Парапсихологија (Serbian Wikipedia)
Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Парапсихологија" in Serbian language version.
refsWebsite
Global rank
Serbian rank
6th place
5th place
18th place
28th place
1st place
1st place
low place
low place
5,915th place
low place
low place
low place
102nd place
266th place
234th place
287th place
3rd place
2nd place
low place
low place
archive.org
- Alcock, James (1981). Parapsychology-Science Or Magic?: A Psychological Perspective. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press. стр. 194–196. ISBN 978-0080257730.
- Cordón, Luis A. (2005). Popular Psychology: An Encyclopedia. Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press. стр. 182. ISBN 978-0-313-32457-4. „The essential problem is that a large portion of the scientific community, including most research psychologists, regards parapsychology as a pseudoscience, due largely to its failure to move beyond null results in the way science usually does. Ordinarily, when experimental evidence fails repeatedly to support a hypothesis, that hypothesis is abandoned. Within parapsychology, however, more than a century of experimentation has failed even to conclusively demonstrate the mere existence of paranormal phenomenon, yet parapsychologists continue to pursue that elusive goal.”
- Melton, J. G. (1996). Parapsychology. In Encyclopedia of Occultism & Parapsychology. Farmington Hills, Michigan: Thomson Gale. ISBN 978-0-8103-9487-2.
- Irwin, Harvey J.; Watt, Caroline A. (2007). An Introduction to Parapsychology (5th изд.). Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company. стр. 6. ISBN 978-0786430598.
- Wynn, Charles M.; Wiggins, Arthur W. (2001). Quantum Leaps in the Wrong Direction: Where Real Science Ends...and Pseudoscience Begins. Joseph Henry Press. стр. 152. ISBN 978-0309073097.
books.google.com
- Bringmann, Wolfgang G.; Lück, Helmut E. (15. 6. 1997). A Pictorial History of Psychology. Quintessence Pub. ISBN 978-0-86715-292-0.
doi.org
- Hacking, Ian (1993). „Some reasons for not taking parapsychology very seriously”. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. 32 (3): 587—594. doi:10.1017/s0012217300012361.
- Bierman, DJ; Spottiswoode, JP; Bijl, A (2016). „Testing for Questionable Research Practices in a Meta-Analysis: An Example from Experimental Parapsychology”. PLoS ONE. San Francisco, California: Public Library of Science. 11 (5): 1. Bibcode:2016PLoSO..1153049B. PMC 4856278
. PMID 27144889. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153049. „We consider [questionable research practices] in the context of a meta-analysis database of Ganzfeld–telepathy experiments from the field of experimental parapsychology. The Ganzfeld database is particularly suitable for this study, because the parapsychological phenomenon it investigates is widely believed to be nonexistent ... results are still significant (p = 0.003) with QRPs.” - Odling-Smee, Lucy (1. 3. 2007). „The lab that asked the wrong questions”. Nature. 446 (7131): 10—11. Bibcode:2007Natur.446...10O. PMID 17330012. doi:10.1038/446010a. Приступљено 29. 6. 2007. „[Outside the US] the field is livelier. Britain is a lead player, with privately funded labs at the universities of Edinburgh, Northampton and Liverpool Hope, among others."..."The status of paranormal research in the United States is now at an all-time low, after a relative surge of interest in the 1970s. Money continues to pour from philanthropic sources to private institutions, but any chance of credibility depends on ties with universities, and only a trickle of research now persists in university labs.”
-
- Hyman, R. (1986). „Parapsychological research: A tutorial review and critical appraisal” (PDF). Proceedings of the IEEE. 74 (6): 823—849. doi:10.1109/PROC.1986.13557. Приступљено 20. 9. 2008.
- Thouless, R. H. (1942). „Experiments on paranormal guessing”. British Journal of Psychology. London, England: Wiley-Blackwell. 33: 15—27. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1942.tb01036.x.
ed.ac.uk
koestler-parapsychology.psy.ed.ac.uk
- „Koestler Parapsychology Unit”. University of Edinburgh. Приступљено 9. 3. 2009.
google.ca
books.google.ca
- Friedlander, Michael W. (1998). At the Fringes of Science. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press. стр. 119. ISBN 978-0-8133-2200-1. „Parapsychology has failed to gain general scientific acceptance even for its improved methods and claimed successes, and it is still treated with a lopsided ambivalence among the scientific community. Most scientists write it off as pseudoscience unworthy of their time.”
handle.net
hdl.handle.net
- Pigliucci, Massimo; Boudry, Maarten (2013). Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. Chicago, Illinois: University Of Chicago Press. стр. 158. ISBN 978-0-226-05196-3. hdl:1854/LU-3161824. „Many observers refer to the field as a 'pseudoscience'. When mainstream scientists say that the field of parapsychology is not scientific, they mean that no satisfying naturalistic cause-and-effect explanation for these supposed effects has yet been proposed and that the field's experiments cannot be consistently replicated.”
harvard.edu
adsabs.harvard.edu
- Bierman, DJ; Spottiswoode, JP; Bijl, A (2016). „Testing for Questionable Research Practices in a Meta-Analysis: An Example from Experimental Parapsychology”. PLoS ONE. San Francisco, California: Public Library of Science. 11 (5): 1. Bibcode:2016PLoSO..1153049B. PMC 4856278 . PMID 27144889. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153049. „We consider [questionable research practices] in the context of a meta-analysis database of Ganzfeld–telepathy experiments from the field of experimental parapsychology. The Ganzfeld database is particularly suitable for this study, because the parapsychological phenomenon it investigates is widely believed to be nonexistent ... results are still significant (p = 0.003) with QRPs.”
