การปฏิเสธการเปลี่ยนแปลงสภาพภูมิอากาศ (Thai Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "การปฏิเสธการเปลี่ยนแปลงสภาพภูมิอากาศ" in Thai language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Thai rank

11web.archive.org

1^st place

8doi.org

2^nd place

4^th place

5semanticscholar.org

11^th place

61^st place

4researchgate.net

120^th place

318^th place

2ncse.com

low place

2books.google.com

3^rd place

5^th place

1arstechnica.com

388^th place

1,439^th place

1theage.com.au

412^th place

783^rd place

1seattlepi.com

1,215^th place

4,033^rd place

1newsweek.com

269^th place

578^th place

1academia.edu

121^st place

151^st place

1ipcc.ch

1,778^th place

601^st place

1harvard.edu

18^th place

43^rd place

1scienceblogs.com

8,518^th place

low place

1nih.gov

4^th place

7^th place

1thenation.com

2,088^th place

4,659^th place

1archive.org

6^th place

20^th place

1guardian.co.uk

197^th place

161^st place

1theguardian.com

12^th place

51^st place

academia.edu

Nerlich 2010, pp. 419, 437: "Climate scepticism in the sense of climate denialism or contrarianism is not a new phenomenon, but it has recently been very much in the media spotlight. …. Such disagreements are not new but the emails provided climate sceptics, in the sense of deniers or contrarians, with a golden opportunity to mount a sustained effort aimed at demonstrating the legitimacy of their views. This allowed them to question climate science and climate policies based on it and to promote political inaction and inertia. …. footnote 1. I shall use 'climate sceptics' here in the sense of 'climate deniers', although there are obvious differences between scepticism and denial (see Shermer, 2010; Kemp, et al., 2010). However, 'climate sceptic' and 'climate scepticism' were commonly used during the 'climategate' debate as meaning 'climate denier'." Nerlich, Brigitte (2010). "'Climategate': Paradoxical Metaphors and Political Paralysis". Environmental Values. 19 (4): 419–442. doi:10.3197/096327110x531543. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 10 November 2021. สืบค้นเมื่อ 4 July 2015.

archive.org

Michaels, David (2008). Doubt is Their Product: How Industry's Assault on Science Threatens Your Health. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0199719764.

arstechnica.com

Timmer 2014 Timmer, John (16 December 2014). "Skeptics, deniers, and contrarians: The climate science label game". Ars Technica. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 2 October 2017. สืบค้นเมื่อ 14 June 2017.

books.google.com

Powell 2012, pp. 170–173 Powell, James Lawrence (2012). The Inquisition of Climate Science. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-15719-3. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 1 June 2021. สืบค้นเมื่อ 12 July 2015.
Hoggan, James; Littlemore, Richard (2009). Climate Cover-Up: The Crusade to Deny Global Warming. Vancouver: Greystone Books. ISBN 978-1-55365-485-8. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2010-03-19. See, e.g., p31 ff, describing industry-based advocacy strategies in the context of climate change denial, and p73 ff, describing involvement of free-market think tanks in climate-change denial.

