Opinion 2027 (Swedish Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Opinion 2027" in Swedish language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Swedish rank

2web.archive.org

1^st place

2nhm.ac.uk

2,525^th place

858^th place

nhm.ac.uk

”OPINION 2027 (Case 3010): Usage of 17 specific names based on wild species which are pre-dated by or contemporary with those based on domestic animals (Lepidoptera, Osteichthyes, Mammalia): conserved” (på engelska). the Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature (International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature) Volume 60, Part 1. 2003. Arkiverad från originalet den 9 juni 2011. https://web.archive.org/web/20110609014212/http://www.nhm.ac.uk/hosted_sites/iczn/BZNMar2003opinions.htm. Läst 2 maj 2010. ”Abstract. The Commission has conserved the usage of 17 specific names based on wild species, which are pre-dated by or contemporary with those based on domestic forms. The majority of wild progenitors and their domestic derivatives share the same name, but in the 17 cases considered (1 Lepidoptera, 1 Osteichthyes and 15 Mammalia) the wild and domestic forms have been separately named and this has created confusion.”.
Anthea Gentry, Juliet Clutton-Brock, Colin P. Groves (2002). ”Comment on the proposed conservation of usage of 15 mammal specific names based on wild species which are antedated by or contemporary with those based on domestic animals” (på engelska). the Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature (International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature) Volume 59, Part 1. Arkiverad från originalet den 12 maj 2011. https://web.archive.org/web/20110512053244/http://www.nhm.ac.uk/hosted_sites/iczn/BZNMar2002comments.htm#comment3010_59_1. Läst 2 maj 2010. ”However, confusion arises when, in a minority of cases, the two forms are treated as conspecific and the senior name (based on the domestic form) is adopted, or when the forms are treated as separate and the name for the domestic form is then transferred to the wild taxon. Our application seeks to stabilise the current majority usage of the 15 names for wild mammal species, which are the first available names in use based on wild populations.”. Arkiverad 12 maj 2011 hämtat från the Wayback Machine.

web.archive.org

”OPINION 2027 (Case 3010): Usage of 17 specific names based on wild species which are pre-dated by or contemporary with those based on domestic animals (Lepidoptera, Osteichthyes, Mammalia): conserved” (på engelska). the Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature (International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature) Volume 60, Part 1. 2003. Arkiverad från originalet den 9 juni 2011. https://web.archive.org/web/20110609014212/http://www.nhm.ac.uk/hosted_sites/iczn/BZNMar2003opinions.htm. Läst 2 maj 2010. ”Abstract. The Commission has conserved the usage of 17 specific names based on wild species, which are pre-dated by or contemporary with those based on domestic forms. The majority of wild progenitors and their domestic derivatives share the same name, but in the 17 cases considered (1 Lepidoptera, 1 Osteichthyes and 15 Mammalia) the wild and domestic forms have been separately named and this has created confusion.”.
Anthea Gentry, Juliet Clutton-Brock, Colin P. Groves (2002). ”Comment on the proposed conservation of usage of 15 mammal specific names based on wild species which are antedated by or contemporary with those based on domestic animals” (på engelska). the Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature (International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature) Volume 59, Part 1. Arkiverad från originalet den 12 maj 2011. https://web.archive.org/web/20110512053244/http://www.nhm.ac.uk/hosted_sites/iczn/BZNMar2002comments.htm#comment3010_59_1. Läst 2 maj 2010. ”However, confusion arises when, in a minority of cases, the two forms are treated as conspecific and the senior name (based on the domestic form) is adopted, or when the forms are treated as separate and the name for the domestic form is then transferred to the wild taxon. Our application seeks to stabilise the current majority usage of the 15 names for wild mammal species, which are the first available names in use based on wild populations.”. Arkiverad 12 maj 2011 hämtat från the Wayback Machine.