Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "วัคซีนโควิด-19 สปุตนิกวี" in Thai language version.
This is a reckless and foolish decision. Mass vaccination with an improperly tested vaccine is unethical. Any problem with the Russian vaccination campaign would be disastrous both through its negative effects on health, but also because it would further set back the acceptance of vaccines in the population.
{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (ลิงก์){{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (ลิงก์){{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (ลิงก์)This is a reckless and foolish decision. Mass vaccination with an improperly tested vaccine is unethical. Any problem with the Russian vaccination campaign would be disastrous both through its negative effects on health, but also because it would further set back the acceptance of vaccines in the population.
This is a reckless and foolish decision. Mass vaccination with an improperly tested vaccine is unethical. Any problem with the Russian vaccination campaign would be disastrous both through its negative effects on health, but also because it would further set back the acceptance of vaccines in the population.
On the 8th of April Dennik N published an article by Veronika Folentová entitled "Čo píše v stanovisku štátny ústav o Sputniku? Vakcíny v rôznych krajinách spája len názov" dennikn.sk/2343450/co-pise-v-stanovisku-statny-ustav-o-sputniku-vakciny-v-roznych-krajinach-spaja-len-nazov/
The article referred to the number of incorrect and misleading statements made by the Slovak regulator – State Institute for Drug Control (SUKL), which used for incorrect testing not EU-certified laboratory. RDIF and the Gamaleya Institute repeatedly insisted that all these statements were false and incorrect and rejected the Slovak allegations as "fake news".
<…>
We are concerned that your article in its current form contains unsubstantiated and false statements made by SUKL earlier and now refuted by the certified lab.
<…>
Therefore, we ask you to either remove the article entirely or reflect our position by publishing the above mentioned comments in full by the end of the day on May 9, 2021, as it is absolutely critical for us and shows the reality of the situation as well as reflects the enormous efforts by RDIF and partners in fighting the pandemic. Otherwise, RDIF reserves all rights to protect its reputation and legitimate interests and be compensated for any caused harm, including by commencing court proceedings against Dennik N in any relevant jurisdiction.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (ลิงก์){{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (ลิงก์)On the 8th of April Dennik N published an article by Veronika Folentová entitled "Čo píše v stanovisku štátny ústav o Sputniku? Vakcíny v rôznych krajinách spája len názov" dennikn.sk/2343450/co-pise-v-stanovisku-statny-ustav-o-sputniku-vakciny-v-roznych-krajinach-spaja-len-nazov/
The article referred to the number of incorrect and misleading statements made by the Slovak regulator – State Institute for Drug Control (SUKL), which used for incorrect testing not EU-certified laboratory. RDIF and the Gamaleya Institute repeatedly insisted that all these statements were false and incorrect and rejected the Slovak allegations as "fake news".
<…>
We are concerned that your article in its current form contains unsubstantiated and false statements made by SUKL earlier and now refuted by the certified lab.
<…>
Therefore, we ask you to either remove the article entirely or reflect our position by publishing the above mentioned comments in full by the end of the day on May 9, 2021, as it is absolutely critical for us and shows the reality of the situation as well as reflects the enormous efforts by RDIF and partners in fighting the pandemic. Otherwise, RDIF reserves all rights to protect its reputation and legitimate interests and be compensated for any caused harm, including by commencing court proceedings against Dennik N in any relevant jurisdiction.