Zanesljivost Wikipedije (Slovenian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Zanesljivost Wikipedije" in Slovenian language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Slovenian rank

4web.archive.org

1^st place

2^nd place

1vice.com

175^th place

1,745^th place

1theatlantic.com

228^th place

511^th place

1nytimes.com

7^th place

37^th place

1mit.edu

415^th place

355^th place

1wikipedia.org

low place

1ibm.com

1,131^st place

920^th place

1hbs.edu

4,520^th place

8,491^st place

1slate.com

259^th place

797^th place

1independent.co.uk

36^th place

119^th place

1britannica.com

40^th place

16^th place

1doi.org

2^nd place

5^th place

1harvard.edu

18^th place

31^st place

1nih.gov

4^th place

8^th place

1bbc.co.uk

8^th place

25^th place

bbc.co.uk

news.bbc.co.uk

Giles, J. (2005). »Internet encyclopaedias go head to head: Jimmy Wales' Wikipedia comes close to Britannica in terms of the accuracy of its science entries«. Nature. 438 (7070): 900–1. Bibcode:2005Natur.438..900G. doi:10.1038/438900a. PMID 16355180. The study (which was not in itself peer-reviewed) was cited in many news articles such as this: »Wikipedia survives research test«. BBC News. BBC. 15. december 2005. Arhivirano iz spletišča dne 7. avgusta 2012. Pridobljeno 18. julija 2006.

britannica.com

corporate.britannica.com

Fatally Flawed: Refuting the recent study on encyclopedic accuracy by the journal Nature Arhivirano July 9, 2016, na Wayback Machine. Encyclopædia Britannica, March 2006

doi.org

Giles, J. (2005). »Internet encyclopaedias go head to head: Jimmy Wales' Wikipedia comes close to Britannica in terms of the accuracy of its science entries«. Nature. 438 (7070): 900–1. Bibcode:2005Natur.438..900G. doi:10.1038/438900a. PMID 16355180. The study (which was not in itself peer-reviewed) was cited in many news articles such as this: »Wikipedia survives research test«. BBC News. BBC. 15. december 2005. Arhivirano iz spletišča dne 7. avgusta 2012. Pridobljeno 18. julija 2006.

harvard.edu

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

Giles, J. (2005). »Internet encyclopaedias go head to head: Jimmy Wales' Wikipedia comes close to Britannica in terms of the accuracy of its science entries«. Nature. 438 (7070): 900–1. Bibcode:2005Natur.438..900G. doi:10.1038/438900a. PMID 16355180. The study (which was not in itself peer-reviewed) was cited in many news articles such as this: »Wikipedia survives research test«. BBC News. BBC. 15. december 2005. Arhivirano iz spletišča dne 7. avgusta 2012. Pridobljeno 18. julija 2006.

hbs.edu

»Is Wikipedia Biased?«. American Economic Review. 1. januar 2012.

ibm.com

research.ibm.com

history flow: results Arhivirano April 2, 2015, na Wayback Machine. IBM Collaborative User Experience Research Group, 2003

independent.co.uk

»Can we trust Wikipedia? 1.4 billion people can't be wrong«.

mit.edu

alumni.media.mit.edu

Fernanda B. Viégas, Martin Wattenberg, Kushal Dave: Studying Cooperation and Conflict between Authors with history flow Visualizations Arhivirano January 25, 2006, na Wayback Machine.. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 575–582, Vienna 2004, ISBN 1-58113-702-8

nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Giles, J. (2005). »Internet encyclopaedias go head to head: Jimmy Wales' Wikipedia comes close to Britannica in terms of the accuracy of its science entries«. Nature. 438 (7070): 900–1. Bibcode:2005Natur.438..900G. doi:10.1038/438900a. PMID 16355180. The study (which was not in itself peer-reviewed) was cited in many news articles such as this: »Wikipedia survives research test«. BBC News. BBC. 15. december 2005. Arhivirano iz spletišča dne 7. avgusta 2012. Pridobljeno 18. julija 2006.

nytimes.com

»The New York Times«. 14. februar 2017.

slate.com

»The Coronavirus Is Stress-Testing Wikipedia's Systems—and Editors«.

theatlantic.com

»Mapping Wikipedia«.

vice.com

»Nearly All of Wikipedia Is Written By Just 1 Percent of Its Editors«.

web.archive.org

Fernanda B. Viégas, Martin Wattenberg, Kushal Dave: Studying Cooperation and Conflict between Authors with history flow Visualizations Arhivirano January 25, 2006, na Wayback Machine.. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 575–582, Vienna 2004, ISBN 1-58113-702-8
history flow: results Arhivirano April 2, 2015, na Wayback Machine. IBM Collaborative User Experience Research Group, 2003
Fatally Flawed: Refuting the recent study on encyclopedic accuracy by the journal Nature Arhivirano July 9, 2016, na Wayback Machine. Encyclopædia Britannica, March 2006
Giles, J. (2005). »Internet encyclopaedias go head to head: Jimmy Wales' Wikipedia comes close to Britannica in terms of the accuracy of its science entries«. Nature. 438 (7070): 900–1. Bibcode:2005Natur.438..900G. doi:10.1038/438900a. PMID 16355180. The study (which was not in itself peer-reviewed) was cited in many news articles such as this: »Wikipedia survives research test«. BBC News. BBC. 15. december 2005. Arhivirano iz spletišča dne 7. avgusta 2012. Pridobljeno 18. julija 2006.

wikipedia.org

en.wikipedia.org

Fernanda B. Viégas, Martin Wattenberg, Kushal Dave: Studying Cooperation and Conflict between Authors with history flow Visualizations Arhivirano January 25, 2006, na Wayback Machine.. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 575–582, Vienna 2004, ISBN 1-58113-702-8