Stallman, Richard (16. 6. 2007). „Why "Open Source" misses the point of Free Software”. Philosophy of the GNU Project. Free Software Foundation. Архивирано из оригинала 4. 8. 2011. г. Приступљено 23. 7. 2007. „As the advocates of open source draw new users into our community, we free software activists have to work even more to bring the issue of freedom to those new users' attention. We have to say, 'It's free software and it gives you freedom!'—more and louder than ever. Every time you say 'free software' rather than 'open source,' you help our campaign.”CS1 одржавање: Формат датума (веза)
Stallman, Richard (19. 6. 2007). „Why "Free Software" is better than "Open Source"”. Philosophy of the GNU Project. Free Software Foundation. Архивирано из оригинала 27. 3. 2021. г. Приступљено 23. 7. 2007. „Sooner or later these users will be invited to switch back to proprietary software for some practical advantage. Countless companies seek to offer such temptation, and why would users decline? Only if they have learned to value the freedom free software gives them, for its own sake. It is up to us to spread this idea—and in order to do that, we have to talk about freedom. A certain amount of the 'keep quiet' approach to business can be useful for the community, but we must have plenty of freedom talk too.”CS1 одржавање: Формат датума (веза)
Stallman, Richard (16. 6. 2007). „Why "Open Source" misses the point of Free Software”. Philosophy of the GNU Project. Free Software Foundation. Архивирано из оригинала 4. 8. 2011. г. Приступљено 23. 7. 2007. „Under the pressure of the movie and record companies, software for individuals to use is increasingly designed specifically to restrict them. This malicious feature is known as DRM or Digital Restrictions Management (see DefectiveByDesign.org), and it is the antithesis in spirit of the freedom that free software aims to provide. [...] Yet some open source supporters have proposed 'open source DRM' software. Their idea is that by publishing the source code of programs designed to restrict your access to encrypted media, and allowing others to change it, they will produce more powerful and reliable software for restricting users like you. Then it will be delivered to you in devices that do not allow you to change it. This software might be 'open source,' and use the open source development model; but it won't be free software since it won't respect the freedom of the users that actually run it. If the open source development model succeeds in making this software more powerful and reliable for restricting you, that will make it even worse.”CS1 одржавање: Формат датума (веза)
„The Open Source Definition”. 7. 7. 2006. Архивирано из оригинала 15. 10. 2013. г. Приступљено 24. 8. 2008.CS1 одржавање: Формат датума (веза), The Open Source Definition according to the Open Source Initiative
Tiemann, Michael. „History of the OSI”. Open Source Initiative. Архивирано из оригинала 24. 9. 2006. г. Приступљено 13. 5. 2014.CS1 одржавање: Формат датума (веза)
„The Open Source Definition”. 7. 7. 2006. Архивирано из оригинала 15. 10. 2013. г. Приступљено 24. 8. 2008.CS1 одржавање: Формат датума (веза), The Open Source Definition according to the Open Source Initiative
Tiemann, Michael. „History of the OSI”. Open Source Initiative. Архивирано из оригинала 24. 9. 2006. г. Приступљено 13. 5. 2014.CS1 одржавање: Формат датума (веза)
Stallman, Richard (16. 6. 2007). „Why "Open Source" misses the point of Free Software”. Philosophy of the GNU Project. Free Software Foundation. Архивирано из оригинала 4. 8. 2011. г. Приступљено 23. 7. 2007. „As the advocates of open source draw new users into our community, we free software activists have to work even more to bring the issue of freedom to those new users' attention. We have to say, 'It's free software and it gives you freedom!'—more and louder than ever. Every time you say 'free software' rather than 'open source,' you help our campaign.”CS1 одржавање: Формат датума (веза)
Stallman, Richard (19. 6. 2007). „Why "Free Software" is better than "Open Source"”. Philosophy of the GNU Project. Free Software Foundation. Архивирано из оригинала 27. 3. 2021. г. Приступљено 23. 7. 2007. „Sooner or later these users will be invited to switch back to proprietary software for some practical advantage. Countless companies seek to offer such temptation, and why would users decline? Only if they have learned to value the freedom free software gives them, for its own sake. It is up to us to spread this idea—and in order to do that, we have to talk about freedom. A certain amount of the 'keep quiet' approach to business can be useful for the community, but we must have plenty of freedom talk too.”CS1 одржавање: Формат датума (веза)
Stallman, Richard (16. 6. 2007). „Why "Open Source" misses the point of Free Software”. Philosophy of the GNU Project. Free Software Foundation. Архивирано из оригинала 4. 8. 2011. г. Приступљено 23. 7. 2007. „Under the pressure of the movie and record companies, software for individuals to use is increasingly designed specifically to restrict them. This malicious feature is known as DRM or Digital Restrictions Management (see DefectiveByDesign.org), and it is the antithesis in spirit of the freedom that free software aims to provide. [...] Yet some open source supporters have proposed 'open source DRM' software. Their idea is that by publishing the source code of programs designed to restrict your access to encrypted media, and allowing others to change it, they will produce more powerful and reliable software for restricting users like you. Then it will be delivered to you in devices that do not allow you to change it. This software might be 'open source,' and use the open source development model; but it won't be free software since it won't respect the freedom of the users that actually run it. If the open source development model succeeds in making this software more powerful and reliable for restricting you, that will make it even worse.”CS1 одржавање: Формат датума (веза)
