s).»
      • McBride, Joseph. Frank Capra: The Catastrophe of Success. — Издательство Миссисипского университета, 2011. — С. 309. — ISBN 9781604738384.. — «According to the studio’s books It Happened One Night brought in $1 million in film rentals during its initial release, but as Joe Walker pointed out, the figure would have been much larger if the film had not been sold to theaters on a block-booking basis in a package with more than two dozen lesser Columbia films, and the total rentals of the package spread among them all, as was customary in that era, since it minimized the risk and allowed the major studios to dominate the marketplace.».
      • Dick, Bernard F. Claudette Colbert: She Walked in Beauty. — Издательство Миссисипского университета, 2008. — С. 79. — ISBN 9781604730876.. — «Although Columbia’s president, Harry Cohn, had strong reservations about It Happened One Night, he also knew that it would not bankrupt the studio; the rights were only $5,000, and the budget was set at $325,000, including the performers' salaries.».
      • Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs
        • Monaco, Paul. A History of American Movies: A Film-By-Film Look at the Art, Craft, and Business of Cinema. — Scarecrow Press, 2010. — P. 54. — «Considered a highly risky gamble when the movie was in production in the mid-1930s, by the fiftieth anniversary of its 1937 premiere Snow White's earnings exceeded $330 million.». — ISBN 9780810874343.
        • Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs
          • Monaco, Paul. A History of American Movies: A Film-By-Film Look at the Art, Craft, and Business of Cinema. — Scarecrow Press, 2010. — P. 54. — «Considered a highly risky gamble when the movie was in production in the mid-1930s, by the fiftieth anniversary of its 1937 premiere Snow White's earnings exceeded $330 million.». — ISBN 9780810874343.
          • Hall & Neale, 2010, p. 283 ."The final negative cost of Gone with the Wind (GWTW) has been variously reported between $3.9 million and $4.25 million."
          • Barrier, Michael. Hollywood Cartoons: American Animation in Its Golden Age (англ.). — New York: Издательство Оксфордского университета, 2003. — P. 266. — ISBN 9780199839223.. — «The film’s negative cost was $2.6 million, more than $1 million higher than Snow White's.».
          • Schatz, Thomas. Boom and Bust: American Cinema in the 1940s (англ.). — Издательство Калифорнийского университета, 1999. — Vol. Volume 6 of History of the American Cinema. — P. 466. — ISBN 9780520221307.. — «Boom Town ($4.6 million).».
          • Block & Wilson, 2010, pp. 258–259. «Production Cost: $2.1 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s) … Boom Town was the biggest moneymaker of 1940 and one of the top films of the decade.»
          • Block & Wilson, 2010, p. 267. «With worldwide rentals of $7.8 million in its initial release, the movie made a net profit of over $3 million.»
          • Finler, 2003, p. 301. «The studio did particularly well with its war-related pictures, such as Sergeant York (1941), which cost $1.6 million but was the studio’s biggest hit of the decade aside from This is the Army (1943), the Irving Berlin musical for which the profits were donated to the Army Emergency Relief fund.»
          • Block & Wilson, 2010, p. 281. «Worldwide rentals of $3,449,353 barely recouped the film’s nearly $2 million production cost.»
          • Block & Wilson, 2010, p. 281. «Worldwide rentals of $3,449,353 barely recouped the film’s nearly $2 million production cost.»
          • Glancy, Mark. When Hollywood Loved Britain: The Hollywood 'British' Film 1939–1945 (англ.). — Издательство Манчестерского университета, 1999. — P. 94–95. — ISBN 9780719048531.. — «Mrs Miniver was a phenomenon. It was the most popular film of the year (from any studio) in both North America and Britain, and its foreign earnings were three times higher than those of any other MGM film released in the 1941-42 season. The production cost ($1,344,000) was one of the highest of the season, indicating the studio never thought of the film as a potential loss-maker. When the film earned a worldwide gross of $8,878,000, MGM had the highest profit ($4,831,000) in its history. Random Harvest nearly matched the success of Mrs Miniver with worldwide earnings of $8,147,000 yielding the second-highest profit in MGM’s history ($4,384,000). Random Harvest was also the most popular film of the year in Britain, where it proved to be even more popular than Britain’s most acclaimed war film, In Which We Serve.».
          • Block & Wilson, 2010
            • Миссис Минивер: Burns, Douglas (2010), Mrs. Miniver, p. 279, Mrs. Miniver's galvanizing effect on Americans spawned a record-breaking ten-week run at Radio City Music Hall and garnered a $5.4 million take in domestic rentals (making Mrs. Miniver 1942's top grosser), with a $4.8 million profit on worldwide rentals of $8.9 million.
