Java collections framework (Serbian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Java collections framework" in Serbian language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Serbian rank
1,514th place
3,583rd place
1st place
1st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
179th place
200th place
3,206th place
low place

apache.org

commons.apache.org

digilife.be

javaworld.com

  • „Get started with the Java Collections Framework”. JavaWorld. 11. 01. 1998. Архивирано из оригинала 30. 03. 2010. г. Приступљено 1. 01. 2011. „'Before Collections made its most welcome debut, the standard methods for grouping Java objects were via the array, the Vector, and the Hashtable. All three of these collections have different methods and syntax for accessing members: arrays use the square bracket ([]) symbols, Vector uses the elementAt method, and Hashtable uses get and put methods.' 
  • „Need a good set of abstract data structures? ObjectSpace's JGL packs a punch!”. JavaWorld. 6. 01. 1997. Архивирано из оригинала 02. 03. 2012. г. Приступљено 1. 01. 2011. „'As with Java itself, the Java Generic Library borrows heavily from the C++ camp: It takes the best from C++'s STL, while leaving the C++ warts behind. Most C++ programmers today will know of their STL, but few are managing to exploit its potential.' 
  • „The battle of the container frameworks: which should you use?”. JavaWorld. 1. 01. 1999. Архивирано из оригинала 12. 04. 2010. г. Приступљено 1. 01. 2011. „'Comparing ObjectSpace Inc.'s JGL and Sun's Collections Framework turns out to be like comparing apples and kiwi fruits. At first sight, the two frameworks seem to be competing for the same developers, but after a closer inspection it is clear that the two cannot be compared fairly without acknowledging first that the two frameworks have different goals. If, like Sun's documentation states, Collections is going to homogenize Sun's own APIs (core API, extensions, etc.), then clearly Collections has to be great news, and a good thing, even to the most fanatic JGL addict. Provided Sun doesn't break its promise in this area, I'll be happy to invest my resources in adopting Collections in earnest. ' 

oracle.com

docs.oracle.com

download.oracle.com

oswego.edu

gee.cs.oswego.edu

  • Doug Lea. „Overview of the collections Package”. Приступљено 1. 01. 2011. „'The Sun Java Development Kit JDK1.2 finally includes a standard set of collection classes. While there are some design and implementation differences, the JDK1.2 package contains most of the same basic abstractions, structure, and functionality as this package. For this reason, this collections package will NOT be further updated' 

stanford.edu

web.archive.org

  • „Java Collections Framework” (PDF). IBM. Архивирано из оригинала (PDF) 7. 08. 2011. г. Приступљено 01. 01. 2011. 
  • „Get started with the Java Collections Framework”. JavaWorld. 11. 01. 1998. Архивирано из оригинала 30. 03. 2010. г. Приступљено 1. 01. 2011. „'Before Collections made its most welcome debut, the standard methods for grouping Java objects were via the array, the Vector, and the Hashtable. All three of these collections have different methods and syntax for accessing members: arrays use the square bracket ([]) symbols, Vector uses the elementAt method, and Hashtable uses get and put methods.' 
  • „Generic Collection Library for Java™”. Архивирано из оригинала 12. 03. 2009. г. Приступљено 1. 01. 2011. 
  • „Need a good set of abstract data structures? ObjectSpace's JGL packs a punch!”. JavaWorld. 6. 01. 1997. Архивирано из оригинала 02. 03. 2012. г. Приступљено 1. 01. 2011. „'As with Java itself, the Java Generic Library borrows heavily from the C++ camp: It takes the best from C++'s STL, while leaving the C++ warts behind. Most C++ programmers today will know of their STL, but few are managing to exploit its potential.' 
  • „The battle of the container frameworks: which should you use?”. JavaWorld. 1. 01. 1999. Архивирано из оригинала 12. 04. 2010. г. Приступљено 1. 01. 2011. „'Comparing ObjectSpace Inc.'s JGL and Sun's Collections Framework turns out to be like comparing apples and kiwi fruits. At first sight, the two frameworks seem to be competing for the same developers, but after a closer inspection it is clear that the two cannot be compared fairly without acknowledging first that the two frameworks have different goals. If, like Sun's documentation states, Collections is going to homogenize Sun's own APIs (core API, extensions, etc.), then clearly Collections has to be great news, and a good thing, even to the most fanatic JGL addict. Provided Sun doesn't break its promise in this area, I'll be happy to invest my resources in adopting Collections in earnest. '