Lynch, Ian J. (18. 11. 2020). „A cold winter for peace in Nagorno-Karabakh?”. Ahval (на језику: енглески). Архивирано из оригинала 2. 12. 2020. г. Приступљено 27. 6. 2023. „The new agreement allows Azerbaijan to keep the territory it took by force, including Shusha and Hadrut, within the historic boundaries of Nagorno-Karabakh. It also requires Armenian forces to turn over other territories they have occupied for the last 26 years, including the so-called Lachin corridor, which is Nagorno-Karabakh’s primary link to Armenia proper.”CS1 одржавање: Формат датума (веза)
„Violence and Politics in Armenia-Azerbaijan Relations”. Baku Research Institute (на језику: енглески). Архивирано из оригинала 8. 6. 2023. г. Приступљено 27. 6. 2023. „As a result of the 2020 war, however, Azerbaijan received all territories around Soviet-era Nagorno Karabakh that were occupied by Armenian forces during the first Karabakh war, plus the two regions of Nagorno Karabakh proper: Shushi/Shusha and Hadrut.”
doi.org
Cheterian, Vicken (20. 10. 2022). „Technological determinism or strategic advantage? Comparing the two Karabakh Wars between Armenia and Azerbaijan”. Journal of Strategic Studies (на језику: енглески): 1—24. ISSN0140-2390. doi:10.1080/01402390.2022.2127093. „The Armenian side also lost territories within the former NKAO, namely the district of Hadrut and the strategic town of Shusha/Shushi, areas that were not even considered for handover to Azerbaijan during the long years of diplomatic negotiations between the two wars.”
„Violence and Politics in Armenia-Azerbaijan Relations”. Baku Research Institute (на језику: енглески). Архивирано из оригинала 8. 6. 2023. г. Приступљено 27. 6. 2023. „As a result of the 2020 war, however, Azerbaijan received all territories around Soviet-era Nagorno Karabakh that were occupied by Armenian forces during the first Karabakh war, plus the two regions of Nagorno Karabakh proper: Shushi/Shusha and Hadrut.”
Lynch, Ian J. (18. 11. 2020). „A cold winter for peace in Nagorno-Karabakh?”. Ahval (на језику: енглески). Архивирано из оригинала 2. 12. 2020. г. Приступљено 27. 6. 2023. „The new agreement allows Azerbaijan to keep the territory it took by force, including Shusha and Hadrut, within the historic boundaries of Nagorno-Karabakh. It also requires Armenian forces to turn over other territories they have occupied for the last 26 years, including the so-called Lachin corridor, which is Nagorno-Karabakh’s primary link to Armenia proper.”CS1 одржавање: Формат датума (веза)
Cheterian, Vicken (20. 10. 2022). „Technological determinism or strategic advantage? Comparing the two Karabakh Wars between Armenia and Azerbaijan”. Journal of Strategic Studies (на језику: енглески): 1—24. ISSN0140-2390. doi:10.1080/01402390.2022.2127093. „The Armenian side also lost territories within the former NKAO, namely the district of Hadrut and the strategic town of Shusha/Shushi, areas that were not even considered for handover to Azerbaijan during the long years of diplomatic negotiations between the two wars.”