Naivna teorija skupova (Serbian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Naivna teorija skupova" in Serbian language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Serbian rank
low place
low place
1st place
1st place
549th place
232nd place
8,437th place
280th place
451st place
838th place
3rd place
2nd place
5,626th place
low place
2nd place
4th place
5,814th place
4,326th place

ams.org

  • Mac Lane, Saunders (1971), „Categorical algebra and set-theoretic foundations”, Axiomatic Set Theory (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Vol. XIII, Part I, Univ. California, Los Angeles, Calif., 1967), Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, R.I., стр. 231—240, MR 0282791 . "The working mathematicians usually thought in terms of a naïve set theory (probably one more or less equivalent to ZF) ... a practical requirement [of any new foundational system] could be that this system could be used "naïvely" by mathematicians not sophisticated in foundational research" (p. 236).

books.google.com

  • Mac Lane, Saunders (1971), „Categorical algebra and set-theoretic foundations”, Axiomatic Set Theory (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Vol. XIII, Part I, Univ. California, Los Angeles, Calif., 1967), Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, R.I., стр. 231—240, MR 0282791 . "The working mathematicians usually thought in terms of a naïve set theory (probably one more or less equivalent to ZF) ... a practical requirement [of any new foundational system] could be that this system could be used "naïvely" by mathematicians not sophisticated in foundational research" (p. 236).

digizeitschriften.de

doi.org

elte.hu

bolyai.cs.elte.hu

tripod.com

jeff560.tripod.com

  • Jeff Miller writes that naïve set theory (as opposed to axiomatic set theory) was used occasionally in the 1940s and became an established term in the 1950s. It appears in Hermann Weyl's review of P. A. Schilpp (Ed). (1946). “The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell” American Mathematical Monthly, 53(4), p. 210 and in a review by Laszlo Kalmar. (1946). “The Paradox of Kleene and Rosser”. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 11(4), p. 136. (JSTOR). [1] The term was later popularized in a book by Paul Halmos (1960). Naïve Set Theory.

unizg.hr

math.pmf.unizg.hr

web.archive.org

wikipedia.org

de.wikipedia.org

en.wikipedia.org

  • Mac Lane, Saunders (1971), „Categorical algebra and set-theoretic foundations”, Axiomatic Set Theory (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Vol. XIII, Part I, Univ. California, Los Angeles, Calif., 1967), Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, R.I., стр. 231—240, MR 0282791 . "The working mathematicians usually thought in terms of a naïve set theory (probably one more or less equivalent to ZF) ... a practical requirement [of any new foundational system] could be that this system could be used "naïvely" by mathematicians not sophisticated in foundational research" (p. 236).