doi.org

Dunlap 2013, pp. 691–698 Dunlap, Riley E. (2013). "Climate Change Skepticism and Denial: An Introduction". American Behavioral Scientist. 57 (6): 691–698. doi:10.1177/0002764213477097. S2CID 147126996. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 10 November 2021. สืบค้นเมื่อ 27 May 2015.
Dunlap 2013, pp. 691–698 Dunlap, Riley E. (2013). "Climate Change Skepticism and Denial: An Introduction". American Behavioral Scientist. 57 (6): 691–698. doi:10.1177/0002764213477097. S2CID 147126996. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 10 November 2021. สืบค้นเมื่อ 27 May 2015.
Nerlich 2010, pp. 419, 437: "Climate scepticism in the sense of climate denialism or contrarianism is not a new phenomenon, but it has recently been very much in the media spotlight. …. Such disagreements are not new but the emails provided climate sceptics, in the sense of deniers or contrarians, with a golden opportunity to mount a sustained effort aimed at demonstrating the legitimacy of their views. This allowed them to question climate science and climate policies based on it and to promote political inaction and inertia. …. footnote 1. I shall use 'climate sceptics' here in the sense of 'climate deniers', although there are obvious differences between scepticism and denial (see Shermer, 2010; Kemp, et al., 2010). However, 'climate sceptic' and 'climate scepticism' were commonly used during the 'climategate' debate as meaning 'climate denier'." Nerlich, Brigitte (2010). "'Climategate': Paradoxical Metaphors and Political Paralysis". Environmental Values. 19 (4): 419–442. doi:10.3197/096327110x531543. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 10 November 2021. สืบค้นเมื่อ 4 July 2015.
Dunlap 2013 Dunlap, Riley E. (2013). "Climate Change Skepticism and Denial: An Introduction". American Behavioral Scientist. 57 (6): 691–698. doi:10.1177/0002764213477097. S2CID 147126996. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 10 November 2021. สืบค้นเมื่อ 27 May 2015.
Jacques, Dunlap & Freeman 2008, p. 351: "Conservative think tanks...and their backers launched a full-scale counter-movement... We suggest that this counter-movement has been central to the reversal of US support for environmental protection, both domestically and internationally. Its major tactic has been disputing the seriousness of environmental problems and undermining environmental science by promoting what we term 'environmental scepticism.'" Jacques, P.J.; Dunlap, Riley E.; Freeman, M. (2008). "The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism". Environmental Politics. 17 (3): 349–385. doi:10.1080/09644010802055576. S2CID 144975102.
Painter & Ashe 2012 Painter, James; Ashe, Teresa (2012). "Cross-national comparison of the presence of climate scepticism in the print media in six countries, 2007". Environ. Res. Lett. 7 (4): 044005. Bibcode:2012ERL.....7d4005P. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044005.
Diethelm & McKee 2009 Diethelm, Pascal; McKee, Martin (January 2009). "Denialism: what is it and how should scientists respond?". European Journal of Public Health. 19 (1): 2–4. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckn139. PMID 19158101.
Dunlap 2013 Dunlap, Riley E. (2013). "Climate Change Skepticism and Denial: An Introduction". American Behavioral Scientist. 57 (6): 691–698. doi:10.1177/0002764213477097. S2CID 147126996. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 10 November 2021. สืบค้นเมื่อ 27 May 2015.

guardian.co.uk

Goldenberg, Suzanne (2013-02-14). "Secret funding helped build vast network of climate denial thinktanks". The Guardian. London. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-03-01.

harvard.edu

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

Painter & Ashe 2012 Painter, James; Ashe, Teresa (2012). "Cross-national comparison of the presence of climate scepticism in the print media in six countries, 2007". Environ. Res. Lett. 7 (4): 044005. Bibcode:2012ERL.....7d4005P. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044005.

ipcc.ch

"CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: Synthesis Report. Summary for Policymakers" (PDF). IPCC. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิม (PDF)เมื่อ 2015-02-27. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2015-03-07. The evidence for human influence on the climate system has grown since the Fourth Assessment Report (AR4). It is extremely likely that more than half of the observed increase in global average surface temperature from 1951 to 2010 was caused by the anthropogenic increase in greenhouse gas concentrations and other anthropogenic forcings together

ncse.com

National Center for Science Education 2010 National Center for Science Education (4 June 2010). "Climate change is good science". National Center for Science Education. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 24 April 2016. สืบค้นเมื่อ 21 June 2015.
National Center for Science Education 2012 National Center for Science Education (5 January 2012). "Why Is It Called Denial?". National Center for Science Education. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 26 May 2016. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2 June 2015.