            • McAdams, Frank (2010), For Whom the Bell Tolls, p. 287, Despite the early furor over the novel being "pro-red and immoral," the film opened to strong and favorable reviews and brought in $11 million in worldwide rentals in its initial release. In: Block & Wilson, 2010.
            • Finler, 2003, pp. 356–363
            • Block & Wilson, 2010, p. 420. «(Unadjusted $s) in Millions of $s — Production Cost: $1.0»
            • Block & Wilson, 2010, p. 420. «(Unadjusted $s) in Millions of $s — Production Cost: $1.0»
            • Schaefer, Eric. "Bold! Daring! Shocking! True!": A History of Exploitation Films, 1919–1959 (англ.). — Издательство университета Дьюка, 1999. — P. 197–199. — ISBN 9780822323747.. — «Leading the pack of postwar sex hygiene films was Mom and Dad (1944), which would become not only the most successful sex hygiene film in history but the biggest pre-1960 exploitation film of any kind. At the end of 1947, the Los Angeles Times reported that Mom and Dad had grossed $2 million. By 1949 Time had estimated that Mom and Dad had taken in $8 million from twenty million moviegoers. And publicity issuing from Mom and Dad's production company indicated that by the end of 1956 it had grossed over $80 million worldwide. Net rentals of around $22 million by 1956 would easily place it in the top ten films of the late 1940s and early 1950s had it appeared on conventional lists. Some estimates have placed its total gross over the years at up to $100 million, and it was still playing drive-in dates into 1975…The film was made for around $65,000 with a crew of Hollywood veterans including director William „One Shot“ Beaudine, cinematographer Marcel LePicard, and a cast that sported old stalwarts Hardie Albright, Francis Ford, and John Hamilton.».
            • Schaefer, Eric. "Bold! Daring! Shocking! True!": A History of Exploitation Films, 1919–1959 (англ.). — Издательство университета Дьюка, 1999. — P. 197–199. — ISBN 9780822323747.. — «Leading the pack of postwar sex hygiene films was Mom and Dad (1944), which would become not only the most successful sex hygiene film in history but the biggest pre-1960 exploitation film of any kind. At the end of 1947, the Los Angeles Times reported that Mom and Dad had grossed $2 million. By 1949 Time had estimated that Mom and Dad had taken in $8 million from twenty million moviegoers. And publicity issuing from Mom and Dad's production company indicated that by the end of 1956 it had grossed over $80 million worldwide. Net rentals of around $22 million by 1956 would easily place it in the top ten films of the late 1940s and early 1950s had it appeared on conventional lists. Some estimates have placed its total gross over the years at up to $100 million, and it was still playing drive-in dates into 1975…The film was made for around $65,000 with a crew of Hollywood veterans including director William „One Shot“ Beaudine, cinematographer Marcel LePicard, and a cast that sported old stalwarts Hardie Albright, Francis Ford, and John Hamilton.».
            • Gabler, Neal. Walt Disney: the biography. — Aurum Press[англ.], 2007. — С. 438.. — «Still, the film wound up grossing $3.3 million…».
            • Burns, Douglas (2010), The Best years of Our Lives, p. 301, The film made a $5 million profit on worldwide rentals of $14.8 million. In: Block & Wilson, 2010.
            • Hall & Neale, 2010, p. 285 (note 6.56). «The cost of Duel in the Sun has been reported as both $5,255,000 (Haver, David O’Selznick’s Hollywood, 361) and $6,480,000 (Thomson, Showman: The Life of David O’Selznick, 472); the latter figure may include distribution expenses. Forever Amber cost $6,375,000 (Solomon, Twentieth Century-Fox: A Corporate and Financial History, 243).»
            • Chopra-Gant, Mike. Hollywood Genres and Post-war America: Masculinity, Family and Nation in Popular Movies and Film Noir (англ.). — I.B. Tauris, 2006. — P. 18. — ISBN 9781850438151.. — «Forever Amber: $8 million; Unconquered: $7.5 million; Life with Father: $6.25 million».
            • Street, Sarah. Transatlantic Crossings: British Feature Films in the United States (англ.). — Continuum International Publishing Group, 2002. — P. 110. — ISBN 9780826413956.. — «Although both films had higher than average budgets (The Red Shoes cost £505,581 and Hamlet cost £572,530, while the average cost of the other thirty films for which Rank supplied information was £233,000), they resulted in high takings at home and abroad.».
            • Work in Progress. — Университет штата Пенсильвания, 2009. — С. 178. — ISBN 9780786885077.. — «Cinderella revived its fortunes. Re-released in February 1950, it cost nearly $3 million to make but earned more than $20 million worldwide.».
            • Barrier, Michael. Hollywood Cartoons: American Animation in Its Golden Age (англ.). — Издательство Оксфордского университета, 2003. — P. 401. — ISBN 9780195167290.. — «It cost around $2.2 million, little more than each of the two package features, Melody Time and The Adventures of Ichabod and Mr. Toad (as Tluo Fabulous Characters had ultimately been named), that just preceded it, but its gross rentals—an amount shared by Disney and RKO—were $7.8 million, almost twice as much as the two package features combined.».
