Rubinstein, S. M. Spinal manipulative therapy for acute low back pain : an update of the cochrane review : [англ.] / S. M. Rubinstein, C. B. Terwee, W. J. Assendelft … [et al.] // Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. — 2013. — Vol. 38, no. 3 (February). — P. E158-177. — doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008880.pub2. — PMID22972127. — PMC6885055.
Rubinstein, S. M. Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low-back pain : [англ.] / S. M. Rubinstein, M. van Middelkoop, W. J. J. Assendelft … [et al.] // Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. — 2011. — Vol. 16, no. 2. — Art. no. CD008112. — doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008112.pub2. — PMID21328304.
How Chiropractors Think and Practice: The Survey of North American Chiropractors / McDonald W. P., Durkin K. F., Pfefer M. et al. — Ada, OH: Institute for Social Research, Ohio Northern University, 2003. — ISBN 0-9728055-5-9. Summarized in:
McDonald W. P., Durkin K. F., Pfefer M. How chiropractors think and practice: the survey of North American chiropractors // Semin Integr Med. — 2004. — Т. 2, № 3. — С. 92—98. — doi:10.1016/j.sigm.2004.07.002.
Keating J. C., Charlton K. H., Grod J. P., Perle S. M., Sikorski D., Winterstein J. F. Subluxation: dogma or science? // Chiropr Osteopat. — August 2005. — Т. 13, № 17. — doi:10.1186/1746-1340-13-17. — PMID16092955.
Rubinstein, S. M. Spinal manipulative therapy for acute low back pain : an update of the cochrane review : [англ.] / S. M. Rubinstein, C. B. Terwee, W. J. Assendelft … [et al.] // Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. — 2013. — Vol. 38, no. 3 (February). — P. E158-177. — doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008880.pub2. — PMID22972127. — PMC6885055.
Rubinstein, S. M. Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low-back pain : [англ.] / S. M. Rubinstein, M. van Middelkoop, W. J. J. Assendelft … [et al.] // Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. — 2011. — Vol. 16, no. 2. — Art. no. CD008112. — doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008112.pub2. — PMID21328304.
Keating J. C., Charlton K. H., Grod J. P., Perle S. M., Sikorski D., Winterstein J. F. Subluxation: dogma or science? // Chiropr Osteopat. — August 2005. — Т. 13, № 17. — doi:10.1186/1746-1340-13-17. — PMID16092955.
philosophyofchiropractic.com
Keating J. C. Jr, Cleveland C. S. III, Menke M.Chiropractic history: a primer (неопр.) (PDF). Association for the History of Chiropractic (2005). — «A significant and continuing barrier to scientific progress within chiropractic are the anti-scientific and pseudo-scientific ideas (Keating 1997b) which have sustained the profession throughout a century of intense struggle with political medicine. Chiropractors' tendency to assert the meaningfulness of various theories and methods as a counterpoint to allopathic charges of quackery has created a defensiveness which can make critical examination of chiropractic concepts difficult (Keating and Mootz 1989). One example of this conundrum is the continuing controversy about the presumptive target of DCs' adjustive interventions: subluxation (Gatterman 1995; Leach 1994).» Дата обращения: 16 июня 2008. Архивировано 25 июня 2008 года.
Keating J. C. Jr, Cleveland C. S. III, Menke M.Chiropractic history: a primer (неопр.) (PDF). // Association for the History of Chiropractic (2005). Дата обращения: 16 июня 2008. Архивировано из оригинала 25 июня 2008 года.
Keating J. C. Jr, Cleveland C. S. III, Menke M.Chiropractic history: a primer (неопр.) (PDF). Association for the History of Chiropractic (2005). — «A significant and continuing barrier to scientific progress within chiropractic are the anti-scientific and pseudo-scientific ideas (Keating 1997b) which have sustained the profession throughout a century of intense struggle with political medicine. Chiropractors' tendency to assert the meaningfulness of various theories and methods as a counterpoint to allopathic charges of quackery has created a defensiveness which can make critical examination of chiropractic concepts difficult (Keating and Mootz 1989). One example of this conundrum is the continuing controversy about the presumptive target of DCs' adjustive interventions: subluxation (Gatterman 1995; Leach 1994).» Дата обращения: 16 июня 2008. Архивировано 25 июня 2008 года.
Keating J. C. Jr, Cleveland C. S. III, Menke M.Chiropractic history: a primer (неопр.) (PDF). // Association for the History of Chiropractic (2005). Дата обращения: 16 июня 2008. Архивировано из оригинала 25 июня 2008 года.
Keating J. C. Jr, Cleveland C. S. III, Menke M.Chiropractic history: a primer (неопр.) (PDF). Association for the History of Chiropractic (2005). — «A significant and continuing barrier to scientific progress within chiropractic are the anti-scientific and pseudo-scientific ideas (Keating 1997b) which have sustained the profession throughout a century of intense struggle with political medicine. Chiropractors' tendency to assert the meaningfulness of various theories and methods as a counterpoint to allopathic charges of quackery has created a defensiveness which can make critical examination of chiropractic concepts difficult (Keating and Mootz 1989). One example of this conundrum is the continuing controversy about the presumptive target of DCs' adjustive interventions: subluxation (Gatterman 1995; Leach 1994).» Дата обращения: 16 июня 2008. Архивировано 25 июня 2008 года.
Оффит, П. Гл. 7. Прошлое как пролог. // Смертельно опасный выбор : Чем борьба с прививками грозит нам всем = Deadly Choices: How the Anti-Vaccine Movement Threatens Us All / Пер. с англ.: Анастасия Бродоцкая. — М. : Corpus, 2017. — 368 с. — (Библиотека фонда «Эволюция»). — ISBN 978-5-17-100522-1.
