การออกแบบอย่างชาญฉลาด (Thai Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "การออกแบบอย่างชาญฉลาด" in Thai language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Thai rank

5wikisource.org

27^th place

92^nd place

4worldcat.org

5^th place

17^th place

4web.archive.org

1^st place

3discovery.org

low place

2doi.org

2^nd place

4^th place

1loc.gov

70^th place

139^th place

1canada.com

1,162^nd place

3,335^th place

1ugent.be

3,695^th place

8,780^th place

1handle.net

102^nd place

282^nd place

1nih.gov

4^th place

7^th place

1semanticscholar.org

11^th place

61^st place

1ideacenter.org

low place

1centerforinquiry.net

low place

1talkorigins.org

9,502^nd place

8,473^rd place

1findlaw.com

1,478^th place

1,037^th place

1touchstonemag.com

low place

1ctlibrary.com

low place

1thedailybeast.com

330^th place

1,995^th place

1udel.edu

4,858^th place

3,661^st place

1dtu.dk

low place

8,740^th place

canada.com

Meyer, Stephen C. (December 1, 2005). "Not by chance". National Post. Don Mills, Ontario: CanWest MediaWorks Publications Inc. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ May 1, 2006. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2014-02-28.

centerforinquiry.net

Forrest, Barbara (May 2007). "Understanding the Intelligent Design Creationist Movement: Its True Nature and Goals" (PDF). Center for Inquiry. Washington, D.C.: Center for Inquiry. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิม (PDF)เมื่อ May 19, 2011. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2007-08-06.

ctlibrary.com

Meyer, Stephen C.; Nelson, Paul A. (May 1, 1996). "Getting Rid of the Unfair Rules". Origins & Design (Book review). Colorado Springs, Colo.: Access Research Network. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2007-05-20.
- Johnson, Phillip E. (May–June 1996). "Third-Party Science". Books & Culture (Book review). Vol. 2 no. 3. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 2014-02-19. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2012-06-16.

discovery.org

"CSC – Frequently Asked Questions: Questions About Intelligent Design: What is the theory of intelligent design?". Center for Science and Culture. Seattle: Discovery Institute. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2018-07-15.
- "Intelligent Design Theory in a Nutshell" (PDF). Seattle: Intelligent Design and Evolution Awareness Center. 2004. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2012-06-16.
- "Media Backgrounder: Intelligent Design Article Sparks Controversy". Center for Science and Culture. Seattle: Discovery Institute. September 7, 2004. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2014-02-28.
  - Johnson, Phillip E. (June 2002). "Berkeley's Radical". Touchstone: A Journal of Mere Christianity (Interview). 15 (5). สัมภาษณ์โดย James M. Kushiner. Chicago: Fellowship of St. James. ISSN 0897-327X. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2012-06-16.
  - Meyer, Stephen C.; Nelson, Paul A. (May 1, 1996). "Getting Rid of the Unfair Rules". Origins & Design (Book review). Colorado Springs, Colo.: Access Research Network. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2007-05-20.
    - Johnson, Phillip E. (May–June 1996). "Third-Party Science". Books & Culture (Book review). Vol. 2 no. 3. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 2014-02-19. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2012-06-16.

doi.org

Boudry, Maarten; Blancke, Stefaan; Braeckman, Johan (December 2010). "Irreducible Incoherence and Intelligent Design: A Look into the Conceptual Toolbox of a Pseudoscience" (PDF). The Quarterly Review of Biology. 85 (4): 473–482. doi:10.1086/656904. hdl:1854/LU-952482. ISSN 0033-5770. PMID 21243965. S2CID 27218269. Article available from Universiteit Gent
"An intelligently designed response". Nature Methods (Editorial). 4 (12): 983. December 2007. doi:10.1038/nmeth1207-983. ISSN 1548-7091.

dtu.dk

cbs.dtu.dk

McDonald, John H. "A reducibly complex mousetrap". สืบค้นเมื่อ 2014-02-28.
- Ussery, David (December 1997). "A Biochemist's Response to 'The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution'" (Book review). คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ March 4, 2014. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2014-02-28.

findlaw.com

caselaw.findlaw.com

Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, 04 cv 2688 (December 20, 2005). s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District#E. Application of the Endorsement Test to the ID Policy p. 32 ff, citing Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 .

