மம்லூக்கிய மரபு (தில்லி) (Tamil Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "மம்லூக்கிய மரபு (தில்லி)" in Tamil language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Tamil rank
3rd place
6th place
6th place
8th place
121st place
221st place
2nd place
4th place
230th place
85th place
1st place
1st place
4,343rd place
152nd place

academia.edu

archive.org

  • Note: other sources describe the use of two flags: the black Abbasid flag, and the red Ghurid flag, as well as various banners with figures of the new moon, a dragon or a lion. "Large banners were carried with the army. In the beginning the sultans had only two colours : on the right were black flags, of Abbasid colour; and on the left they carried their own colour, red, which was derived from Ghor. Qutb-u'd-din Aibak's standards bore the figures of the new moon, a dragon or a lion; Firuz Shah's flags also displayed a dragon." in Qurashi, Ishtiyaq Hussian (1942). The Administration of the Sultanate of Delhi. Kashmiri Bazar Lahore: SH. MUHAMMAD ASHRAF. p. 143. , also in Jha, Sadan (8 January 2016). Reverence, Resistance and Politics of Seeing the Indian National Flag (in ஆங்கிலம்). Cambridge University Press. p. 36. ISBN 978-1-107-11887-4., also "On the right of the Sultan was carried the black standard of the Abbasids and on the left the red standard of Ghor." in Thapliyal, Uma Prasad (1938). The Dhvaja, Standards and Flags of India: A Study (in ஆங்கிலம்). B.R. Publishing Corporation. p. 94. ISBN 978-81-7018-092-0.
  • Nafziger, George F.; Walton, Mark W. (2003). Islam at War: A History. Praeger Publishers. p. 56. ISBN 9780275981013.

asi.nic.in

books.google.com

  • Note: other sources describe the use of two flags: the black Abbasid flag, and the red Ghurid flag, as well as various banners with figures of the new moon, a dragon or a lion. "Large banners were carried with the army. In the beginning the sultans had only two colours : on the right were black flags, of Abbasid colour; and on the left they carried their own colour, red, which was derived from Ghor. Qutb-u'd-din Aibak's standards bore the figures of the new moon, a dragon or a lion; Firuz Shah's flags also displayed a dragon." in Qurashi, Ishtiyaq Hussian (1942). The Administration of the Sultanate of Delhi. Kashmiri Bazar Lahore: SH. MUHAMMAD ASHRAF. p. 143. , also in Jha, Sadan (8 January 2016). Reverence, Resistance and Politics of Seeing the Indian National Flag (in ஆங்கிலம்). Cambridge University Press. p. 36. ISBN 978-1-107-11887-4., also "On the right of the Sultan was carried the black standard of the Abbasids and on the left the red standard of Ghor." in Thapliyal, Uma Prasad (1938). The Dhvaja, Standards and Flags of India: A Study (in ஆங்கிலம்). B.R. Publishing Corporation. p. 94. ISBN 978-81-7018-092-0.
  • Vincent A Smith, The Oxford History of India: From the Earliest Times to the End of 1911 கூகுள் புத்தகங்களில், Chapter 2, Oxford University Press
  • Eaton, Richard M. (25 July 2019). India in the Persianate Age: 1000-1765 (in ஆங்கிலம்). Penguin UK. pp. 48–49. ISBN 978-0-14-196655-7.
  • Eaton, Richard M. (25 July 2019). India in the Persianate Age: 1000–1765 (in ஆங்கிலம்). Penguin UK. pp. 48–49. ISBN 978-0-14-196655-7. The ethnicity of Turkish slaves, the earliest generation of whom dated to the Ghurid invasions of India, survived well into the thirteenth century. For a time, even Persian-speaking secretaries had to master Turkish in order to function. There persisted, more-over, deep cultural tensions between native Persian-speakers – whether from Iran, Khurasan or Central Asia – and ethnic Turks. Nizam al-Din Auliya (d. 1325), Delhi's renowned Sufi shaikh, characterized Turks as rude, bellicose and vain, reflecting a view, prevalent among many native Persians of the day, that Turks were uncultured boors who had illegitimately monopolized power and privilege. Such animosities were amplified by the asymmetrical power relations between ethnic Turks and Persians, often depicted in the literature as 'men of the sword' and 'men of the pen' respectively.
  • Jaswant Lal Mehta (1979). Advanced Study in the History of Medieval India. Sterling Publishers Pvt. p. 87. ISBN 978-81-207-0617-0. they actually belonged to three distinct ruling houses-the Qutbi dynasty (1206-11) founded by Qutubuddin Aibek, the first ilbari or shamsi dynasty (1211-66), known after Shamsuddin Iltutmish, and the second Ilbari dynasty (1266-90), founded by Ghiasuddin Balban.
  • Sisirkumar Mitra 1977, ப. 123-126. Sisirkumar Mitra (1977). The Early Rulers of Khajurāho. Motilal Banarsidass. ISBN 9788120819979.
  • Eaton, Richard M. (25 July 2019). India in the Persianate Age: 1000–1765 (in ஆங்கிலம்). Penguin UK. pp. 39–45. ISBN 978-0-14-196655-7.
  • Eaton, Richard M. (25 July 2019). India in the Persianate Age: 1000–1765. Penguin UK. pp. 45–57. ISBN 978-0-14-196655-7.
  • Satish Chandra (2004). Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals-Delhi Sultanat (1206–1526) – Part One (in ஆங்கிலம்). Har-Anand Publications. pp. 43–44. ISBN 978-81-241-1064-5.
  • Smith, Ronald Vivian (2005). The Delhi that No-one Knows (in ஆங்கிலம்). Orient Blackswan. p. 12. ISBN 978-81-8028-020-7.

doi.org

dx.doi.org

uchicago.edu

dsal.uchicago.edu

web.archive.org