Mathie, Robert T.; Ramparsad, Nitish; Legg, Lynn A.; Clausen, Jürgen; Moss, Sian; Davidson, Jonathan R. T. (2017-12). ”Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of non-individualised homeopathic treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis” (på engelska). Systematic Reviews 6 (1). doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0445-3. ISSN2046-4053. PMID 28340607. PMC: PMC5366148. http://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13643-017-0445-3. Läst 31 maj 2024. ”"Reliable evidence is lacking for all clinical conditions whose data have enabled separate meta-analysis."
"There was significant evidence of publication bias in favour of homeopathy. Our meta-analysis of the current reliable evidence base therefore fails to reject the null hypothesis that the outcome of treatment using a non-individualised homeopathic medicine is not distinguishable from that using placebo."
"There was a small, statistically significant, effect of non-individualised homeopathic treatment. However, the finding was not robust to sensitivity analysis based solely on the three trials that comprised reliable evidence: the effect size estimate collectively for those three trials was not statistically significant."
"Authors RTM, JC and SM are (or were) associated with a homeopathy charity whose principal aim is to clarify and extend an evidence base in homeopathy. RTM holds an independent research consultancy contract with the Deutsche Homöopathie-Union, Karlsruhe, Germany. RTM, JC and SM have no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. The University of Glasgow (authors NR, C-MM and AMcC) was supported by a grant from the British Homeopathic Association (now administered by the Homeopathy Research Institute, which holds the grant following its transfer from the BHA) during the conduct of the study; neither NR, C-MM nor AMcC has any other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. Author JRTD had no support from any organisation for the submitted work; in the last 3 years, and for activities outside the submitted study, he received personal fees, royalties or out-of-pocket expenses for advisory work, invitational lectures, use of rating scales, published book chapters, or committee membership; he receives royalties from Springer Publishing Company for his book, A Century of Homeopaths: Their Influence on Medicine and Health. JTRD has no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted study."”.
doi.org
dx.doi.org
Tuomela R (1987). ”Chapter 4: Science, Protoscience, and Pseudoscience”. i Pitt JC, Marcello P. Rational Changes in Science: Essays on Scientific Reasoning. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. "98". Springer. Sid. 83–101 . doi:10.1007/978-94-009-3779-6_4. ISBN 978-94-010-8181-8.
Mathie, Robert T.; Ramparsad, Nitish; Legg, Lynn A.; Clausen, Jürgen; Moss, Sian; Davidson, Jonathan R. T. (2017-12). ”Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of non-individualised homeopathic treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis” (på engelska). Systematic Reviews 6 (1). doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0445-3. ISSN2046-4053. PMID 28340607. PMC: PMC5366148. http://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13643-017-0445-3. Läst 31 maj 2024. ”"Reliable evidence is lacking for all clinical conditions whose data have enabled separate meta-analysis."
"There was significant evidence of publication bias in favour of homeopathy. Our meta-analysis of the current reliable evidence base therefore fails to reject the null hypothesis that the outcome of treatment using a non-individualised homeopathic medicine is not distinguishable from that using placebo."
"There was a small, statistically significant, effect of non-individualised homeopathic treatment. However, the finding was not robust to sensitivity analysis based solely on the three trials that comprised reliable evidence: the effect size estimate collectively for those three trials was not statistically significant."
"Authors RTM, JC and SM are (or were) associated with a homeopathy charity whose principal aim is to clarify and extend an evidence base in homeopathy. RTM holds an independent research consultancy contract with the Deutsche Homöopathie-Union, Karlsruhe, Germany. RTM, JC and SM have no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. The University of Glasgow (authors NR, C-MM and AMcC) was supported by a grant from the British Homeopathic Association (now administered by the Homeopathy Research Institute, which holds the grant following its transfer from the BHA) during the conduct of the study; neither NR, C-MM nor AMcC has any other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. Author JRTD had no support from any organisation for the submitted work; in the last 3 years, and for activities outside the submitted study, he received personal fees, royalties or out-of-pocket expenses for advisory work, invitational lectures, use of rating scales, published book chapters, or committee membership; he receives royalties from Springer Publishing Company for his book, A Century of Homeopaths: Their Influence on Medicine and Health. JTRD has no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted study."”.