            • Zone, Ray. 3-D Revolution: The History of Modern Stereoscopic Cinema (англ.). — Издательство Кентуккийского университета, 2012. — P. 71. — ISBN 9780813136110.. — «Produced at a cost of $1 million, This is Cinerama ran 122 weeks, earning $4.7 million in its initial New York run alone and eventually grossed over $32 million. It was obvious to Hollywood that the public was ready for a new form of motion picture entertainment. The first five Cinerama feature-length travelogues, though they only played in twenty-two theaters, pulled in a combined gross of $82 million.».
            • Burns, Douglas (2010), The Greatest Show on Earth, pp. 354–355, By May 1953, Variety was reporting that the Best Picture winner had amassed $18.35 million in worldwide rentals. In: Block & Wilson, 2010.
            • Hall & Neale, 2010, p. 147–148. «To take full advantage of CinemaScope’s panoramic possibilities, shooting was delayed for the sets to be redesigned and rebuilt, adding $500,000 to the eventual $4.1 million budget…It ultimately returned domestic rentals of $17.5 million and $25 million worldwide, placing it second only to Gone with the Wind in Varietýs annually updated chart.»
            • Block & Wilson, 2010, p. 367. «It brought in $16.7 million in domestic rentals, $9.4 million in foreign rentals, and made a net profit of $8.1 million.»
            • Block & Wilson, 2010, p. 420. «Domestic Box Office: $19.6 million; Production Cost: $3.8 million.»
            • Hall & Neale, 2010, p. 149. «VistaVision was first used for the musical White Christmas (1954), which Variety named the top grosser of its year with anticipated domestic rentals of $12 million.»
            • Block & Wilson, 2010, p. 327. «Production cost: $13.3 million; Domestic Film Rental: $31.3; Foreign Film Rental: $23.9; Worldwide Box office (estimated): $122.7 (Initial Release — Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s).»
            • Block & Wilson, 2010, p. 327. «Production cost: $13.3 million; Domestic Film Rental: $31.3; Foreign Film Rental: $23.9; Worldwide Box office (estimated): $122.7 (Initial Release — Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s).»
            • Hall & Neale, 2010, p. 153. «South Pacific also became for a time the most successful film ever released in the United Kingdom, where it earned a box-office gross three times its negative cost of $5,610,000. Anticipated global rentals after three years were $30 million.»
            • Block & Wilson, 2010, p. 324. «Worldwide box office: $146.9 million; Worldwide rentals: $66.1 million; Production cost: $15.9 million. (Initial Release — Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)»
            • Reid, John Howard. America's Best, Britain's Finest: A Survey of Mixed Movies (англ.). — Lulu, 2006. — Vol. Volume 14 of Hollywood classics. — P. 243–245. — ISBN 9781411678774.. — «Negative cost: around $4 million; Worldwide film rentals gross (including 1968 American reissue) to 1970: $30 million.».
            • Webster, Patrick. Love and Death in Kubrick: A Critical Study of the Films from Lolita Through Eyes Wide Shut (англ.). — McFarland & Company, 2010. — P. 298 (note 2.23). — ISBN 9780786459162.. — «Spartacus cost $12 million and grossed some $60 million at the box office, figures Kubrick rarely again matched.».
            • Webster, Patrick. Love and Death in Kubrick: A Critical Study of the Films from Lolita Through Eyes Wide Shut (англ.). — McFarland & Company, 2010. — P. 298 (note 2.23). — ISBN 9780786459162.. — «Spartacus cost $12 million and grossed some $60 million at the box office, figures Kubrick rarely again matched.».
            • Block, Hayley Taylor (2010), West Side Story, p. 449, With its three rereleases, it took in over $105 million in worldwide box office ($720 million in 2005 dollars). In: Block & Wilson, 2010.
            • Block, Hayley Taylor (2010), West Side Story, p. 449, With its three rereleases, it took in over $105 million in worldwide box office ($720 million in 2005 dollars). In: Block & Wilson, 2010.
            • Hall & Neale, 2010, p. 164. «West cost $14,483,000; although it earned $35 million worldwide in just under three years, with ultimate domestic rentals totaling $20,932,883, high distribution costs severely limited its profitability.»
            • Hall & Neale, 2010, p. 164. «West cost $14,483,000; although it earned $35 million worldwide in just under three years, with ultimate domestic rentals totaling $20,932,883, high distribution costs severely limited its profitability.»
            • Burns, Douglas (2010), Mary Poppins, p. 469, In its initial run, Poppins garnered an astounding $44 million in worldwide rentals and became the company's first Best Picture Oscar contender. In: Block & Wilson, 2010.
