Smith, Naomi; Walters, Peter (2017-10-25). ”Desire lines and defensive architecture in modern urban environments” (på amerikansk engelska). Urban Studies 55 (13): sid. 2980–2995. doi:10.1177/0042098017732690. ISSN0042-0980. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098017732690. Läst 15 juni 2020. ”There is a danger that defensive controls of the publicare ignored, or are framed as beneficial (e.g.Carmona and Wunderlich, 2012). A lack of academic critique or investigation of the integration of defensive architecture in public space means that these means may be advocated as ‘best practice’ without the attendant debate that examines the type of social spaces they produce.”.
Wade, Lisa. ”Unkind Architecture: Designing Against the Homeless” (på engelska). Pacific Standard. https://psmag.com/environment/unkind-architecture-designing-against-the-homeless. Läst 22 augusti 2021. ”Andreuo writes of the psychological effect of these structures. They tell homeless people quite clearly that they are not wanted and that others not only don’t care, but are actively antagonistic to their comfort and well-being. He says:
Defensive architecture is revealing on a number of levels, because it is not the product of accident or thoughtlessness, but a thought process. It is a sort of unkindness that is considered, designed, approved, funded and made real with the explicit motive to exclude and harass. It reveals how corporate hygiene has overridden human considerations....
[...]
We curse the destitute for urinating in public spaces with no thought about how far the nearest free public toilet might be. We blame them for their poor hygiene without questioning the lack of public facilities for washing.... Free shelters, unless one belongs to a particularly vulnerable group, are actually extremely rare.
[...] Andreuo argues, “is designed to exonerate the rest from responsibility and insulate them from perceiving risk.” If homeless people are just failing to do right by themselves or take the help available to them, then only they are to blame for their situation. And, if only they are to blame, we don’t have to worry that, given just the right turn of events, it could happen to us.”
Smith, Naomi; Walters, Peter (2017-10-25). ”Desire lines and defensive architecture in modern urban environments” (på amerikansk engelska). Urban Studies 55 (13): sid. 2980–2995. doi:10.1177/0042098017732690. ISSN0042-0980. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098017732690. Läst 15 juni 2020. ”There is a danger that defensive controls of the publicare ignored, or are framed as beneficial (e.g.Carmona and Wunderlich, 2012). A lack of academic critique or investigation of the integration of defensive architecture in public space means that these means may be advocated as ‘best practice’ without the attendant debate that examines the type of social spaces they produce.”.
Smith, Naomi; Walters, Peter (2017-10-25). ”Desire lines and defensive architecture in modern urban environments” (på amerikansk engelska). Urban Studies 55 (13): sid. 2980–2995. doi:10.1177/0042098017732690. ISSN0042-0980. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098017732690. Läst 15 juni 2020. ”There is a danger that defensive controls of the publicare ignored, or are framed as beneficial (e.g.Carmona and Wunderlich, 2012). A lack of academic critique or investigation of the integration of defensive architecture in public space means that these means may be advocated as ‘best practice’ without the attendant debate that examines the type of social spaces they produce.”.