Телепатия (Russian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Телепатия" in Russian language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Russian rank
1st place
1st place
24th place
2nd place
low place
low place
2nd place
3rd place
3rd place
10th place
low place
low place
1,580th place
1,271st place
4th place
6th place
462nd place
836th place
3,828th place
3,449th place
27th place
4th place
low place
low place
low place
897th place
low place
low place
3,553rd place
5,560th place
low place
1,401st place
low place
8,115th place
878th place
60th place
3,847th place
367th place
1,220th place
1,236th place
6th place
9th place
4,757th place
3,071st place
low place
low place
8th place
30th place
low place
4,787th place
low place
low place
234th place
157th place

answers.com (Global: 1,580th place; Russian: 1,271st place)

apa.org (Global: 1,220th place; Russian: 1,236th place)

doi.apa.org

  • Etzel Cardeña, Lund University, American Psychologist, American Psychological Association (APA). APA PsycNet (англ.). doi.apa.org. American Psychological Association (APA) (2018-24-05). Дата обращения: 24 октября 2021. Архивировано 24 октября 2021 года.

archive.org (Global: 6th place; Russian: 9th place)

bbc.co.uk (Global: 8th place; Russian: 30th place)

news.bbc.co.uk

betterhumans.com (Global: low place; Russian: low place)

archives.betterhumans.com

books.google.com (Global: 3rd place; Russian: 10th place)

  • Jan Dalkvist. Telepathic Group Communication of Emotions as a Function of Belief in Telepathy. — Dept. of Psychology, Stockholm University, 1994. — «Within the scientific community however, the claim that psi anomalies exist or may exist is in general regarded with skepticism. One reason for this difference between the scientist and the non scientist is that the former relies on his own experiences and anecdotal reports of psi phenomena, whereas the scientist at least officially requires replicable results from well controlled experiments to believe in such phenomena - results which according to the prevailing view among scientists, do not exist.».
  • Willem B. Drees. Religion, Science and Naturalism. — Cambridge University Press, 1998-11-28. — P. 242–. — «Let me take the example of claims in parapsychology regarding telepathy across spatial or temporal distances, apparently without a mediating physical process. Such claims are at odds with the scientific consensus.». — ISBN 978-0-521-64562-1.
  • Oliver Lodge. Survival of Man: A Study in Unrecognized Human Faculty. books.google.com. Дата обращения: 6 января 2010.

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; Russian: 3rd place)

dx.doi.org

  • Thomas Rabeyron. Why Most Research Findings About Psi Are False: The Replicability Crisis, the Psi Paradox and the Myth of Sisyphus // Front Psychol. — 2020. — Vol. 11. — P. 562992. — doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.562992. — PMID 33041926. — PMC 7530246.

    Nevertheless, these «demonstration studies» might even be more complicated if we also take into account that psi effects tend to disappear when the same experiment is replicated, which is described as the elusive nature of psi (Hansen, 2001; Kennedy, 2003).

  • Marija Branković. Who Believes in ESP: Cognitive and Motivational Determinants of the Belief in Extra-Sensory Perception : [англ.] // Eur J Psychol. — 2019. — Vol. 15, no. 1. — P. 120–139. — doi:10.5964/ejop.v15i1.1689. — PMID 30915177. — PMC 6396695.

    ESP or «psi» refers to extra-sensory perception, i.e. phenomena as telepathy (communicating with thoughts), psychokinesis (the ability to move objects without physical contact), precognition (the ability to predict future events), psychometry (reading the past from an object) or dowsing (the ability to locate underground water, buried metals and gravesites using dowsing rod). The common denominator for all the phenomena in question is that they break the fundamental scientific principles known to date (Broad, 1953). … Since they failed to stand numerous scientific tests (e.g. Enright, 1995) these phenomena are thus considered pseudoscientific or, as other authors prefer to term this «…not empirically attested to the satisfaction of the scientific establishment.» (Irwin, 2009, p. 16).

  • Miguel Pais-Vieira, Mikhail Lebedev, Carolina Kunicki, Jing Wang & Miguel A. L. Nicolelis. A Brain-to-Brain Interface for Real-Time Sharing of Sensorimotor Information (англ.) // Scientific Reports. — 2013. — Vol. 3. — P. Article number: 1319. — doi:10.1038/srep01319. Архивировано 17 января 2026 года.

doi.org

encyclopedia.com (Global: 462nd place; Russian: 836th place)

enotes.com (Global: 3,553rd place; Russian: 5,560th place)

  • SOPHIE DE MIJOLLA-MELLOR. Telepathy. Psychoanalysis Dictionary. Дата обращения: 15 января 2010. Архивировано 2 июня 2012 года.The process of telepathy is said to occur when a psychic act by one person results in the same psychic act in another person. — S. Freud

extrasensory-perceptions-guide.com (Global: low place; Russian: low place)

  • Learn telepathy. www.extrasensory-perceptions-guide.com. Дата обращения: 6 января 2010. Архивировано из оригинала 27 декабря 2009 года.

nature.com (Global: 234th place; Russian: 157th place)

nih.gov (Global: 4th place; Russian: 6th place)

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

  • Thomas Rabeyron. Why Most Research Findings About Psi Are False: The Replicability Crisis, the Psi Paradox and the Myth of Sisyphus // Front Psychol. — 2020. — Vol. 11. — P. 562992. — doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.562992. — PMID 33041926. — PMC 7530246.

