Sovjetska lakota 1932–1933 (Slovenian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Sovjetska lakota 1932–1933" in Slovenian language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Slovenian rank
3rd place
11th place
2nd place
5th place
1st place
2nd place
6th place
9th place
low place
7,283rd place
11th place
51st place
807th place
3,438th place
120th place
191st place
7th place
37th place
6,956th place
7,560th place
548th place
4,693rd place
5th place
10th place
low place
7,438th place
215th place
674th place
low place
low place
12th place
44th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
3,000th place
low place
163rd place
110th place
low place
low place
32nd place
472nd place
93rd place
1,105th place
low place
low place
97th place
56th place
40th place
16th place

archive.org

books.google.com

britannica.com

demoscope.ru

doi.org

  • Wheatcroft, Stephen G. (Avgust 2018). »The Turn Away from Economic Explanations for Soviet Famines«. Contemporary European History. Cambridge University Press. 27 (3): 465–469. doi:10.1017/S0960777318000358. Pridobljeno 26. novembra 2021 – prek ResearchGate.
  • Davies, Robert W.; Wheatcroft, Stephen G. (2009). The Years of Hunger: Soviet Agriculture 1931–1933. Palgrave Macmillan. str. 415. doi:10.1057/9780230273979. ISBN 9780230238558.
  • Rosefielde, Steven (september 1996). »Stalinism in Post-Communist Perspective: New Evidence on Killings, Forced Labour and Economic Growth in the 1930s«. Europe-Asia Studies. 48 (6): 959–987. doi:10.1080/09668139608412393.{{navedi časopis}}: Vzdrževanje CS1: samodejni prevod datuma (povezava)
  • Wolowyna, Oleh (Oktober 2020). »A Demographic Framework for the 1932–1934 Famine in the Soviet Union«. Journal of Genocide Research. 23 (4): 501–526. doi:10.1080/14623528.2020.1834741.
  • Suslov, Andrei (Julij 2019). »'Dekulakization' as a Facet of Stalin's Social Revolution (The Case of Perm Region)«. The Russian Review. 78 (3): 371–391. doi:10.1111/russ.12236. ISSN 1467-9434. Pridobljeno 21. novembra 2021 – prek ResearchGate.
  • Ellman, Michael (Junij 2007). »Stalin and the Soviet famine of 1932–33 Revisited« (PDF). Europe-Asia Studies. Routledge. 59 (4): 663–693. doi:10.1080/09668130701291899. S2CID 53655536. Arhivirano iz spletišča dne 14. oktobra 2007. Napaka pri navajanju: Neveljavna oznaka <ref>; sklici, poimenovani Ellman 2007, so definirani večkrat z različno vsebino (glej stran pomoči).
  • Marples, David R. (Maj 2009). »Ethnic Issues in the Famine of 1932–1933 in Ukraine«. Europe-Asia Studies. 61 (3): 505–518 [507]. doi:10.1080/09668130902753325. S2CID 67783643. Geoffrey A. Hosking concluded that: Conquest's research establishes beyond doubt, however, that the famine was deliberately inflicted there [in Ukraine] for ethnic reasons...Craig Whitney, however, disagreed with the theory of genocide
  • Ellman, Michael (Junij 2007). »Stalin and the Soviet famine of 1932–1933 Revisited« (PDF). Europe-Asia Studies. Routledge. 59 (4): 663–693. doi:10.1080/09668130701291899. S2CID 53655536. Arhivirano iz spletišča dne 14. oktobra 2007.

fakty.ua

garethjones.org

ghostarchive.org

google.com

google.it

  • Fitzpatrick, Sheila (2000). »The Party Is Always Right«. Everyday Stalinism: Ordinary Life in Extraordinary Times: Soviet Russia in the 1930s (paperback izd.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. str. 22. ISBN 9780195050011. The Soviet regime was adept at creating its own enemies, whom it then suspected of conspiracy against the state. It did so first by declaring that all members of certain social classes and estates—primarily former nobles, members of the bourgeoisie, priests, and kulaks—were by definition 'class enemies,' resentful of their loss of privilege and likely to engage in counterrevolutionary conspiracy to recover them. The next step, taken at the end of the 1920s, was the 'liquidation as a class' of certain categories of class enemies, notably kulaks and, to a lesser extent, Nepmen and priests. This meant that the victims were expropriated, deprived of the possibility of continuing their previous way of earning a living, and often arrested and exiled.

harrimaninstitute.org

holodomoreducation.org

indiewire.com

blogs.indiewire.com

khpg.org

nsc.ru

philosophy.nsc.ru

nytimes.com

archive.nytimes.com

  • Fitzpatrick, Sheila (2000). »The Party Is Always Right«. Everyday Stalinism: Ordinary Life in Extraordinary Times: Soviet Russia in the 1930s (paperback izd.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. str. 22. ISBN 9780195050011. The Soviet regime was adept at creating its own enemies, whom it then suspected of conspiracy against the state. It did so first by declaring that all members of certain social classes and estates—primarily former nobles, members of the bourgeoisie, priests, and kulaks—were by definition 'class enemies,' resentful of their loss of privilege and likely to engage in counterrevolutionary conspiracy to recover them. The next step, taken at the end of the 1920s, was the 'liquidation as a class' of certain categories of class enemies, notably kulaks and, to a lesser extent, Nepmen and priests. This meant that the victims were expropriated, deprived of the possibility of continuing their previous way of earning a living, and often arrested and exiled.

nytimes.com

paulbogdanor.com

researchgate.net

  • Wheatcroft, Stephen G. (Avgust 2018). »The Turn Away from Economic Explanations for Soviet Famines«. Contemporary European History. Cambridge University Press. 27 (3): 465–469. doi:10.1017/S0960777318000358. Pridobljeno 26. novembra 2021 – prek ResearchGate.
  • Suslov, Andrei (Julij 2019). »'Dekulakization' as a Facet of Stalin's Social Revolution (The Case of Perm Region)«. The Russian Review. 78 (3): 371–391. doi:10.1111/russ.12236. ISSN 1467-9434. Pridobljeno 21. novembra 2021 – prek ResearchGate.

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

the-american-interest.com

theguardian.com

ukemonde.com

un.org

  • »Analysis Framework« (PDF). Office of the Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide. United Nations. Pridobljeno 14. novembra 2021.

walesonline.co.uk

web.archive.org

worldcat.org