Mathie, Robert T.; Ramparsad, Nitish; Legg, Lynn A.; Clausen, Jürgen; Moss, Sian; Davidson, Jonathan R. T. (2017-12). ”Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of non-individualised homeopathic treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis” (på engelska). Systematic Reviews 6 (1). doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0445-3. ISSN2046-4053. PMID 28340607. PMC: PMC5366148. http://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13643-017-0445-3. Läst 31 maj 2024. ”"Reliable evidence is lacking for all clinical conditions whose data have enabled separate meta-analysis."
"There was significant evidence of publication bias in favour of homeopathy. Our meta-analysis of the current reliable evidence base therefore fails to reject the null hypothesis that the outcome of treatment using a non-individualised homeopathic medicine is not distinguishable from that using placebo."
"There was a small, statistically significant, effect of non-individualised homeopathic treatment. However, the finding was not robust to sensitivity analysis based solely on the three trials that comprised reliable evidence: the effect size estimate collectively for those three trials was not statistically significant."
"Authors RTM, JC and SM are (or were) associated with a homeopathy charity whose principal aim is to clarify and extend an evidence base in homeopathy. RTM holds an independent research consultancy contract with the Deutsche Homöopathie-Union, Karlsruhe, Germany. RTM, JC and SM have no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. The University of Glasgow (authors NR, C-MM and AMcC) was supported by a grant from the British Homeopathic Association (now administered by the Homeopathy Research Institute, which holds the grant following its transfer from the BHA) during the conduct of the study; neither NR, C-MM nor AMcC has any other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. Author JRTD had no support from any organisation for the submitted work; in the last 3 years, and for activities outside the submitted study, he received personal fees, royalties or out-of-pocket expenses for advisory work, invitational lectures, use of rating scales, published book chapters, or committee membership; he receives royalties from Springer Publishing Company for his book, A Century of Homeopaths: Their Influence on Medicine and Health. JTRD has no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted study."”.
Mathie, Robert T.; Ramparsad, Nitish; Legg, Lynn A.; Clausen, Jürgen; Moss, Sian; Davidson, Jonathan R. T. (2017-12). ”Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of non-individualised homeopathic treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis” (på engelska). Systematic Reviews 6 (1). doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0445-3. ISSN2046-4053. PMID 28340607. PMC: PMC5366148. http://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13643-017-0445-3. Läst 31 maj 2024. ”"Reliable evidence is lacking for all clinical conditions whose data have enabled separate meta-analysis."
"There was significant evidence of publication bias in favour of homeopathy. Our meta-analysis of the current reliable evidence base therefore fails to reject the null hypothesis that the outcome of treatment using a non-individualised homeopathic medicine is not distinguishable from that using placebo."
"There was a small, statistically significant, effect of non-individualised homeopathic treatment. However, the finding was not robust to sensitivity analysis based solely on the three trials that comprised reliable evidence: the effect size estimate collectively for those three trials was not statistically significant."
"Authors RTM, JC and SM are (or were) associated with a homeopathy charity whose principal aim is to clarify and extend an evidence base in homeopathy. RTM holds an independent research consultancy contract with the Deutsche Homöopathie-Union, Karlsruhe, Germany. RTM, JC and SM have no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. The University of Glasgow (authors NR, C-MM and AMcC) was supported by a grant from the British Homeopathic Association (now administered by the Homeopathy Research Institute, which holds the grant following its transfer from the BHA) during the conduct of the study; neither NR, C-MM nor AMcC has any other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. Author JRTD had no support from any organisation for the submitted work; in the last 3 years, and for activities outside the submitted study, he received personal fees, royalties or out-of-pocket expenses for advisory work, invitational lectures, use of rating scales, published book chapters, or committee membership; he receives royalties from Springer Publishing Company for his book, A Century of Homeopaths: Their Influence on Medicine and Health. JTRD has no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted study."”.