newsweek.com

Begley 2007 Begley, Sharon (13 August 2007). "The Truth About Denial". Newsweek. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 21 October 2007. (MSNBC single page version, archived 20 August 2007)

nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Diethelm & McKee 2009 Diethelm, Pascal; McKee, Martin (January 2009). "Denialism: what is it and how should scientists respond?". European Journal of Public Health. 19 (1): 2–4. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckn139. PMID 19158101.

researchgate.net

Dunlap 2013, pp. 691–698 Dunlap, Riley E. (2013). "Climate Change Skepticism and Denial: An Introduction". American Behavioral Scientist. 57 (6): 691–698. doi:10.1177/0002764213477097. S2CID 147126996. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 10 November 2021. สืบค้นเมื่อ 27 May 2015.
Dunlap 2013, pp. 691–698 Dunlap, Riley E. (2013). "Climate Change Skepticism and Denial: An Introduction". American Behavioral Scientist. 57 (6): 691–698. doi:10.1177/0002764213477097. S2CID 147126996. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 10 November 2021. สืบค้นเมื่อ 27 May 2015.
Dunlap 2013 Dunlap, Riley E. (2013). "Climate Change Skepticism and Denial: An Introduction". American Behavioral Scientist. 57 (6): 691–698. doi:10.1177/0002764213477097. S2CID 147126996. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 10 November 2021. สืบค้นเมื่อ 27 May 2015.
Dunlap 2013 Dunlap, Riley E. (2013). "Climate Change Skepticism and Denial: An Introduction". American Behavioral Scientist. 57 (6): 691–698. doi:10.1177/0002764213477097. S2CID 147126996. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 10 November 2021. สืบค้นเมื่อ 27 May 2015.

scienceblogs.com

Hoofnagle, Mark (2007-04-30). "Hello Science blogs (Welcome to Denialism blog)".

seattlepi.com

Connelly, Joel (2007-07-10). "Deniers of global warming harm us". Seattle Post-Intelligencer. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2009-12-25.

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

Dunlap 2013, pp. 691–698 Dunlap, Riley E. (2013). "Climate Change Skepticism and Denial: An Introduction". American Behavioral Scientist. 57 (6): 691–698. doi:10.1177/0002764213477097. S2CID 147126996. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 10 November 2021. สืบค้นเมื่อ 27 May 2015.
Dunlap 2013, pp. 691–698 Dunlap, Riley E. (2013). "Climate Change Skepticism and Denial: An Introduction". American Behavioral Scientist. 57 (6): 691–698. doi:10.1177/0002764213477097. S2CID 147126996. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 10 November 2021. สืบค้นเมื่อ 27 May 2015.
Dunlap 2013 Dunlap, Riley E. (2013). "Climate Change Skepticism and Denial: An Introduction". American Behavioral Scientist. 57 (6): 691–698. doi:10.1177/0002764213477097. S2CID 147126996. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 10 November 2021. สืบค้นเมื่อ 27 May 2015.
Jacques, Dunlap & Freeman 2008, p. 351: "Conservative think tanks...and their backers launched a full-scale counter-movement... We suggest that this counter-movement has been central to the reversal of US support for environmental protection, both domestically and internationally. Its major tactic has been disputing the seriousness of environmental problems and undermining environmental science by promoting what we term 'environmental scepticism.'" Jacques, P.J.; Dunlap, Riley E.; Freeman, M. (2008). "The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism". Environmental Politics. 17 (3): 349–385. doi:10.1080/09644010802055576. S2CID 144975102.
Dunlap 2013 Dunlap, Riley E. (2013). "Climate Change Skepticism and Denial: An Introduction". American Behavioral Scientist. 57 (6): 691–698. doi:10.1177/0002764213477097. S2CID 147126996. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 10 November 2021. สืบค้นเมื่อ 27 May 2015.

theage.com.au

Christoff, Peter (2007-07-09). "Climate change is another grim tale to be treated with respect - Opinion". Melbourne: Theage.com.au. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2010-03-19.

