ลัทธิมากซ์–เลนิน (Thai Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "ลัทธิมากซ์–เลนิน" in Thai language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Thai rank
6th place
20th place
5th place
17th place
1st place
1st place
2nd place
4th place
1,266th place
1,768th place
low place
low place
4,134th place
low place
low place
low place
803rd place
694th place
9,546th place
3,276th place
26th place
72nd place
12th place
51st place

archive.org (Global: 6th place; Thai: 20th place)

  • Lansford, Tom (2008). Communism. Political systems of the world. New York: Marshall Cavendish Benchmark. ISBN 978-0-7614-2628-8. "By 1985, one-third of the world's population lived under a Marxist–Leninist system of government in one form or another."
  • Williams, Raymond (1983). "Socialism". Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society, revised edition. Oxford University Press. p. 289. ISBN 978-0-19-520469-8. The decisive distinction between socialist and communist, as in one sense these terms are now ordinarily used, came with the renaming, in 1918, of the Russian Social-Democratic Labour Party (Bolsheviks) as the All-Russian Communist Party (Bolsheviks). From that time on, a distinction of socialist from communist, often with supporting definitions such as social democrat or democratic socialist, became widely current, although it is significant that all communist parties, in line with earlier usage, continued to describe themselves as socialist and dedicated to socialism.
  • Parenti, Michael (1997). Blackshirts and Reds: Rational Fascism and the Overthrow of Communism. San Francisco: City Lights Books. ISBN 9780872863293.

brockport.edu (Global: low place; Thai: low place)

digitalcommons.brockport.edu

  • Sawicky, Nicholas D. (20 December 2013). The Holodomor: Genocide and National Identity (Education and Human Development Master's Theses). The College at Brockport: State University of New York. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 2021-02-06. สืบค้นเมื่อ 6 October 2020 – โดยทาง Digital Commons. Scholars also disagree over what role the Soviet Union played in the tragedy. Some scholars point to Stalin as the mastermind behind the famine, due to his hatred of Ukrainians (Hosking, 1987). Others assert that Stalin did not actively cause the famine, but he knew about it and did nothing to stop it (Moore, 2012). Still other scholars argue that the famine was just an effect of the Soviet Union's push for rapid industrialization and a by-product of that was the destruction of the peasant way of life (Fischer, 1935). The final school of thought argues that the Holodomor was caused by factors beyond the control of the Soviet Union and Stalin took measures to reduce the effects of the famine on the Ukrainian people (Davies & Wheatcroft, 2006).

case.edu (Global: 4,134th place; Thai: low place)

scholarlycommons.law.case.edu

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; Thai: 4th place)

jasperbecker.com (Global: low place; Thai: low place)

  • Becker, Jasper (24 September 2010). "Systematic genocide" (PDF). The Spectator. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิม (PDF)เมื่อ 2021-08-02. สืบค้นเมื่อ 6 October 2020.

jstor.org (Global: 26th place; Thai: 72nd place)

  • Meyer, Gerald (Summer 2003). "Anarchism, Marxism and the Collapse of the Soviet Union". Science & Society. 67 (2): 218–221. ISSN 0036-8237. JSTOR 40404072.

marxists.org (Global: 803rd place; Thai: 694th place)

  • Cliff, Tony (1996). State Capitalism in Russia (PDF). สืบค้นเมื่อ 6 October 2020 – โดยทาง Marxists Internet Archive.

theanarchistlibrary.org (Global: 9,546th place; Thai: 3,276th place)

  • Voline (1995). แปลโดย Sharkey, Paul. "Red Fascism". Itinéraire. Paris (13). สืบค้นเมื่อ 6 October 2020 – โดยทาง The Anarchist Library. First published in the July 1934 edition of Ce qu'il faut dire (Brussels).{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: postscript (ลิงก์)

theguardian.com (Global: 12th place; Thai: 51st place)

  • Milne, Seumas (16 February 2006). "Communism may be dead, but clearly not dead enough". The Guardian. Retrieved 18 April 2020. "The dominant account gives no sense of how communist regimes renewed themselves after 1956 or why western leaders feared they might overtake the capitalist world well into the 1960s. For all its brutalities and failures, communism in the Soviet Union, eastern Europe and elsewhere delivered rapid industrialisation, mass education, job security and huge advances in social and gender equality."

umn.edu (Global: 1,266th place; Thai: 1,768th place)

cla.umn.edu

  • "Holodomor". Holocaust and Genocide Studies. College of Liberal Arts, University of Minnesota. สืบค้นเมื่อ 6 October 2020.

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; Thai: 1st place)

  • Becker, Jasper (24 September 2010). "Systematic genocide" (PDF). The Spectator. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิม (PDF)เมื่อ 2021-08-02. สืบค้นเมื่อ 6 October 2020.
  • Sawicky, Nicholas D. (20 December 2013). The Holodomor: Genocide and National Identity (Education and Human Development Master's Theses). The College at Brockport: State University of New York. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 2021-02-06. สืบค้นเมื่อ 6 October 2020 – โดยทาง Digital Commons. Scholars also disagree over what role the Soviet Union played in the tragedy. Some scholars point to Stalin as the mastermind behind the famine, due to his hatred of Ukrainians (Hosking, 1987). Others assert that Stalin did not actively cause the famine, but he knew about it and did nothing to stop it (Moore, 2012). Still other scholars argue that the famine was just an effect of the Soviet Union's push for rapid industrialization and a by-product of that was the destruction of the peasant way of life (Fischer, 1935). The final school of thought argues that the Holodomor was caused by factors beyond the control of the Soviet Union and Stalin took measures to reduce the effects of the famine on the Ukrainian people (Davies & Wheatcroft, 2006).

worldcat.org (Global: 5th place; Thai: 17th place)

search.worldcat.org