Genome (Simple English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Genome" in Simple English language version.

Last modified:

Ref.Un. Ref.Website
Global rank Simple English rank
5th place
5th place
2nd place
2nd place
14th place
17th place
6th place
3rd place
15th place
11th place
1,019th place
248th place
1st place
1st place

adsabs.harvard.edu (Global: 14th place; Simple English: 17th place)

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

archive.org (Global: 6th place; Simple English: 3rd place)

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; Simple English: 2nd place)

nih.gov (Global: 5th place; Simple English: 5th place)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

lhncbc.nlm.nih.gov

  • Hans Winkler, Professor of Botany at the University of Hamburg, Germany, as a combination of the words gene and chromosome.Joshua Lederberg and Alexa T. McCray (2001). "'Ome Sweet 'Omics -- A genealogical treasury of words". The Scientist. 15 (7).
    An online copy is available here: Archived 2006-09-29 at the Wayback Machine

sciencemag.org (Global: 1,019th place; Simple English: 248th place)

sciencemag.org

news.sciencemag.org

  • ScienceShot: biggest genome ever Archived 2010-10-11 at the Wayback Machine, comments: "The measurement for Amoeba dubia and other protozoa, which were reported to have very large genomes, were made in the 1960s using a rough biochemical approach which is now considered to be an unreliable method for accurate genome size determinations".

semanticscholar.org (Global: 15th place; Simple English: 11th place)

api.semanticscholar.org

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; Simple English: 1st place)

  • Hans Winkler, Professor of Botany at the University of Hamburg, Germany, as a combination of the words gene and chromosome.Joshua Lederberg and Alexa T. McCray (2001). "'Ome Sweet 'Omics -- A genealogical treasury of words". The Scientist. 15 (7).
    An online copy is available here: Archived 2006-09-29 at the Wayback Machine
  • ScienceShot: biggest genome ever Archived 2010-10-11 at the Wayback Machine, comments: "The measurement for Amoeba dubia and other protozoa, which were reported to have very large genomes, were made in the 1960s using a rough biochemical approach which is now considered to be an unreliable method for accurate genome size determinations".