МИТ лиценца (Serbian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "МИТ лиценца" in Serbian language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Serbian rank
low place
low place
1st place
1st place
1,475th place
2,862nd place
5th place
12th place
68th place
107th place
1,983rd place
2,641st place
383rd place
1,569th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
657th place
239th place
482nd place
69th place
332nd place
651st place
low place
low place
low place
low place

bitlaw.com (Global: low place; Serbian: low place)

blackducksoftware.com (Global: low place; Serbian: low place)

cornell.edu (Global: 332nd place; Serbian: 651st place)

law.cornell.edu

europa.eu (Global: 68th place; Serbian: 107th place)

joinup.ec.europa.eu

  • „Licence Compatibility and Interoperability”. Open-Source Software - Develop, share, and reuse open source software for public administrations. joinup.ec.europa.eu. Архивирано из оригинала 2015-06-17. г. Приступљено 2015-05-30. „The licences for distributing free or open source software (FOSS) are divided in two families: permissive and copyleft. Permissive licences (BSD, MIT, X11, Apache, Zope) are generally compatible and interoperable with most other licences, tolerating to merge, combine or improve the covered code and to re-distribute it under many licences (including non-free or 'proprietary'). 

github.com (Global: 383rd place; Serbian: 1,569th place)

gnu.org (Global: 1,475th place; Serbian: 2,862nd place)

invisible-island.net (Global: low place; Serbian: low place)

opensource.com (Global: low place; Serbian: low place)

  • Haff, Gordon. „The mysterious history of the MIT License”. opensource.com. Приступљено 2019-07-30. „The date? The best single answer is probably 1987. But the complete story is more complicated and even a little mysterious. [...] Precursors from 1985. The X Consortium or X11 License variant from 1987. Or the Expat License from 1998 or 1999. 
  • Hanwell, Marcus D. (2014-01-28). „Should I use a permissive license? Copyleft? Or something in the middle?”. opensource.com. Приступљено 2015-05-30. „Permissive licensing simplifies things One reason the business world, and more and more developers [...], favor permissive licenses is in the simplicity of reuse. The license usually only pertains to the source code that is licensed and makes no attempt to infer any conditions upon any other component, and because of this there is no need to define what constitutes a derived work. I have also never seen a license compatibility chart for permissive licenses; it seems that they are all compatible. 

opensource.org (Global: low place; Serbian: low place)

reference.com (Global: 657th place; Serbian: 239th place)

dictionary.reference.com

scribd.com (Global: 482nd place; Serbian: 69th place)

stackexchange.com (Global: 1,983rd place; Serbian: 2,641st place)

softwareengineering.stackexchange.com

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; Serbian: 1st place)

  • „Licence Compatibility and Interoperability”. Open-Source Software - Develop, share, and reuse open source software for public administrations. joinup.ec.europa.eu. Архивирано из оригинала 2015-06-17. г. Приступљено 2015-05-30. „The licences for distributing free or open source software (FOSS) are divided in two families: permissive and copyleft. Permissive licences (BSD, MIT, X11, Apache, Zope) are generally compatible and interoperable with most other licences, tolerating to merge, combine or improve the covered code and to re-distribute it under many licences (including non-free or 'proprietary'). 
  • "Top 20 licenses" Архивирано на веб-сајту Wayback Machine (19. јул 2016).

worldcat.org (Global: 5th place; Serbian: 12th place)