ระบบรัฐสภา (Thai Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "ระบบรัฐสภา" in Thai language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Thai rank
1st place
1st place
3rd place
5th place
670th place
676th place
2nd place
4th place
367th place
511th place
104th place
64th place
8th place
15th place
30th place
94th place
27th place
92nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
7,941st place
low place
5th place
17th place
low place
low place
4,536th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
8,324th place
low place
305th place
242nd place
1,933rd place
2,302nd place
274th place
478th place
low place
low place

ait.org.tw

  • "Constitutionalism: America & Beyond". Bureau of International Information Programs (IIP), U.S. Department of State. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 24 October 2014. สืบค้นเมื่อ 30 October 2014. The earliest, and perhaps greatest, victory for liberalism was achieved in England. The rising commercial class that had supported the Tudor monarchy in the 16th century led the revolutionary battle in the 17th, and succeeded in establishing the supremacy of Parliament and, eventually, of the House of Commons. What emerged as the distinctive feature of modern constitutionalism was not the insistence on the idea that the king is subject to law (although this concept is an essential attribute of all constitutionalism). This notion was already well established in the Middle Ages. What was distinctive was the establishment of effective means of political control whereby the rule of law might be enforced. Modern constitutionalism was born with the political requirement that representative government depended upon the consent of citizen subjects.... However, as can be seen through provisions in the 1689 Bill of Rights, the English Revolution was fought not just to protect the rights of property (in the narrow sense) but to establish those liberties which liberals believed essential to human dignity and moral worth. The "rights of man" enumerated in the English Bill of Rights gradually were proclaimed beyond the boundaries of England, notably in the American Declaration of Independence of 1776 and in the French Declaration of the Rights of Man in 1789.

barandbench.com

bbc.co.uk

blog.gov.uk

history.blog.gov.uk

books.google.com

cam.ac.uk

cambridge.org

dcu.ie

webpages.dcu.ie

doi.org

ft.dk

gov.bd

bdlaws.minlaw.gov.bd

legalservicesindia.com

nujslawreview.org

parliament.nz

  • "Our system of government". New Zealand Parliament. 20 January 2016. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 17 October 2022. สืบค้นเมื่อ 27 October 2022.

parliament.uk

parliament.uk

  • "UK Parliament glossary". UK Parliament. 27 October 2022. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 28 September 2022. สืบค้นเมื่อ 27 October 2022.

commonslibrary.parliament.uk

prsindia.org

revue-pouvoirs.fr

springer.com

link.springer.com

  • Shugart, Matthew Søberg (December 2005). "Semi-Presidential Systems: Dual Executive And Mixed Authority Patterns" (PDF). French Politics. 3 (3): 323–351. doi:10.1057/palgrave.fp.8200087. สืบค้นเมื่อ 21 August 2017. Even if the president has no discretion in the forming of cabinets or the right to dissolve parliament, his or her constitutional authority can be regarded as 'quite considerable' in Duverger's sense if cabinet legislation approved in parliament can be blocked by the people's elected agent. Such powers are especially relevant if an extraordinary majority is required to override a veto, as in Mongolia, Poland, and Senegal. In these cases, while the government is fully accountable to parliament, it cannot legislate without taking the potentially different policy preferences of the president into account.

telegraph.co.uk

ucsd.edu

dss.ucsd.edu

unesco.org

  • "The Decreta of León of 1188 – The oldest documentary manifestation of the European parliamentary system". UNESCO Memory of the World. 2013. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 24 June 2016. สืบค้นเมื่อ 21 May 2016.