handle.net

hdl.handle.net

Boudry, Maarten; Blancke, Stefaan; Braeckman, Johan (December 2010). "Irreducible Incoherence and Intelligent Design: A Look into the Conceptual Toolbox of a Pseudoscience" (PDF). The Quarterly Review of Biology. 85 (4): 473–482. doi:10.1086/656904. hdl:1854/LU-952482. ISSN 0033-5770. PMID 21243965. S2CID 27218269. Article available from Universiteit Gent

ideacenter.org

"CSC – Frequently Asked Questions: Questions About Intelligent Design: What is the theory of intelligent design?". Center for Science and Culture. Seattle: Discovery Institute. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2018-07-15.
- "Intelligent Design Theory in a Nutshell" (PDF). Seattle: Intelligent Design and Evolution Awareness Center. 2004. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2012-06-16.

loc.gov

lccn.loc.gov

Numbers 2006, p. 373; "[ID] captured headlines for its bold attempt to rewrite the basic rules of science and its claim to have found indisputable evidence of a God-like being. Proponents, however, insisted it was 'not a religious-based idea, but instead an evidence-based scientific theory about life's origins – one that challenges strictly materialistic views of evolution.' Although the intellectual roots of the design argument go back centuries, its contemporary incarnation dates from the 1980s"Numbers, Ronald L. (2006) [Originally published 1992 as The Creationists: The Evolution of Scientific Creationism; New York: Alfred A. Knopf]. The Creationists: From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design (Expanded ed., 1st Harvard University Press pbk. ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-02339-0. LCCN 2006043675. OCLC 69734583.

nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Boudry, Maarten; Blancke, Stefaan; Braeckman, Johan (December 2010). "Irreducible Incoherence and Intelligent Design: A Look into the Conceptual Toolbox of a Pseudoscience" (PDF). The Quarterly Review of Biology. 85 (4): 473–482. doi:10.1086/656904. hdl:1854/LU-952482. ISSN 0033-5770. PMID 21243965. S2CID 27218269. Article available from Universiteit Gent

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

Boudry, Maarten; Blancke, Stefaan; Braeckman, Johan (December 2010). "Irreducible Incoherence and Intelligent Design: A Look into the Conceptual Toolbox of a Pseudoscience" (PDF). The Quarterly Review of Biology. 85 (4): 473–482. doi:10.1086/656904. hdl:1854/LU-952482. ISSN 0033-5770. PMID 21243965. S2CID 27218269. Article available from Universiteit Gent

talkorigins.org

"Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District Trial transcript: Day 6 (October 5), PM Session, Part 1". TalkOrigins Archive. Houston: The TalkOrigins Foundation, Inc. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2012-06-16. Q. Has the Discovery Institute been a leader in the intelligent design movement? A. Yes, the Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture. Q. And are almost all of the individuals who are involved with the intelligent design movement associated with the Discovery Institute? A. All of the leaders are, yes.

thedailybeast.com

Giberson, Karl W. (April 21, 2014). "My Debate With an 'Intelligent Design' Theorist". The Daily Beast. New York: The Newsweek Daily Beast Company. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2014-05-14.

touchstonemag.com

"Media Backgrounder: Intelligent Design Article Sparks Controversy". Center for Science and Culture. Seattle: Discovery Institute. September 7, 2004. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2014-02-28.
- Johnson, Phillip E. (June 2002). "Berkeley's Radical". Touchstone: A Journal of Mere Christianity (Interview). 15 (5). สัมภาษณ์โดย James M. Kushiner. Chicago: Fellowship of St. James. ISSN 0897-327X. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2012-06-16.

udel.edu

McDonald, John H. "A reducibly complex mousetrap". สืบค้นเมื่อ 2014-02-28.
- Ussery, David (December 1997). "A Biochemist's Response to 'The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution'" (Book review). คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ March 4, 2014. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2014-02-28.