- Odling-Smee, Lucy (1. 3. 2007). „The lab that asked the wrong questions”. Nature. 446 (7131): 10—11. Bibcode:2007Natur.446...10O. PMID 17330012. doi:10.1038/446010a. Приступљено 29. 6. 2007. „[Outside the US] the field is livelier. Britain is a lead player, with privately funded labs at the universities of Edinburgh, Northampton and Liverpool Hope, among others."..."The status of paranormal research in the United States is now at an all-time low, after a relative surge of interest in the 1970s. Money continues to pour from philanthropic sources to private institutions, but any chance of credibility depends on ties with universities, and only a trickle of research now persists in university labs.”
iapsop.com
- Dessoir, Max (јун 1889). „Die Parapsychologie” [Parapsychology] (PDF). Sphinx (на језику: немачки). 7 (42): 341 — преко IAPSOP.
ieee.org
ieeexplore.ieee.org
-
- Hyman, R. (1986). „Parapsychological research: A tutorial review and critical appraisal” (PDF). Proceedings of the IEEE. 74 (6): 823—849. doi:10.1109/PROC.1986.13557. Приступљено 20. 9. 2008.
nature.com
- Odling-Smee, Lucy (1. 3. 2007). „The lab that asked the wrong questions”. Nature. 446 (7131): 10—11. Bibcode:2007Natur.446...10O. PMID 17330012. doi:10.1038/446010a. Приступљено 29. 6. 2007. „[Outside the US] the field is livelier. Britain is a lead player, with privately funded labs at the universities of Edinburgh, Northampton and Liverpool Hope, among others."..."The status of paranormal research in the United States is now at an all-time low, after a relative surge of interest in the 1970s. Money continues to pour from philanthropic sources to private institutions, but any chance of credibility depends on ties with universities, and only a trickle of research now persists in university labs.”
nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Bierman, DJ; Spottiswoode, JP; Bijl, A (2016). „Testing for Questionable Research Practices in a Meta-Analysis: An Example from Experimental Parapsychology”. PLoS ONE. San Francisco, California: Public Library of Science. 11 (5): 1. Bibcode:2016PLoSO..1153049B. PMC 4856278 . PMID 27144889. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153049. „We consider [questionable research practices] in the context of a meta-analysis database of Ganzfeld–telepathy experiments from the field of experimental parapsychology. The Ganzfeld database is particularly suitable for this study, because the parapsychological phenomenon it investigates is widely believed to be nonexistent ... results are still significant (p = 0.003) with QRPs.”
- Odling-Smee, Lucy (1. 3. 2007). „The lab that asked the wrong questions”. Nature. 446 (7131): 10—11. Bibcode:2007Natur.446...10O. PMID 17330012. doi:10.1038/446010a. Приступљено 29. 6. 2007. „[Outside the US] the field is livelier. Britain is a lead player, with privately funded labs at the universities of Edinburgh, Northampton and Liverpool Hope, among others."..."The status of paranormal research in the United States is now at an all-time low, after a relative surge of interest in the 1970s. Money continues to pour from philanthropic sources to private institutions, but any chance of credibility depends on ties with universities, and only a trickle of research now persists in university labs.”
parapsych.org
- „Parapsychology FAQ Page 1”. Parapsych.org. 28. 2. 2008. Архивирано из оригинала 26. 6. 2007. г. Приступљено 11. 4. 2014.
- „Glossary of Psi (Parapsychological) Terms (L-R)”. Parapsych.org. Архивирано из оригинала 24. 8. 2010. г. Приступљено 11. 4. 2014.
skepticalinquirer.org
- Reber, Arthur; Alcock, James (2019). „Why parapsychological claims cannot be true”. Skeptical Inquirer. 43 (4): 8—10.
web.archive.org
- „Parapsychology FAQ Page 1”. Parapsych.org. 28. 2. 2008. Архивирано из оригинала 26. 6. 2007. г. Приступљено 11. 4. 2014.
- „Glossary of Psi (Parapsychological) Terms (L-R)”. Parapsych.org. Архивирано из оригинала 24. 8. 2010. г. Приступљено 11. 4. 2014.
wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
- Pigliucci, Massimo; Boudry, Maarten (2013). Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. Chicago, Illinois: University Of Chicago Press. стр. 158. ISBN 978-0-226-05196-3. hdl:1854/LU-3161824. „Many observers refer to the field as a 'pseudoscience'. When mainstream scientists say that the field of parapsychology is not scientific, they mean that no satisfying naturalistic cause-and-effect explanation for these supposed effects has yet been proposed and that the field's experiments cannot be consistently replicated.”
wired.com
- Carroll, Sean (11. 5. 2016). „Thinking About Psychic Powers Helps Us Think About Science”. WIRED. New York City: Condé Nast. „Today, parapsychology is not taken seriously by most academics.”