สัญญาอนุญาตของสถาบันเทคโนโลยีแมสซาชูเซตส์ (Thai Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "สัญญาอนุญาตของสถาบันเทคโนโลยีแมสซาชูเซตส์" in Thai language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Thai rank
1st place
1st place
1,475th place
2,752nd place
low place
low place
3,857th place
9,381st place
low place
low place
68th place
166th place
low place
low place

debian.org

  • "License information". The Debian Project. Software in the Public Interest (ตีพิมพ์ 2017-07-12). 1997–2017. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 2017-07-20. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2017-07-20. This page presents the opinion of some debian-legal contributors on how certain licenses follow the Debian Free Software Guidelines (DFSG). ... Licenses currently found in Debian main include: ... Expat/MIT-style licenses ...

europa.eu

joinup.ec.europa.eu

  • "Licence Compatibility and Interoperability". Open-Source Software - Develop, share, and reuse open source software for public administrations. joinup.ec.europa.eu. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 2015-06-17. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2015-05-30. The licences for distributing free or open source software (FOSS) are divided in two families: permissive and copyleft. Permissive licences (BSD, MIT, X11, Apache, Zope) are generally compatible and interoperable with most other licences, tolerating to merge, combine or improve the covered code and to re-distribute it under many licences (including non-free or 'proprietary').

gnu.org

opensource.com

  • "The mysterious history of the MIT License". opensource.com. opensource.com. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2019-07-30. The date? The best single answer is probably 1987. But the complete story is more complicated and even a little mysterious. [...] Precursors from 1985. The X Consortium or X11 License variant from 1987. Or the Expat License from 1998 or 1999.
  • Hanwell, Marcus D. (2014-01-28). "Should I use a permissive license? Copyleft? Or something in the middle?". opensource.com. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2015-05-30. Permissive licensing simplifies things One reason the business world, and more and more developers [...], favor permissive licenses is in the simplicity of reuse. The license usually only pertains to the source code that is licensed and makes no attempt to infer any conditions upon any other component, and because of this there is no need to define what constitutes a derived work. I have also never seen a license compatibility chart for permissive licenses; it seems that they are all compatible.

opensource.org

tldrlegal.com

web.archive.org

  • "License information". The Debian Project. Software in the Public Interest (ตีพิมพ์ 2017-07-12). 1997–2017. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 2017-07-20. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2017-07-20. This page presents the opinion of some debian-legal contributors on how certain licenses follow the Debian Free Software Guidelines (DFSG). ... Licenses currently found in Debian main include: ... Expat/MIT-style licenses ...
  • "Various Licenses and Comments about Them". The GNU Project. Free Software Foundation (ตีพิมพ์ 2017-04-04). 2014–2017. Expat License. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 2017-07-20. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2017-07-20. This is a lax, permissive non-copyleft free software license, compatible with the GNU GPL. It is sometimes ambiguously referred to as the MIT License.
  • "Various Licenses and Comments about Them". The GNU Project. Free Software Foundation (ตีพิมพ์ 2017-04-04). 2014–2017. X11 License. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 2017-07-20. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2017-07-20. This is a lax permissive non-copyleft free software license, compatible with the GNU GPL. ... This license is sometimes called the MIT license, but that term is misleading, since MIT has used many licenses for software.
  • "Licenses by Name". Open Source Initiative. n.d. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 2017-07-20. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2017-07-20. The following licenses have been approved by the OSI. ... MIT License (MIT) ...
  • "Licence Compatibility and Interoperability". Open-Source Software - Develop, share, and reuse open source software for public administrations. joinup.ec.europa.eu. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 2015-06-17. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2015-05-30. The licences for distributing free or open source software (FOSS) are divided in two families: permissive and copyleft. Permissive licences (BSD, MIT, X11, Apache, Zope) are generally compatible and interoperable with most other licences, tolerating to merge, combine or improve the covered code and to re-distribute it under many licences (including non-free or 'proprietary').