web.archive.org

  • "The Decreta of León of 1188 – The oldest documentary manifestation of the European parliamentary system". UNESCO Memory of the World. 2013. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 24 June 2016. สืบค้นเมื่อ 21 May 2016.
  • Jobson, Adrian (2012). The First English Revolution: Simon de Montfort, Henry III and the Barons' War. Bloomsbury. pp. 173–4. ISBN 978-1-84725-226-5. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 1 August 2020. สืบค้นเมื่อ 6 June 2020.
  • "Simon de Montfort: The turning point for democracy that gets overlooked". BBC. 19 January 2015. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 19 January 2015. สืบค้นเมื่อ 19 January 2015
  • "The January Parliament and how it defined Britain". The Telegraph. 20 January 2015. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 23 January 2015. สืบค้นเมื่อ 28 January 2015.
  • Kopstein, Jeffrey; Lichbach, Mark; Hanson, Stephen E., บ.ก. (2014). Comparative Politics: Interests, Identities, and Institutions in a Changing Global Order (4, revised ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 37–9. ISBN 978-1139991384. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 30 June 2020. สืบค้นเมื่อ 6 June 2020. Britain pioneered the system of liberal democracy that has now spread in one form or another to most of the world's countries
  • "Constitutionalism: America & Beyond". Bureau of International Information Programs (IIP), U.S. Department of State. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 24 October 2014. สืบค้นเมื่อ 30 October 2014. The earliest, and perhaps greatest, victory for liberalism was achieved in England. The rising commercial class that had supported the Tudor monarchy in the 16th century led the revolutionary battle in the 17th, and succeeded in establishing the supremacy of Parliament and, eventually, of the House of Commons. What emerged as the distinctive feature of modern constitutionalism was not the insistence on the idea that the king is subject to law (although this concept is an essential attribute of all constitutionalism). This notion was already well established in the Middle Ages. What was distinctive was the establishment of effective means of political control whereby the rule of law might be enforced. Modern constitutionalism was born with the political requirement that representative government depended upon the consent of citizen subjects.... However, as can be seen through provisions in the 1689 Bill of Rights, the English Revolution was fought not just to protect the rights of property (in the narrow sense) but to establish those liberties which liberals believed essential to human dignity and moral worth. The "rights of man" enumerated in the English Bill of Rights gradually were proclaimed beyond the boundaries of England, notably in the American Declaration of Independence of 1776 and in the French Declaration of the Rights of Man in 1789.
  • Blick, Andrew; Jones, George (1 January 2012). "The Institution of Prime Minister". History of Government Blog. Government of the United Kingdom. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 10 March 2016.
  • Carter, Byrum E. (2015) [1955]. "The Historical Development of the Office of Prime Minister". Office of the Prime Minister. Princeton University Press. ISBN 9781400878260. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 19 August 2020. สืบค้นเมื่อ 6 June 2020.
  • Julian Go (2007). "A Globalizing Constitutionalism?, Views from the Postcolony, 1945–2000". ใน Arjomand, Saïd Amir (บ.ก.). Constitutionalism and political reconstruction. Brill. pp. 92–94. ISBN 978-9004151741. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 1 August 2020. สืบค้นเมื่อ 6 June 2020.
  • "How the Westminster Parliamentary System was exported around the World". University of Cambridge. 2 December 2013. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 16 December 2013. สืบค้นเมื่อ 16 December 2013.
  • Seidle, F. Leslie; Docherty, David C. (2003). Reforming parliamentary democracy. McGill-Queen's University Press. p. 3. ISBN 9780773525085. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 19 August 2020. สืบค้นเมื่อ 6 June 2020.
  • Duverger, Maurice (September 1996). "Les monarchies républicaines" [The crowned republics] (PDF). Pouvoirs, revue française d'études constitutionnelles et politiques (ภาษาฝรั่งเศส). No. 78. Paris: Éditions du Seuil. pp. 107–120. ISBN 2-02-030123-7. ISSN 0152-0768. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิม (PDF)เมื่อ 1 October 2018. สืบค้นเมื่อ 10 September 2016.
  • Frosini, Justin Orlando (2008). Ferrari, Giuseppe Franco (บ.ก.). Forms of State and Forms of Government. Giuffrè Editore. pp. 54–55. ISBN 9788814143885. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 19 August 2020. สืบค้นเมื่อ 13 November 2016 – โดยทาง Google Books.
  • "The Anti-Defection Law – Intent and Impact Background Note for the Conference on Effective Legislatures" (PDF). เก็บ (PDF)จากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 19 August 2019. สืบค้นเมื่อ 16 December 2019.
  • "Anti-defection law the challenges". legalservicesindia.com. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 2 December 2019. สืบค้นเมื่อ 16 December 2019.
  • "ANTI-DEFECTION LAW: A DEATH KNELL FOR PARLIAMENTARY DISSENT?" (PDF). NUJS Law Review. Mar 2012. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิม (PDF)เมื่อ 28 May 2016. สืบค้นเมื่อ 15 May 2016.
  • "UK Parliament glossary". UK Parliament. 27 October 2022. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 28 September 2022. สืบค้นเมื่อ 27 October 2022.
  • "Our system of government". New Zealand Parliament. 20 January 2016. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 17 October 2022. สืบค้นเมื่อ 27 October 2022.
  • "Fixed-term Parliament Act 2011". UK Parliament. 26 November 2021. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 21 October 2022. สืบค้นเมื่อ 27 October 2022.
  • Shugart, Matthew Søberg (September 2005). "Semi-Presidential Systems: Dual Executive and Mixed Authority Patterns" (PDF). Graduate School of International Relations and Pacific Studies. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิม (PDF)เมื่อ 19 August 2008. สืบค้นเมื่อ 21 August 2017.
  • McMenamin, Iain. "Semi-Presidentialism and Democratisation in Poland" (PDF). School of Law and Government, Dublin City University. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิม (PDF)เมื่อ 12 February 2012. สืบค้นเมื่อ 11 December 2017.

wikisource.org

th.wikisource.org

worldcat.org