            • Hall & Neale, 2010, p. 188. «The negative cost of Warners' adaptation of Edward Albee’s play Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? (1966)—filmed in widescreen and black-and-white, largely set in domestic interiors and with a cast of only four principal actors—amounted to $7,613,000, in part because stars Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton received up-front fees of $1 million and $750,000 respectively, against 10 percent of the gross apiece. (Their participation was presumably added to the budget).»
            • Welles, Chris (7 сентября 1970). Behind the Silence at Columbia Pictures—No Moguls, No Minions, Just Profits. New York (magazine). Vol. 3, no. 36. New York Media. pp. 42–47. While Columbia, battling Ray Stark over every dollar, did Funny Girl for around $8.8 million, a million or so over budget, Fox spent nearly $24 million on Hello, Dolly!, more than twice the initial budget, and the film will thus have to gross three times as much to break even.
            • Крёстный отец
              • 1974: Newsweek. — 1974. — Т. 84. — С. 74.
              • Jacobs, Diane. Hollywood Renaissance. — Dell Publishing[англ.], 1980. — С. 115. — ISBN 9780440533825.. — «The Godfather catapulted Coppola to overnight celebrity, earning three Academy Awards and a then record-breaking $142 million in worldwide sales.».
              • The media environment: mass communications in American society (англ.). — Hastings House, 1976. — P. 76. — ISBN 9780803846814.. — «…further reflected by the phenomenal successes of The Sting, Chinatown and The Exorcist. The latter film, which cost about $10 million to produce, has grossed over $110 million worldwide.».
              • New York, vol. 8, New York Media, 1975, ...Jaws should outstrip another MCA hit, The Sting, which had world-wide revenues of $115 million. (Online copy at Google Books) {{citation}}: Внешняя ссылка в |quote= (справка)
              • Block & Wilson, 2010, p. 560. «Production Cost: $5.5 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s).»
              • Hall & Neale, 2010, pp. 206–208. «The most successful entry in the disaster cycle was the $15 million The Towering Inferno which earned over $48,650,000 in domestic rentals and about $40 million foreign.»
              • Brooks, Mel. My Movies: The Collisions of Art and Money // The movie business book / Squire, Jason E.. — 3. — Simon & Schuster, 2004. — ISBN 978-0-7432-1937-2.. — «To their credit, Blazing saddles, opened wide in June to tremendous business around the country. It’s done over $80 million in rentals worldwide in 1974 dollars. (Online copy at Google Books)».
              • Block & Wilson, 2010, p. 564. «Production Cost: $2.6 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s).»
              • Priggé, Steven. Movie Moguls Speak: Interviews With Top Film Producers (англ.). — McFarland & Company, 2004. — P. 8. — ISBN 9780786419296.. — «The budget for the first Jaws was $4 million and the picture wound up costing $9 million.».
              • Hall & Neale, 2010, p. 214. «Rocky was the „sleeper of the decade“. Produced by UA and costing just under $1 million, it went on to earn a box-office gross of $117,235,247 in the United States and $225 million worldwide.»
              • Block, Alex Ben (2010), Rocky, p. 583, The budget was $1,075,000 plus producer's fees of $100,000. In: Block & Wilson, 2010.
              • Hall & Neale, 2010, p. 218. «Eventually costing $11,293,151, Star Wars was previewed at the Northpoint Theatre in San Francisco on May 1, 1977.»
              • Hofler, Robert. Party Animals: A Hollywood Tale of Sex, Drugs, and Rock 'N' Roll Starring the Fabulous Allan Carr (англ.). — ReadHowYouWant.com, 2010. — P. 145. — ISBN 9781459600072.. — «Despite the fact that Grease was well on its way to becoming the highest-grossing movie musical in the world, and eventually grossed over $341 million…».
              • McAdams, Frank (2010), Лучший стрелок, pp. 678–679, Бюджет: 19 млн In: Block & Wilson, 2010.
              • Block & Wilson, 2010, pp. 694–695. «Production Cost: $55.4 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s) … The film went on to haul in over $494 million worldwide.»
              • Block & Wilson, 2010, p. 509. «Production Cost: $140.0 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s).»
              • The Atlantic Monthly. — 1973. — Т. 231. — С. 2.. — «As of the end of 1971, GWTW stood as the all-time money-drawing movie, with a take of $116 million, and, with this year’s reissues, it should continue to run ahead of the second place contender and all-time kaffee-mit-schlag spectacle.».
              • New Times. — 1974. — Т. 2.. — «Coppola is King Midas, the most individually powerful U.S. filmmaker .» His credits include directing the first Godfather (worldwide earnings: $142 million, ahead of Gone with the Wind, The Sound of Music and The Exorcist)…(Online copy at Google Books)".
              • Dick, Bernard F. City of Dreams: The Making and Remaking of Universal Pictures (англ.). — Издательство Кентуккийского университета, 1997. — P. 168. — ISBN 9780813120164.. — «Jaws (1975) saved the day, grossing $104 million domestically and $132 million worldwide by January 1976.».