theguardian.com

Pilkington, Ed (2013-11-14). "Facebook and Microsoft help fund rightwing lobby network, report finds". The Guardian. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-11-17.

thenation.com

Klein, Naomi (2011-11-09). "Capitalism vs. the Climate". The Nation. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2012-01-02.

web.archive.org

National Center for Science Education 2010 National Center for Science Education (4 June 2010). "Climate change is good science". National Center for Science Education. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 24 April 2016. สืบค้นเมื่อ 21 June 2015.
Powell 2012, pp. 170–173 Powell, James Lawrence (2012). The Inquisition of Climate Science. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-15719-3. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 1 June 2021. สืบค้นเมื่อ 12 July 2015.
Dunlap 2013, pp. 691–698 Dunlap, Riley E. (2013). "Climate Change Skepticism and Denial: An Introduction". American Behavioral Scientist. 57 (6): 691–698. doi:10.1177/0002764213477097. S2CID 147126996. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 10 November 2021. สืบค้นเมื่อ 27 May 2015.
Timmer 2014 Timmer, John (16 December 2014). "Skeptics, deniers, and contrarians: The climate science label game". Ars Technica. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 2 October 2017. สืบค้นเมื่อ 14 June 2017.
National Center for Science Education 2012 National Center for Science Education (5 January 2012). "Why Is It Called Denial?". National Center for Science Education. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 26 May 2016. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2 June 2015.
Dunlap 2013, pp. 691–698 Dunlap, Riley E. (2013). "Climate Change Skepticism and Denial: An Introduction". American Behavioral Scientist. 57 (6): 691–698. doi:10.1177/0002764213477097. S2CID 147126996. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 10 November 2021. สืบค้นเมื่อ 27 May 2015.
Begley 2007 Begley, Sharon (13 August 2007). "The Truth About Denial". Newsweek. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 21 October 2007. (MSNBC single page version, archived 20 August 2007)
Nerlich 2010, pp. 419, 437: "Climate scepticism in the sense of climate denialism or contrarianism is not a new phenomenon, but it has recently been very much in the media spotlight. …. Such disagreements are not new but the emails provided climate sceptics, in the sense of deniers or contrarians, with a golden opportunity to mount a sustained effort aimed at demonstrating the legitimacy of their views. This allowed them to question climate science and climate policies based on it and to promote political inaction and inertia. …. footnote 1. I shall use 'climate sceptics' here in the sense of 'climate deniers', although there are obvious differences between scepticism and denial (see Shermer, 2010; Kemp, et al., 2010). However, 'climate sceptic' and 'climate scepticism' were commonly used during the 'climategate' debate as meaning 'climate denier'." Nerlich, Brigitte (2010). "'Climategate': Paradoxical Metaphors and Political Paralysis". Environmental Values. 19 (4): 419–442. doi:10.3197/096327110x531543. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 10 November 2021. สืบค้นเมื่อ 4 July 2015.
"CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: Synthesis Report. Summary for Policymakers" (PDF). IPCC. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิม (PDF)เมื่อ 2015-02-27. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2015-03-07. The evidence for human influence on the climate system has grown since the Fourth Assessment Report (AR4). It is extremely likely that more than half of the observed increase in global average surface temperature from 1951 to 2010 was caused by the anthropogenic increase in greenhouse gas concentrations and other anthropogenic forcings together
Dunlap 2013 Dunlap, Riley E. (2013). "Climate Change Skepticism and Denial: An Introduction". American Behavioral Scientist. 57 (6): 691–698. doi:10.1177/0002764213477097. S2CID 147126996. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 10 November 2021. สืบค้นเมื่อ 27 May 2015.
Dunlap 2013 Dunlap, Riley E. (2013). "Climate Change Skepticism and Denial: An Introduction". American Behavioral Scientist. 57 (6): 691–698. doi:10.1177/0002764213477097. S2CID 147126996. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 10 November 2021. สืบค้นเมื่อ 27 May 2015.