    Nevertheless, these «demonstration studies» might even be more complicated if we also take into account that psi effects tend to disappear when the same experiment is replicated, which is described as the elusive nature of psi (Hansen, 2001; Kennedy, 2003).

  • Marija Branković. Who Believes in ESP: Cognitive and Motivational Determinants of the Belief in Extra-Sensory Perception : [англ.] // Eur J Psychol. — 2019. — Vol. 15, no. 1. — P. 120–139. — doi:10.5964/ejop.v15i1.1689. — PMID 30915177. — PMC 6396695.

    ESP or «psi» refers to extra-sensory perception, i.e. phenomena as telepathy (communicating with thoughts), psychokinesis (the ability to move objects without physical contact), precognition (the ability to predict future events), psychometry (reading the past from an object) or dowsing (the ability to locate underground water, buried metals and gravesites using dowsing rod). The common denominator for all the phenomena in question is that they break the fundamental scientific principles known to date (Broad, 1953). … Since they failed to stand numerous scientific tests (e.g. Enright, 1995) these phenomena are thus considered pseudoscientific or, as other authors prefer to term this «…not empirically attested to the satisfaction of the scientific establishment.» (Irwin, 2009, p. 16).

nm1925.ru (Global: low place; Russian: 8,115th place)

nsf.gov (Global: 3,828th place; Russian: 3,449th place)

  • National Science Board[англ.]. Chapter 7: Science and Technology: Public Attitudes and Understanding. Science and Engineering Indicators 2006. National Science Foundation (2006). Дата обращения: 3 сентября 2010. Архивировано 22 августа 2011 года.

    «…[A]bout three-fourths of Americans hold at least one pseudoscientific belief; i.e., they believed in at least 1 of the 10 survey items… [29] Those 10 items were extrasensory perception (ESP), that houses can be haunted, ghosts/that spirits of dead people can come back in certain places/situations, telepathy/communication between minds without using traditional senses, clairvoyance/the power of the mind to know the past and predict the future, astrology/that the position of the stars and planets can affect people’s lives, that people can communicate mentally with someone who has died, witches, reincarnation/the rebirth of the soul in a new body after death, and channeling/allowing a „spirit-being“ to temporarily assume control of a body.»

parapsych.org (Global: low place; Russian: low place)

psylib.org.ua (Global: low place; Russian: 897th place)

publicpost.ru (Global: low place; Russian: low place)

ras.ru (Global: 3,847th place; Russian: 367th place)

rutv.ru (Global: low place; Russian: 1,401st place)

singingtotheplants.com (Global: low place; Russian: low place)

skepdic.com (Global: 4,757th place; Russian: 3,071st place)

strf.ru (Global: low place; Russian: 4,787th place)

survivalafterdeath.org.uk (Global: low place; Russian: low place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; Russian: 1st place)

webcitation.org (Global: 24th place; Russian: 2nd place)

wikipedia.org (Global: low place; Russian: low place)

en.wikipedia.org

  • National Science Board[англ.]. Chapter 7: Science and Technology: Public Attitudes and Understanding. Science and Engineering Indicators 2006. National Science Foundation (2006). Дата обращения: 3 сентября 2010. Архивировано 22 августа 2011 года.

    «…[A]bout three-fourths of Americans hold at least one pseudoscientific belief; i.e., they believed in at least 1 of the 10 survey items… [29] Those 10 items were extrasensory perception (ESP), that houses can be haunted, ghosts/that spirits of dead people can come back in certain places/situations, telepathy/communication between minds without using traditional senses, clairvoyance/the power of the mind to know the past and predict the future, astrology/that the position of the stars and planets can affect people’s lives, that people can communicate mentally with someone who has died, witches, reincarnation/the rebirth of the soul in a new body after death, and channeling/allowing a „spirit-being“ to temporarily assume control of a body.»

  • Terence Hines. (2003). Pseudoscience and the Paranormal. Prometheus Books. p. 144. ISBN 978-1573929790 «It is important to realize that, in one hundred years of parapsychological investigations, there has never been a single adequate demonstration of the reality of any psi phenomenon.»
  • Massimo Pigliucci, Maarten Boudry. (2013). Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. University Of Chicago Press p. 158. ISBN 978-0226051963 «Many observers refer to the field as a „pseudoscience“. When mainstream scientists say that the field of parapsychology is not scientific, they mean that no satisfying naturalistic cause-and-effect explanation for these supposed effects has yet been proposed and that the field’s experiments cannot be consistently replicated.»
  • John Taylor. (1980). Science and the Supernatural: An Investigation of Paranormal Phenomena Including Psychic Healing, Clairvoyance, Telepathy, and Precognition by a Distinguished Physicist and Mathematician. Temple Smith. p. 84. ISBN 0-85117-191-5.
  • Sutherland, Stuart. (1994). Irrationality: The Enemy Within. p. 314. Penguin Books. ISBN 0-14-016726-9
  • Graham Reed. (1988). The Psychology of Anomalous Experience. Prometheus Books. pp. 38-42. ISBN 0-87975-435-4
  • Ian Rowland. (1998). The Full Facts Book of Cold Reading. Ian Rowland Limited: 4th Revised edition. ISBN 978-0955847608

wikisource.org (Global: 27th place; Russian: 4th place)

ru.wikisource.org

yandex.ru (Global: 878th place; Russian: 60th place)

zen.yandex.ru