Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "தனிப்பட்ட வாழ்க்கை" in Tamil language version.
இந்நூலில் மிக அணுக்கமான உறவுகள் நம் சொந்த முன்னுரிமைகளால் தாக்கமுற்றாலும் பேரளவில் நம் தேர்வுகள் குடும்பச் சூழல்களாலும் அகல்விரிவான சமூக நிகழ்ச்சிகளாலும் வடிவம் பெறுகின்றன நான் வாதிடுகிறேன் [...].
{{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)[...] we turn to the writings of anthropologists and archaeologists, the majority of whom believe that our earliest ancestors were well fed and healthy. They obtained their subsistence by hunting and gathering, they had a relatively egalitarian ethic and more leisure time available to them than people in any subsequent mode of production.
For hundreds of years, almost from the beginning of corporate history, a divide between the personal life and professional life has been asserted. This is a false divide. [...] It is impossible to separate the personal from the professional: the two are intricately linked.
The virtues of personal life are to be regarded both from the side of control and from the side of culture. On the one hand the varied impulses and desires have to be regulated so as not to interfere with the realisation of the moral ideal.
[...] the guru may say, 'Go home and get your personal life straightened out. [...]'
For Tocqueville individualism meant the habit of living isolated from your fellows, of not concerning yourself with any public affairs, and of abandoning those matters to the care of the government as the only clearly visible representative of common interests. Like democratic materialism, democratic individualism led to the death of civic life and opened the door to any despotic power that would assume responsibility for shared interests. [...] We need to recognize that Toqueville [..] treated the United States as something of an exception. He had described the American republic as shielded from the worst effects of democratic materialism; in his analysis, it was also insulated from individualism.