              news.google.co.uk

guinnessworldrecords.com

hollywoodreporter.com

imf.org

latimes.com

articles.latimes.com

mandilaw.com

maoyan.com

piaofang.maoyan.com

marketwatch.com

measuringworth.com

news.google.com

newsbank.com

nl.newsbank.com

newsweek.com

nytimes.com

nytimes.com

economix.blogs.nytimes.com

select.nytimes.com

  • Harmetz, Aljean (18 мая 1980). The Saga Beyond 'Star Wars'. The New York Times. Архивировано 20 мая 2013. Дата обращения: 30 января 2012. "Star Wars" has brought 20th Century-Fox approximately $250 million in film rentals ... "Star Wars" grossed $410 million, and his share was enough to allow him to finance its sequel, "The Empire Strikes Back," himself.

pqarchiver.com

pqasb.pqarchiver.com

slate.com

suntimes.com

rogerebert.suntimes.com

tcm.com

telegraph.co.uk

the-numbers.com

theguardian.com

thewrap.com

time.com

turner.com

tcm.turner.com

usi.edu

  • Wayback Machine (англ.). web.archive.org (29 октября 2013). Дата обращения: 17 декабря 2018. Архивировано из оригинала 29 октября 2013 года.

variety.com

washingtonpost.com

web.archive.org

webcitation.org

wikipedia.org

en.wikipedia.org

worldcat.org

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

  • May, Richard P. (Fall 2005), Restoring The Big Parade, The Moving Image, 5 (2): 140–146, doi:10.1353/mov.2005.0033, ISSN 1532-3978, ...earning somewhere between $18 and $22 million, depending on the figures consulted

wsj.com

blogs.wsj.com

wsj.com