Консеквенцијализам (Serbian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Консеквенцијализам" in Serbian language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Serbian rank

5books.google.com

3^rd place

2^nd place

4archive.org

6^th place

5^th place

3web.archive.org

1^st place

3doi.org

2^nd place

4^th place

2stanford.edu

179^th place

200^th place

2utexas.edu

916^th place

960^th place

1cambridge.org

305^th place

325^th place

1utilitarianism.com

low place

1utm.edu

1,379^th place

797^th place

1amazon.co.uk

448^th place

1,663^rd place

1jstor.org

26^th place

57^th place

1springer.com

274^th place

510^th place

1worldcat.org

5^th place

12^th place

1nih.gov

4^th place

8^th place

1uncc.edu

low place

amazon.co.uk

Hooker, Brad. Ideal Code, Real World. Oxford University Press, new edition 2002, back cover.

archive.org

Scheffler, Samuel, ур. (1988). Consequentialism and Its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-875073-4.
Loewe, Michael; Shaughnessy, Edward L. (1999). The Cambridge History of Ancient China. Cambridge University Press. стр. 761. ISBN 978-0-521-47030-8.
Van Norden, Bryan W. (2011). Introduction to Classical Chinese Philosophy. Hackett Publishing. стр. 52. ISBN 978-1-60384-468-0.
Hooker, Brad (2000). Ideal Code, Real World. стр. 101. . Oxford University Press..

books.google.com

Mizzoni, John (31. 8. 2009). Ethics: The Basics. John Wiley & Sons. стр. 104. ISBN 978-1-4051-8994-1.
Mo, Di; Xunzi; Di Mo Xunzi Fei Han; Professor Burton Watson (1967). Basic Writings of Mo Tzu, Hsün Tzu, and Han Fei Tzu. Columbia University Press. стр. 110. ISBN 978-0-231-02515-7.
Garfield, Jay L.; Edelglass, William (2011). The Oxford Handbook of World Philosophy. Oxford University Press. стр. 62. ISBN 978-0-19-532899-8. „The goods that serve as criteria of morality are collective or public, in contrast, for instance, to individual happiness or well-being”
Chatterjee, Deen K. (2011). Encyclopedia of Global Justice. Springer. стр. 1170. ISBN 978-1-4020-9159-9. „in this sense, one can interpret Xunzi's political philosophy as a form of state utilitarianism or state consequentialism”
Vardy, Charlotte (2012). Ethics Matters. SCM Press. ISBN 978-0-334-04391-1. Приступљено 19. 8. 2013. Референца на страници 116 ове књиге каже: У Како правити добре одлуке и бити у праву све време: Решавање загонетке исправног и погрешног, Лондон: Континуум. 2008, Ијан Кинг развија квазиутилитаристички систем компатибилан са етиком заснованом на последици, врлини и чину.

cambridge.org

dictionary.cambridge.org

Cambridge Dictionary: the end justifies the means

doi.org

Adams, R. M (1976). „Motive Utilitarianism”. Journal of Philosophy. 73 (14): 467—481. JSTOR 2025783. doi:10.2307/2025783.
Haigh, Matthew; Wood, Jeffrey S.; Stewart, Andrew J. (1. 7. 2016). „Slippery slope arguments imply opposition to change”. Memory & Cognition. 44 (5): 819—836. ISSN 0090-502X. PMID 26886759. doi:10.3758/s13421-016-0596-9.
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958). „Modern Moral Philosophy”. Philosophy. 1958. 33 (124): 1—19. doi:10.1017/S0031819100037943. Архивирано из оригинала 31. 01. 2010. г. Приступљено 22. 10. 2017.

jstor.org

Adams, R. M (1976). „Motive Utilitarianism”. Journal of Philosophy. 73 (14): 467—481. JSTOR 2025783. doi:10.2307/2025783.

nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Haigh, Matthew; Wood, Jeffrey S.; Stewart, Andrew J. (1. 7. 2016). „Slippery slope arguments imply opposition to change”. Memory & Cognition. 44 (5): 819—836. ISSN 0090-502X. PMID 26886759. doi:10.3758/s13421-016-0596-9.

springer.com

link.springer.com

Haigh, Matthew; Wood, Jeffrey S.; Stewart, Andrew J. (1. 7. 2016). „Slippery slope arguments imply opposition to change”. Memory & Cognition. 44 (5): 819—836. ISSN 0090-502X. PMID 26886759. doi:10.3758/s13421-016-0596-9.

stanford.edu

plato.stanford.edu

Fraser, Chris. „Mohism”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edward N. Zalta.
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter (зима 2015). „Consequentialism”. Ур.: Zalta, Edward N. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.

uncc.edu

philosophy.uncc.edu

Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958). „Modern Moral Philosophy”. Philosophy. 1958. 33 (124): 1—19. doi:10.1017/S0031819100037943. Архивирано из оригинала 31. 01. 2010. г. Приступљено 22. 10. 2017.

utexas.edu

la.utexas.edu

Sidgwick, Henry (1907). The Method of Ethics. NY: Dover (1981). ISBN 978-0-915145-28-7. Архивирано из оригинала 9. 12. 2007. г.
Bentham, Jeremy (1996). An Introduction to the Principles of Moral Legislation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-820516-6. Архивирано из оригинала 5. 1. 2008. г.

utilitarianism.com

Mill, John Stuart (1998). Utilitarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-875163-2.

utm.edu

iep.utm.edu

Fisher, James; Dowdwen, Bradley. Ethics. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

web.archive.org

Sidgwick, Henry (1907). The Method of Ethics. NY: Dover (1981). ISBN 978-0-915145-28-7. Архивирано из оригинала 9. 12. 2007. г.
Bentham, Jeremy (1996). An Introduction to the Principles of Moral Legislation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-820516-6. Архивирано из оригинала 5. 1. 2008. г.
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958). „Modern Moral Philosophy”. Philosophy. 1958. 33 (124): 1—19. doi:10.1017/S0031819100037943. Архивирано из оригинала 31. 01. 2010. г. Приступљено 22. 10. 2017.

worldcat.org

Haigh, Matthew; Wood, Jeffrey S.; Stewart, Andrew J. (1. 7. 2016). „Slippery slope arguments imply opposition to change”. Memory & Cognition. 44 (5): 819—836. ISSN 0090-502X. PMID 26886759. doi:10.3758/s13421-016-0596-9.