ugent.be

biblio.ugent.be

Boudry, Maarten; Blancke, Stefaan; Braeckman, Johan (December 2010). "Irreducible Incoherence and Intelligent Design: A Look into the Conceptual Toolbox of a Pseudoscience" (PDF). The Quarterly Review of Biology. 85 (4): 473–482. doi:10.1086/656904. hdl:1854/LU-952482. ISSN 0033-5770. PMID 21243965. S2CID 27218269. Article available from Universiteit Gent

web.archive.org

Meyer, Stephen C. (December 1, 2005). "Not by chance". National Post. Don Mills, Ontario: CanWest MediaWorks Publications Inc. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ May 1, 2006. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2014-02-28.
Forrest, Barbara (May 2007). "Understanding the Intelligent Design Creationist Movement: Its True Nature and Goals" (PDF). Center for Inquiry. Washington, D.C.: Center for Inquiry. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิม (PDF)เมื่อ May 19, 2011. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2007-08-06.
Meyer, Stephen C.; Nelson, Paul A. (May 1, 1996). "Getting Rid of the Unfair Rules". Origins & Design (Book review). Colorado Springs, Colo.: Access Research Network. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2007-05-20.
- Johnson, Phillip E. (May–June 1996). "Third-Party Science". Books & Culture (Book review). Vol. 2 no. 3. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 2014-02-19. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2012-06-16.
- McDonald, John H. "A reducibly complex mousetrap". สืบค้นเมื่อ 2014-02-28.
  - Ussery, David (December 1997). "A Biochemist's Response to 'The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution'" (Book review). คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ March 4, 2014. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2014-02-28.

wikisource.org

th.wikisource.org

Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, 04 cv 2688 (December 20, 2005). s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District#E. Application of the Endorsement Test to the ID Policy, pp. 31–33.
Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, 04 cv 2688 (December 20, 2005). s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District#E. Application of the Endorsement Test to the ID Policy p. 32 ff, citing Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 .
Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, 04 cv 2688 (December 20, 2005). s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District#4. Whether ID is Science Page 69 and s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District#H. Conclusion p. 136.
Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, 04 cv 2688 (December 20, 2005). s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District#E. Application of the Endorsement Test to the ID Policy pp. 24–25. "the argument for ID is not a new scientific argument, but is rather an old religious argument for the existence of God. He traced this argument back to at least Thomas Aquinas in the 13th century, who framed the argument as a syllogism: Wherever complex design exists, there must have been a designer; nature is complex; therefore nature must have had an intelligent designer. ...
...[T]his argument for the existence of God was advanced early in the 19th century by Reverend Paley... [the teleological argument] The only apparent difference between the argument made by Paley and the argument for ID, as expressed by defense expert witnesses Behe and Minnich, is that ID's 'official position' does not acknowledge that the designer is God."
Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, 04 cv 2688 (December 20, 2005). s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District#4. Whether ID is Science, p. 64.

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

Numbers 2006, p. 373; "[ID] captured headlines for its bold attempt to rewrite the basic rules of science and its claim to have found indisputable evidence of a God-like being. Proponents, however, insisted it was 'not a religious-based idea, but instead an evidence-based scientific theory about life's origins – one that challenges strictly materialistic views of evolution.' Although the intellectual roots of the design argument go back centuries, its contemporary incarnation dates from the 1980s"Numbers, Ronald L. (2006) [Originally published 1992 as The Creationists: The Evolution of Scientific Creationism; New York: Alfred A. Knopf]. The Creationists: From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design (Expanded ed., 1st Harvard University Press pbk. ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-02339-0. LCCN 2006043675. OCLC 69734583.
Boudry, Maarten; Blancke, Stefaan; Braeckman, Johan (December 2010). "Irreducible Incoherence and Intelligent Design: A Look into the Conceptual Toolbox of a Pseudoscience" (PDF). The Quarterly Review of Biology. 85 (4): 473–482. doi:10.1086/656904. hdl:1854/LU-952482. ISSN 0033-5770. PMID 21243965. S2CID 27218269. Article available from Universiteit Gent
"An intelligently designed response". Nature Methods (Editorial). 4 (12): 983. December 2007. doi:10.1038/nmeth1207-983. ISSN 1548-7091.
"Media Backgrounder: Intelligent Design Article Sparks Controversy". Center for Science and Culture. Seattle: Discovery Institute. September 7, 2004. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2014-02-28.
- Johnson, Phillip E. (June 2002). "Berkeley's Radical". Touchstone: A Journal of Mere Christianity (Interview). 15 (5). สัมภาษณ์โดย James M. Kushiner. Chicago: Fellowship of St. James. ISSN 0897-327X. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2012-06-16.