„Licenses”. Android Open Source Project. Open Handset Alliance. Приступљено 9. 9. 2012. „'The preferred license for the Android Open Source Project is the Apache Software License, 2.0... Why Apache Software License? ... For userspace (that is, non-kernel) software, we do in fact prefer ASL2.0 (and similar licenses like BSD, MIT, etc.) over other licenses such as LGPL. Android is about freedom and choice. The purpose of Android is promote openness in the mobile world, but we don't believe it's possible to predict or dictate all the uses to which people will want to put our software. So, while we encourage everyone to make devices that are open and modifiable, we don't believe it is our place to force them to do so. Using LGPL libraries would often force them to do so.'”
Turner, David (7. 2. 2009). „Questions about Bionic”. „'The name "Bionic" comes from the fact that it is part-BSD and part-Linux: its source code consists in a mix of BSD C library pieces with custom Linux-specific bits used to deal with threads, processes, signals and a few others things.'”
Greg Kroah-Hartman (2. 2. 2010). „Android and the Linux kernel community”. Приступљено 20. 2. 2012. „'Google shows no sign of working to get their code upstream anymore. Some companies are trying to strip the Android-specific interfaces from their codebase and push that upstream, but that causes a much larger engineering effort, and is a pain that just should not be necessary.'”
Kennedy, Pagan (11. 10. 2013). „Who Made That Android Logo?”. The New York Times. The New York Times, October 11, 2013.CS1 одржавање: Формат датума (веза)
