ระบบการลงคะแนนแบบคะแนนรวม (Thai Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "ระบบการลงคะแนนแบบคะแนนรวม" in Thai language version.

Last modified:

Ref.Un. Ref.Website
Global rank Thai rank
2nd place
3rd place
low place
low place
1st place
1st place
5th place
6th place
1,143rd place
1,398th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,411th place
948th place
low place
low place
4th place
8th place
6th place
5th place
7th place
23rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
2,153rd place
2,490th place
low place
low place
3,271st place
3,823rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place

archive.org (Global: 6th place; Thai: 5th place)

archives-ouvertes.fr (Global: 1,143rd place; Thai: 1,398th place)

halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr

hal.archives-ouvertes.fr

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; Thai: 3rd place)

electology.org (Global: low place; Thai: low place)

  • "Score Voting". The Center for Election Science. 2015-05-21. ข้อมูลเก่าจากต้นฉบับ เมื่อ 2019-01-25. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2016-12-11.
  • "Score Voting". The Center for Election Science. 2015-05-21. ข้อมูลเก่าจากต้นฉบับ เมื่อ 2019-01-25. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2016-12-10. Simplified forms of score voting automatically give skipped candidates the lowest possible score for the ballot they were skipped. Other forms have those ballots not affect the candidate's rating at all. Those forms not affecting the candidates rating frequently make use of quotas. Quotas demand a minimum proportion of voters rate that candidate in some way before that candidate is eligible to win.

equal.vote (Global: low place; Thai: low place)

evanmiller.org (Global: low place; Thai: low place)

  • "How Not To Sort By Average Rating". evanmiller.org. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2016-12-11. Average rating works fine if you always have a ton of ratings, but suppose item 1 has 2 positive ratings and 0 negative ratings. ...

groups.google.com (Global: 2,153rd place; Thai: 2,490th place)

  • "Google Groups". groups.google.com. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2017-04-05.

independentpoliticalreport.com (Global: low place; Thai: low place)

  • "Utah Green Party Hosts Dr. Stein; Elects New Officers". Independent Political Report (ภาษาอังกฤษแบบอเมริกัน). 2017-06-27. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2017-09-14. Using the following Range Voting System, the Green Party of Utah elected a new slate of officers

ivn.us (Global: low place; Thai: low place)

nih.gov (Global: 5th place; Thai: 6th place)

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

nytimes.com (Global: 7th place; Thai: 23rd place)

query.nytimes.com

pnas.org (Global: 1,411th place; Thai: 948th place)

rangevoting.org (Global: low place; Thai: low place)

scorevoting.net (Global: low place; Thai: low place)

  • Smith, Warren D. (ธันวาคม 2000). "Range Voting" (PDF). The "range voting" system is as follows. In a c-candidate election, you select a vector of c real numbers, each of absolute value ≤1, as your vote. E.g. you could vote (+1, −1, +.3, −.9, +1) in a 5-candidate election. The vote-vectors are summed to get a c-vector x and the winner is the i such that xi is maximum.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: date auto-translated (ลิงก์)

socialchoiceandbeyond.com (Global: low place; Thai: low place)

  • "Social Choice and Beyond - Range Voting". socialchoiceandbeyond.com. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2016-12-10. with the winner being the one with the largest point total. Or, alternatively, the average may be computed and the one with the highest average wins

uni-muenchen.de (Global: 3,271st place; Thai: 3,823rd place)

epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de

  • Hillinger, Claude (2005-05-01). "The Case for Utilitarian Voting". Universitätsbibliothek der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (ภาษาอังกฤษ). doi:10.5282/ubm/epub.653. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2018-05-15. Specific UV rules that have been proposed are approval voting, allowing the scores 0, 1; range voting, allowing all numbers in an interval as scores; evaluative voting, allowing the scores -1, 0, 1.

voteupapp.com (Global: low place; Thai: low place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; Thai: 1st place)

  • "Score Voting". The Center for Election Science. 2015-05-21. ข้อมูลเก่าจากต้นฉบับ เมื่อ 2019-01-25. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2016-12-11.
  • "Score Voting". The Center for Election Science. 2015-05-21. ข้อมูลเก่าจากต้นฉบับ เมื่อ 2019-01-25. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2016-12-10. Simplified forms of score voting automatically give skipped candidates the lowest possible score for the ballot they were skipped. Other forms have those ballots not affect the candidate's rating at all. Those forms not affecting the candidates rating frequently make use of quotas. Quotas demand a minimum proportion of voters rate that candidate in some way before that candidate is eligible to win.
  • Baujard, Antoinette; Igersheim, Herrade; Lebon, Isabelle; Gavrel, Frédéric; Laslier, Jean-François (2014-06-01). "Who's favored by evaluative voting? An experiment conducted during the 2012 French presidential election" (PDF). Electoral Studies. 34: 131–145. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2013.11.003. ข้อมูลเก่าจากต้นฉบับ (PDF) เมื่อ 2021-04-10. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2021-08-23. voting rules in which the voter freely grades each candidate on a pre-defined numerical scale. .. also called utilitarian voting
  • "Strategic SRV? - Equal Vote Coalition". Equal Vote Coalition. ข้อมูลเก่าจากต้นฉบับ เมื่อ 2017-08-31. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2017-04-05.
  • "Should you be using a more expressive voting system?". VoteUp app. ข้อมูลเก่าจากต้นฉบับ เมื่อ 2017-09-09. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2018-05-15. Score Voting -- it's just like range voting except the scores are discrete instead of spanning a continuous range.

worldcat.org (Global: 4th place; Thai: 8th place)

search.worldcat.org

  • Joslyn, Richard A. (1976). "The impact of decision rules in multi-candidate campaigns: The case of the 1972 democratic presidential nomination". Public Choice (ภาษาอังกฤษ). 25 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1007/BF01726327. ISSN 0048-5829.