การลงคะแนนแบบคาร์ดินัล (Thai Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "การลงคะแนนแบบคาร์ดินัล" in Thai language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Thai rank
low place
low place
5th place
17th place
1st place
1st place
low place
low place
2nd place
4th place
703rd place
1,124th place
1,031st place
3,035th place
120th place
318th place
3,337th place
3,041st place
6th place
20th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
9,684th place
low place
low place
low place
551st place
859th place

archive.org

archives-ouvertes.fr

halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr

  • Baujard, Antoinette; Gavrel, Frédéric; Igersheim, Herrade; Laslier, Jean-François; Lebon, Isabelle (September 2017). "How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting" (PDF). European Journal of Political Economy. 55: 14–28. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2017.09.006. ISSN 0176-2680. A key feature of evaluative voting is a form of independence: the voter can evaluate all the candidates in turn ... another feature of evaluative voting ... is that voters can express some degree of preference.

doi.org

  • Baujard, Antoinette; Gavrel, Frédéric; Igersheim, Herrade; Laslier, Jean-François; Lebon, Isabelle (September 2017). "How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting" (PDF). European Journal of Political Economy. 55: 14–28. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2017.09.006. ISSN 0176-2680. A key feature of evaluative voting is a form of independence: the voter can evaluate all the candidates in turn ... another feature of evaluative voting ... is that voters can express some degree of preference.
  • Felsenthal, Dan S. (January 1989). "On combining approval with disapproval voting". Behavioral Science (ภาษาอังกฤษ). 34 (1): 53–60. doi:10.1002/bs.3830340105. ISSN 0005-7940. under CAV he has three options—cast one vote in favor, abstain, or cast one vote against.

electology.org

  • "Score Voting". The Center for Election Science. 21 May 2015. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 2019-01-25. สืบค้นเมื่อ 10 December 2016. Simplified forms of score voting automatically give skipped candidates the lowest possible score for the ballot they were skipped. Other forms have those ballots not affect the candidate’s rating at all. Those forms not affecting the candidates rating frequently make use of quotas. Quotas demand a minimum proportion of voters rate that candidate in some way before that candidate is eligible to win.

electowiki.org

equal.vote

  • "STAR Voting". Equal Vote Coalition. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 2020-07-01. สืบค้นเมื่อ 14 July 2018.

ivn.us

medium.com

rangevoting.org

registerguard.com

researchgate.net

scorevoting.net

  • Smith, Warren D. (December 2000). "Range Voting" (PDF). The “range voting” system is as follows. In a c-candidate election, you select a vector of c real numbers, each of absolute value ≤1, as your vote. E.g. you could vote (+1, −1, +.3, −.9, +1) in a five-candidate election. The vote-vectors are summed to get a c-vector x and the winner is the i such that xi is maximum.

socialchoiceandbeyond.com

  • "Range Voting". Social Choice and Beyond. สืบค้นเมื่อ 10 December 2016. with the winner being the one with the largest point total. Or, alternatively, the average may be computed and the one with the highest average wins

ssrn.com

papers.ssrn.com

  • Vasiljev, Sergei (April 2008). "Cardinal Voting: The Way to Escape the Social Choice Impossibility by Sergei Vasiljev :: SSRN". SSRN 1116545. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal ต้องการ |journal= (help)
  • Hillinger, Claude (1 October 2004). "On the Possibility of Democracy and Rational Collective Choice" (ภาษาอังกฤษ). Rochester, NY. SSRN 608821. I favor 'evaluative voting' under which a voter can vote for or against any alternative, or abstain. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal ต้องการ |journal= (help)

uni-muenchen.de

epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de

  • Hillinger, Claude (1 May 2005). "The Case for Utilitarian Voting". Open Access LMU (ภาษาอังกฤษ). Munich. สืบค้นเมื่อ 15 May 2018. Specific UV rules that have been proposed are approval voting, allowing the scores 0, 1; range voting, allowing all numbers in an interval as scores; evaluative voting, allowing the scores −1, 0, 1.

voteupapp.com

web.archive.org

  • "Score Voting". The Center for Election Science. 21 May 2015. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 2019-01-25. สืบค้นเมื่อ 10 December 2016. Simplified forms of score voting automatically give skipped candidates the lowest possible score for the ballot they were skipped. Other forms have those ballots not affect the candidate’s rating at all. Those forms not affecting the candidates rating frequently make use of quotas. Quotas demand a minimum proportion of voters rate that candidate in some way before that candidate is eligible to win.
  • "Should you be using a more expressive voting system?". VoteUp app. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 2017-09-09. สืบค้นเมื่อ 15 May 2018. Score Voting—it's just like range voting except the scores are discrete instead of spanning a continuous range.
  • "STAR Voting". Equal Vote Coalition. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 2020-07-01. สืบค้นเมื่อ 14 July 2018.

worldcat.org

  • Baujard, Antoinette; Gavrel, Frédéric; Igersheim, Herrade; Laslier, Jean-François; Lebon, Isabelle (September 2017). "How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting" (PDF). European Journal of Political Economy. 55: 14–28. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2017.09.006. ISSN 0176-2680. A key feature of evaluative voting is a form of independence: the voter can evaluate all the candidates in turn ... another feature of evaluative voting ... is that voters can express some degree of preference.
  • Riker, William Harrison. (1982). Liberalism against populism : a confrontation between the theory of democracy and the theory of social choice. Waveland Pr. pp. 29–30. ISBN 0881333670. OCLC 316034736. Ordinal utility is a measure of preferences in terms of rank orders—that is, first, second, etc. ... Cardinal utility is a measure of preferences on a scale of cardinal numbers, such as the scale from zero to one or the scale from one to ten.
  • Felsenthal, Dan S. (January 1989). "On combining approval with disapproval voting". Behavioral Science (ภาษาอังกฤษ). 34 (1): 53–60. doi:10.1002/bs.3830340105. ISSN 0005-7940. under CAV he has three options—cast one vote in favor, abstain, or cast one vote against.